Aaron
Member
Registered: 9th Aug 04
Location: Cottingham, East Riding
User status: Offline
|
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/w/west_ham_utd/6594613.stm
|
Conway563
Member
Registered: 7th Jun 06
Location: Yate, Bristol
User status: Offline
|
Seems alright but I just want to know if something will now happen to Liverpool about Mascherano as it should. How is it hes allowed to play in the champions league as well when he's already played in the UEFA Cup? 
[Edited on 27-04-2007 by Branners]
|
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
|
Shouldve been points.
What's £5.5million to a team with a multi millionaire owner. It's like when the FA fine players £2k for improper conduct? £2k is pennies to any Premiership footballer, not a punishment at all.
|
Tarrantino
Member
Registered: 29th Sep 04
Location: Essex
User status: Offline
|
Surely liverpool should be fined as well then?
|
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
|
Yeah that is also a curious one.
Lets hope Cosmotron can shed some light.
|
Edd
Member
Registered: 8th Nov 04
Location: Glasgow
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Nath
Yeah that is also a curious one.
Lets hope Cosmotron can shed some light.
quote:
Originally posted by Cosmo
No liverpool are the best team in the world and shouldnt be fined infact they should be given the 5.5 million for being the bestest team in the world
 
|
liamC
Member
Registered: 28th Feb 04
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Tarrantino
Surely liverpool should be fined as well then?
Exactly right. Nail on head.
Won't happen though, the dippers are one of the top 4 and the FA won't want to make them angry.
|
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
|
Are the UEFA Cup and CL considered two different things, bit like the FA Cup and League Cup? If you play in the FA Cup for one team, i'm assuming you can feature in the League Cup for a different one, if transferred.
|
jr
Member
Registered: 20th May 02
Location: Kent
User status: Offline
|
we have got 24 hours to resign tevez as well 
|
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
|
Whats the deal with Tevez?
|
jr
Member
Registered: 20th May 02
Location: Kent
User status: Offline
|
apprentley his contract has been terminated as part of the fine, but that was started by skysports
|
Rachel H
Member
Registered: 12th Nov 03
Location: Berks
User status: Offline
|
Shouldn't have been in the Premiership in the first place 
|
jr
Member
Registered: 20th May 02
Location: Kent
User status: Offline
|
The Premier League have said they will not be banning Tevez from playing again for West Ham this season.
They will also allow Tevez to remain registered with the club.
But ONLY if we remove the "third party ownership" from Tevez
|
Jamescorsa97
Member
Registered: 19th Aug 04
Location: Middlesbrough Drives: Cliosport 182
User status: Offline
|
Disgrace.
1997 - Middlesbrough deducted 3 points(Relegated)
|
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
|
Why stop at just 'boro. So many teams have been shafted by points for lesser incidents.
One rule for the 'big' clubs, another for everyone else.
Leeds for example fielded SIX loanees when the rules state FIVE is the maximum. Their punishment? £2,000 fine, half of which was suspended. Granted they lost the game in which that happened, but what a shit punishment!!
[Edited on 27-04-2007 by Nath]
|
jr
Member
Registered: 20th May 02
Location: Kent
User status: Offline
|
Sorry but unless everyone knows all the facts i cant see how people can say disgrace
|
Jamescorsa97
Member
Registered: 19th Aug 04
Location: Middlesbrough Drives: Cliosport 182
User status: Offline
|
Because it's more or less cheating.
|
jr
Member
Registered: 20th May 02
Location: Kent
User status: Offline
|
where did you get that from, technically not cheating, as the FA wernt even sure of there own rules
TBh i cant see how its cheating, when the FA couldnt understadn the in's and outs of the B13 rule, as knowone has ever been it this situation before
also i cant see how you lot can say just dock them points, where EVERYONE involved with the deal, has nothing to do with the club anymore
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
From what I know....
Liverpool have basically bought him for 18months for a set price (have heard its from 2mil upto 12mil), after this the contract goes back to the previous owners and we have the first refusal to buy him for an already agreed price.
Put it this way, somehow we have agreed with the league the correct way to have him....it took them an extra 5wks after the tranfer window to agree with it but agree with it they did.
|
strick206
Member
Registered: 12th Apr 07
Location: Wigan Drives:Integra DC5
User status: Offline
|
i heard liverpool are in the clear as they have done it properly
but imo if they have broken rules, it should be points deducted, as that fine isnt going to trouble the owner too much, plus if they stay in the premiership they'll get more than that anyway
|
jr
Member
Registered: 20th May 02
Location: Kent
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Cosmo
From what I know....
Liverpool have basically bought him for 18months for a set price (have heard its from 2mil upto 12mil), after this the contract goes back to the previous owners and we have the first refusal to buy him for an already agreed price.
Put it this way, somehow we have agreed with the league the correct way to have him....it took them an extra 5wks after the tranfer window to agree with it but agree with it they did.
and i think thats where it went wrong cosmo, it took 5 weeks as the FA didnt understand there own rules, and were possibly going to agree to the deal, despite it going agaist the rule book, if you see what i mean
|
jr
Member
Registered: 20th May 02
Location: Kent
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by strick206
i heard liverpool are in the clear as they have done it properly
but imo if they have broken rules, it should be points deducted, as that fine isnt going to trouble the owner too much, plus if they stay in the premiership they'll get more than that anyway
But the owner isnt the one that signed the players, it was our dodgy old chairman, who now has NOTHING to do with the club
IMO, biased as it may be, if one of my workmates fucked up and left, i wouldnt expect to get their punishment for the fuck up
|
strick206
Member
Registered: 12th Apr 07
Location: Wigan Drives:Integra DC5
User status: Offline
|
ok, i didnt know all the details
but fining the club is in effect punishing the new owner
deducting points is punishing the club
|
jr
Member
Registered: 20th May 02
Location: Kent
User status: Offline
|
IMo the club dont deserve to be punished when the whole board arent there, egg said that if he was in charge the deals would have never been done in that way when he joined
Brown and alldridge deserve everything IMO
|
Rachel H
Member
Registered: 12th Nov 03
Location: Berks
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Nath
Why stop at just 'boro. So many teams have been shafted by points for lesser incidents.
One rule for the 'big' clubs, another for everyone else.
Leeds for example fielded SIX loanees when the rules state FIVE is the maximum. Their punishment? £2,000 fine, half of which was suspended. Granted they lost the game in which that happened, but what a shit punishment!!
[Edited on 27-04-2007 by Nath]
Fuck Leeds, they will be relegated tomorrow 
|
