corsasport.co.uk
 

Corsa Sport » Message Board » Help Zone, Modification and ICE Advice » C20XE vs. X20XEV


New Topic

New Poll
  Subscribe | Add to Favourites

You are not logged in and may not post or reply to messages. Please log in or create a new account or mail us about fixing an existing one - register@corsasport.co.uk

There are also many more features available when you are logged in such as private messages, buddy list, location services, post search and more.


Author C20XE vs. X20XEV
vitasport
Member

Registered: 3rd Apr 03
User status: Offline
17th Sep 03 at 18:11   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

i know very little about the 2L enfines.
so could any one tell me which eng. is better? and why?
Neshol
Member

Registered: 10th Jul 02
Location: Midlands
User status: Offline
17th Sep 03 at 18:20   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

C20XE is pre-Ecotec one, it's better cuz it's got more power! Ie. 150bhp compared to XEV's 135-ish.
vitasport
Member

Registered: 3rd Apr 03
User status: Offline
17th Sep 03 at 18:20   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

i know many of you have the C20XE conversion, but does any one know how they compare to the X20XEV? any info would be great!
Dan_Corsa
Member

Registered: 27th Nov 00
Location: preston,Lancashire
User status: Offline
17th Sep 03 at 18:21   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

the c20xe(red top) has 150bhp and about 150lb/ft of torque,where the x20xev has about 136bhp and alot less torque,the c20xev is the newer engine of the 2 and it all depends on what you want personally i'd go for the c20xe but thats based on the fact that i ain't bothered about how many miles a engines done etc,and i'd sooner have the power
vitasport
Member

Registered: 3rd Apr 03
User status: Offline
17th Sep 03 at 18:21   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

thanks! but wouldn't you think the newer ecotec eng. would be more reliable?
and-m
Member

Registered: 5th May 02
Location: Liverpool. Drives. Skud vRS.
User status: Offline
17th Sep 03 at 18:32   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

as long as its been serviced well dotn see a problem
miles
Member

Registered: 25th Mar 02
Location: plymouth Drives: Astra Sport
User status: Offline
17th Sep 03 at 18:44   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

The eco's make less power, but are newer. Weigh it up.

The red tops are older (more miles) but have more power and are a fair bit more tuneable.
vitasport
Member

Registered: 3rd Apr 03
User status: Offline
17th Sep 03 at 19:04   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

so, the x20xev is not a bad eng. then? less power but much newer.
CORSA NUT
Member

Registered: 3rd Aug 01
Location: Wirral
User status: Offline
17th Sep 03 at 19:09   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Were are you going to get an X from??
vitasport
Member

Registered: 3rd Apr 03
User status: Offline
17th Sep 03 at 19:14   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

astra? calibra? and etc? i just want to learn more about the 2L engines before taking the next step.
uprated
Member

Registered: 1st Sep 03
Location: York
User status: Offline
17th Sep 03 at 20:18   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

the guy in vauxhall, when my mum was getting her new corsa, told us the ecotec 1.2 had the same power as her old 1.4 pre eco engine, this being the reason she didnt get the 1.4 SRi.
bloody liar

 
New Topic

New Poll

  Related Threads Author Forum Replies Views Last Post
people laughting at x20xev in corsa , nothing to look at O2re General Chat 11 1390
6th Jul 03 at 10:49
by Daimo B
 
X20XEV Sam General Chat 13 1798
7th Jul 03 at 08:05
by Sam
 
Where can I source... Sam General Chat 35 2394
11th Jul 03 at 08:00
by Sam
 
calibra engines corsaboy_03 Help Zone, Modification and ICE Advice 37 5998
7th Sep 03 at 00:14
by MattyB
 
s reg 2ltr corsa - opinions on price m4tt_c Cars Offered 45 4135
13th Jan 04 at 12:33
by Darren M
 

Corsa Sport » Message Board » Help Zone, Modification and ICE Advice » C20XE vs. X20XEV 28 database queries in 0.0103819 seconds