Matt L
Member
Registered: 17th Apr 06
User status: Offline
|
just trying to get a decentish watermark that doesnt distract too much but is also quite hard to edit out (although all watermarks are relitively easy if you have the time/knowhow)
now tbh doubt anyone would steal my pics but its more for when they go on my site/people who will potentially buy them are shown them online so they cant steal them there and then if that makes sense.
but heres two different designs on 3 different pics.
1.
2.
3.
4.
or anyone else got any other ideas?
|
nathy_87
Member
Registered: 14th Aug 08
Location: West Mids. Drives: Škoda Fabia VRS 5J
User status: Offline
|
I knbow it's boring but why not just
'Matt Lindop Photography'
Exactly how it is just without the spalsh effect. 
|
Adam_B
Member
Registered: 13th Dec 00
Location: Lancashire
User status: Offline
|
My personal opinion is none. Ignorance is bliss, and just deal with it if you find someone has used one.
|
will_ainsworth
Member
Registered: 8th Jun 07
Location: London, UK
User status: Offline
|
if i was a customer, and saw number four, i would be upset that you had spaffed your load all over the bride and her dress, then wrote your name with it 
|
Matt L
Member
Registered: 17th Apr 06
User status: Offline
|
Nath - Unless i can find a slightly more interesting i think that would be too boring.
adam - may end up doing tbh but id rather have something to save the hassle if it happens.
will -
|
nathy_87
Member
Registered: 14th Aug 08
Location: West Mids. Drives: Škoda Fabia VRS 5J
User status: Offline
|
Ok then matt, Does it have to be a 'splash effect' and right over the main photo?
|
Matt L
Member
Registered: 17th Apr 06
User status: Offline
|
doesnt have to but just liked it and it adds to the difficulty of getting rid of it.
would something a little different to the norm which is why i thought of using the splash effect, going to try another one tonight and see what people think.
|
nathy_87
Member
Registered: 14th Aug 08
Location: West Mids. Drives: Škoda Fabia VRS 5J
User status: Offline
|
Yeah i see what you mean, ok maybe just not smack bang in the middle of the photo (im commenting more on the bride photo.)
|
ali_g
Member
Registered: 2nd Mar 10
User status: Offline
|
Personally number 2 for me, about 20% smaller in bottom right of photos.
|
Rich H
Member
Registered: 26th Oct 05
Location: West Sussex Drives: E46 M3
User status: Offline
|
Yeh #2 for me, or use your avatar - it still makes me
|
Root
Member
Registered: 28th Dec 08
User status: Offline
|
bottom one looks like she has been spunked all over.
Bare in mind simply putting it in the corner, it can be cropped off the image but putting it in the center, like the spunk on her face, is ruining the image
|
Whittie
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 06
Location: North Wales Drives: BMW, Corsa & Fiat
User status: Offline
|
They're all gash, lose the gay design, if you really need to watermark the pictures, then use a bold font only.
|
John
Member
Registered: 30th Jun 03
User status: Offline
|
I'd just use lower res photos on the site, they all look terrible.
|
Daveskater
Premium Member
Registered: 29th Apr 08
Location: Oxford, UK Drives: Jap wagon
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by will_ainsworth
if i was a customer, and saw number four, i would be upset that you had spaffed your load all over the bride and her dress, then wrote your name with it
Numberwang!
Originally posted by AlunJ
I like you Dave, you are a man of men
Originally Whatapp'd by Neo
Dave's maybe capable of a drive-by cuddle
Look at my pictures
|
