J da Silva
Member
Registered: 10th Apr 03
Location: The FACTory
User status: Offline
|
whats the advantages apart from obviously gaining 200cc approx
|
Daimo B
Member
Registered: 20th Mar 00
User status: Offline
|
100cc?
1689cc i think it makes it.
|
J da Silva
Member
Registered: 10th Apr 03
Location: The FACTory
User status: Offline
|
theres a re-bore place near me and he says you can get an extra 200cc max anyway back to the original question
|
Daimo B
Member
Registered: 20th Mar 00
User status: Offline
|
I remember a topic years ago about this. A bloke was admiment his GSi was a 1.8 and he'd used the original block. HE got slated big time. When he had his feature later that year it was a 1.6 16v with exhaust, nothing else
I dont think the blcok walls are thick enough to bore out 200cc. Even the 2.0 can only be bored out to 88mm (2.1).
Will give you a little extra power, little more torque.
|
J da Silva
Member
Registered: 10th Apr 03
Location: The FACTory
User status: Offline
|
ive been misinformed then, this was my arguement, im havin trouble tellin a mate of mine that he'd be best off going the 2litre route, but hes 2 years younger than me and doesnt have 3.5k to spend at the min
|
Tom
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: Wirral, Merseyside
User status: Offline
|
£3.5 for a 2.0 conversion
|
Daimo B
Member
Registered: 20th Mar 00
User status: Offline
|
£1500 for 2.0 + £2k insurance probably
|
J da Silva
Member
Registered: 10th Apr 03
Location: The FACTory
User status: Offline
|
im including the parts,engine,labour cost, suspension kits,gearbox,rear disc convert fitting kit etc. just a rough estimate
|
J da Silva
Member
Registered: 10th Apr 03
Location: The FACTory
User status: Offline
|
exactly daimo
|
Tom
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: Wirral, Merseyside
User status: Offline
|
|
J da Silva
Member
Registered: 10th Apr 03
Location: The FACTory
User status: Offline
|
for insurance reasons he wants to bore his lump out a little, and get a better compression ratio by skimming its skull down a bit
|