LeeM
Member
Registered: 26th Sep 05
Location: Liverpool
User status: Offline
|
MI6 ip traces goin out
|
Toby
Premium Member
Registered: 29th Nov 05
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Hammer
quote:
Originally posted by Toby
quote:
Originally posted by Hammer
I'm not sure I'm following you?
Are you saying this is some kind of hoax to higlight how slack airport security is?
Yeah in a nut shell.
So many things to be answered for and the way the media have instant yfocused on the security side of.things as opposed to the other side of the coin and the story about the boy, why he did it etc?
I don't understand your logic at all or how an 11 year old boarding a flight in Manchester has anything to do with the Olympics 
Why? So many questions that are lacking answers which leave the story very far fetched, i have just identified a few.
Im not saying anything is to do or not to do with the Olympics, my point was more about security which you would expect to be tightened around this time, again questioning the authenticity of the story.
|
djgritt
Premium Member
Registered: 1st Nov 07
Location: Dorset Drives: Focus ST / Hyundai i20N
User status: Offline
|
I fly worldwide on a near weekly basis, and Airport Security is the bane of my fucking life.
How a child can get through all of the control measures and not be found out until mid-flight is beyond me.
Also
quote:
The spokesman said: "It is clear that documentation has not been checked correctly at security and the boarding gate.
"The boy went through full security screening, so the safety of passengers and the aircraft was never compromised."
Contradiction much? I'm sorry, but documentation checks are part of the whole security screening process, so to say the full process was performed is utter tosh.
|
Jambo
Member
Registered: 8th Sep 01
Location: Maidenhead, Drives: VXR Arctic
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Whittie
Good luck to any paki getting through with a bomb under his turban.
An 11 year old kid isn't a thread, people need to stop looking into everything as terrorism.
Nothing worse than rascism.......
Unless its factually incorrect rascism 
|
LeeM
Member
Registered: 26th Sep 05
Location: Liverpool
User status: Offline
|
Not defending racism but what's incorrect about a Pakistani wearing a turban?
|
Jambo
Member
Registered: 8th Sep 01
Location: Maidenhead, Drives: VXR Arctic
User status: Offline
|
Because turbans are part of the Sikh faith and Nothing to do with Islam/Muslim of which Pakistan exists solely because of the divide in religion in India.
The terrorist jibe was aimed at jihadist muslims who take a fancy to avro terrorism. Whilst Sikhs have been linked with one such instance in the past (although never proven) they don't tend to blow shit up like their arch enemies do.
I was merely pointing out he had his generalisations a wrong
|
LeeM
Member
Registered: 26th Sep 05
Location: Liverpool
User status: Offline
|
Thought some Muslims wore a turban as well, just different to the Sikh style one
|
Ian
Site Administrator
Registered: 28th Aug 99
Location: Liverpool
User status: Offline
|
Turbowned
|
LeeM
Member
Registered: 26th Sep 05
Location: Liverpool
User status: Offline
|
it kit be called something different by Muslims but I still thought it was a turban
|
dannymccann
Member
Registered: 9th Aug 06
Location: Doddington, Lincolnshire
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Ian
Turbowned
|
