bradfincham
Member
Registered: 20th Sep 02
Location: East Of England Drives: Clio 172
User status: Offline
|
Question:
If an aeroplane is taking off but is on a conveyor belt that is moving at the same speed as the plane, would the plane take off?
Just would like to see peoples responses
Its a question to get everyones minds thinking for once
[Edited on 23-05-2006 by bradfincham]
|
Pablo
Member
Registered: 3rd Feb 03
Location: Milton Keynes
User status: Offline
|
Depends if it was a Harrier or not
|
bradfincham
Member
Registered: 20th Sep 02
Location: East Of England Drives: Clio 172
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Pablo
Depends if it was a Harrier or not
Nope its a Boeing 737 for example
|
willay
Moderator Organiser: South East, National Events Premium Member
Registered: 10th Nov 02
Location: Roydon, Essex
User status: Offline
|
from my limited knowledge of everything i'd say it wouldnt.
|
Brett
Premium Member
Registered: 16th Dec 02
Location: Manchester
User status: Offline
|
no it wouldn't take off
|
C2RL R
Member
Registered: 28th Mar 02
Location: Redcliffe, QLD
User status: Offline
|
nope
|
Pablo
Member
Registered: 3rd Feb 03
Location: Milton Keynes
User status: Offline
|
Its nothing to do with the wheels as the wheels arent powered
|
Simon
Member
Registered: 24th Apr 03
Location: Oxfordshire
User status: Offline
|
ive got no idea, are you planning on marketing this idea if it does would mean wouldnt need big runways, idea could get of the ground
|
Jules S
Premium Member
Registered: 24th Dec 03
User status: Offline
|
This fcuking question has been posted on every forum I get on
And yes it will take off, can we leave it there please?
|
bradfincham
Member
Registered: 20th Sep 02
Location: East Of England Drives: Clio 172
User status: Offline
|
The answer is that it would work
Clue - how does an aeroplane produce thrust?
Clue - how does an aeroplane acheive lift?
|
Jason Iles
Member
Registered: 19th Jun 01
Location: Bristol
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Jules S
This fcuking question has been posted on every forum I get on
And yes it will take off, can we leave it there please?
|
bradfincham
Member
Registered: 20th Sep 02
Location: East Of England Drives: Clio 172
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Jules S
This fcuking question has been posted on every forum I get on
And yes it will take off, can we leave it there please?
I just want to see peoples opinions on here jules, stay out
|
Holly Olly
Member
Registered: 15th May 06
Location: Gosport, Hampshire
User status: Offline
|
No it wouldnt take off
|
JadeM
Premium Member
Registered: 9th Feb 06
User status: Offline
|
Prove it pleeeeze
|
bradfincham
Member
Registered: 20th Sep 02
Location: East Of England Drives: Clio 172
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Holly Olly
No it wouldnt take off
I just said that it would and gave some clues!
You must be blonde
|
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
|
no it wouldnt
|
Jules S
Premium Member
Registered: 24th Dec 03
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by bradfincham
quote: Originally posted by Jules S
This fcuking question has been posted on every forum I get on
And yes it will take off, can we leave it there please?
I just want to see peoples opinions on here jules, stay out
|
Paul_J
Member
Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
It would only take off if it lifted off the conveyor - if it's stuck to the conveyer and hence forced backwards as hard as it is pushing and forwards and therefore stationary - then there would be no air going under the wings to produce the lift.
however if it's sitting on the conveyor and the engines are at full speed and it detaches from the conveyor at all it may get the speed then needed to lift off - hence the same way a plane can use its jet engines at full speed to pull up high into the sky at take off
|
gianluigi
Member
Registered: 9th Mar 05
Location: Ipswich, Suffolk
User status: Offline
|
where's cybermonkey when you need him
|
Paul_J
Member
Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by gianluigi
where's cybermonkey when you need him
lol just what I thought Surely if just the engine's were enough to lift the plane without any actual movement forward (to get air under the wings) - then the plane should be able to sit on the run way, apply brakes and full thrust - release brakes and take off straight away. Which doesn't happen.
|
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Paul_J
It would only take off if it lifted off the conveyor - if it's stuck to the conveyer and hence forced backwards as hard as it is pushing and forwards and therefore stationary - then there would be no air going under the wings to produce the lift.
however if it's sitting on the conveyor and the engines are at full speed and it detaches from the conveyor at all it may get the speed then needed to lift off - hence the same way a plane can use its jet engines at full speed to pull up high into the sky at take off
what?? no mate. The aircraft is effectively stationary, it has no forward motion, there is no airflow over the wings, it cannot take off.
|
Paul_J
Member
Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Cybermonkey
quote: Originally posted by Paul_J
It would only take off if it lifted off the conveyor - if it's stuck to the conveyer and hence forced backwards as hard as it is pushing and forwards and therefore stationary - then there would be no air going under the wings to produce the lift.
however if it's sitting on the conveyor and the engines are at full speed and it detaches from the conveyor at all it may get the speed then needed to lift off - hence the same way a plane can use its jet engines at full speed to pull up high into the sky at take off
what?? no mate. The aircraft is effectively stationary, it has no forward motion, there is no airflow over the wings, it cannot take off.
yeh that's what I then said lower down on my next reply.
|
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Paul_J
quote: Originally posted by gianluigi
where's cybermonkey when you need him
lol just what I thought Surely if just the engine's were enough to lift the plane without any actual movement forward (to get air under the wings) - then the plane should be able to sit on the run way, apply brakes and full thrust - release brakes and take off straight away. Which doesn't happen.
FLMAO the engines only provide forward motion. even at full power, if the conveyor belt is negating the forward movement, the aircraft is stationary. an aircraft ONLY flies when it has a pressure difference between the upper and lower wing great enough to produce lift. Bernoullis principle
|
Jules S
Premium Member
Registered: 24th Dec 03
User status: Offline
|
Of course it will take off
It has jet engines ffs, the engines produce thrust through the air not the conveyor belt.
The contact between the wheels and road is irrelevant
|
Paul_J
Member
Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
I see what jules is saying - the plane would still move forward?
|