loz@sussexcarz.com
Member
Registered: 7th Oct 04
Location: East Sussex
User status: Offline
|
r they the v6 conversion brakes?did he do ur conversion?what bhp is urs running?
cheers
|
bradfincham
Member
Registered: 20th Sep 02
Location: East Of England Drives: Clio 172
User status: Offline
|
nope i bought my car like it,
mines running roughly 165 bhp now, but the torque is 168 lb ft as i have more bottom end work!!
no he does 2ltr brakes which are fine, v6 can be spongey!
I am soon to invest in £600 4 pot setup
|
timrud_
Member
Registered: 3rd Jul 04
Location: Sheffield
User status: Offline
|
4 pots rock 
|
myke
Member
Registered: 7th Feb 01
Location: High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by bradfincham
no he does 2ltr brakes which are fine, v6 can be spongey!
what gives you that idea, Brad?
|
jr
Member
Registered: 20th May 02
Location: Kent
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by myke
quote:
Originally posted by bradfincham
no he does 2ltr brakes which are fine, v6 can be spongey!
what gives you that idea, Brad?
te pedal feel on v6 are alwasy spongy it seams
mine were fine on the 1.4, but thats when the brake servo vacume was connected to the manztle, when that was removed they went a bit shite
|
myke
Member
Registered: 7th Feb 01
Location: High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire
User status: Offline
|
can't see how the v6's are worse than the ATE's.
you think it's due to insufficient vacuum or the servo itself?
|
