sxi boy
Member
Registered: 11th Apr 02
Location: north east Drives: clio 182
User status: Offline
|
who tested it at 16.5?? evo tested it at 17.7 as opposed to 17.5 of the 182
|
vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by sxi boy
who tested it at 16.5?? evo tested it at 17.7 as opposed to 17.5 of the 182
autocar. evo tests are crap
|
dinosaur
Member
Registered: 21st Apr 04
Location: Bolton, not London
User status: Offline
|
http://forum.cliosport.net
go on there are quote some figures
they'll tell you how they beat an Aston Martin DB9 in their cup on a private road.
|
dinosaur
Member
Registered: 21st Apr 04
Location: Bolton, not London
User status: Offline
|
http://forum.cliosport.net/display_topic_threads.asp?ForumID=12&TopicID=85648&PagePosition=1
lots of strange posts there, but entertaining if you are bored
|
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
|
hmm interesting. Lots of conflicting figures here. Well i can take from this that 6.1 MUST be wrong, and must be closer to 6.5secs. I will go and find the mag tomorrow and see what they had to say about the 182. I like the 182's looks, as long as it hasnt got those viper stripes. Exhausts look much better in the flesh than mag pics IMO.
|