TheCam
Member
Registered: 16th Mar 07
Location: Kirkcaldy
User status: Offline
|
rough power on the below spec
'97 saxo vts
chipped
powerboost valve
gmc free power unit fitted - what is this??
stainlss steel exhaust straight through with 4 branch manifold
ported and polished throtle body
induction kit
|
Scotty C
Member
Registered: 6th Nov 05
Location: Kidderminster Drives: 1.6 16v Sport
User status: Offline
|
Is that phase two? that make makes a big difference.
|
Twiggy
Member
Registered: 15th Oct 04
User status: Offline
|
140
|
Scotty C
Member
Registered: 6th Nov 05
Location: Kidderminster Drives: 1.6 16v Sport
User status: Offline
|
No chance, the only gain you're going to get is from the exhaust, and the chip is proberly from ebay.
|
Eck
Premium Member
Registered: 17th Apr 06
Location: Lundin Links, Fife
User status: Offline
|
I'd say at least 130 Greame.
|
TheCam
Member
Registered: 16th Mar 07
Location: Kirkcaldy
User status: Offline
|
thanks folks
monsssta - phase 1 mate
|
Dean B
Member
Registered: 23rd Aug 06
Location: Lincolnshire
User status: Offline
|
140 IMO. These engines see good gains from a filter, exhuast system and manifold.
|
Scotty C
Member
Registered: 6th Nov 05
Location: Kidderminster Drives: 1.6 16v Sport
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Dean B
140 IMO. These engines see good gains from a filter, exhuast system and manifold.
Enclosed filter, yes. not a induction kit.
Phase one's have a EGR valve, phase two doesn't with a better head design, meaning more bhp - 128bhp odd
|
Dean B
Member
Registered: 23rd Aug 06
Location: Lincolnshire
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Monster
quote: Originally posted by Dean B
140 IMO. These engines see good gains from a filter, exhuast system and manifold.
Enclosed filter, yes. not a induction kit.
Phase one's have a EGR valve, phase two doesn't with a better head design, meaning more bhp - 128bhp odd
Most people will agree he sould still see 140 bhp. As stated many times before. How many of these engine actually roll at 120bhp to start with. Very few there always above.
|
Eck
Premium Member
Registered: 17th Apr 06
Location: Lundin Links, Fife
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Monster
quote: Originally posted by Dean B
140 IMO. These engines see good gains from a filter, exhuast system and manifold.
Enclosed filter, yes. not a induction kit.
Phase one's have a EGR valve, phase two doesn't with a better head design, meaning more bhp - 128bhp odd
But you don't know if that is an enclosed or not Scott. Same with the superchip. Might be a chipped and remaped ECU? Need more info Greame
|
TheCam
Member
Registered: 16th Mar 07
Location: Kirkcaldy
User status: Offline
|
i dont have any eck it isnt an enclosed filter. I may be swapping my bike and some cash for it... 2 seconds I'll get a link
|
Scotty C
Member
Registered: 6th Nov 05
Location: Kidderminster Drives: 1.6 16v Sport
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Dean B
quote: Originally posted by Monster
quote: Originally posted by Dean B
140 IMO. These engines see good gains from a filter, exhuast system and manifold.
Enclosed filter, yes. not a induction kit.
Phase one's have a EGR valve, phase two doesn't with a better head design, meaning more bhp - 128bhp odd
Most people will agree he sould still see 140 bhp. As stated many times before. How many of these engine actually roll at 120bhp to start with. Very few there always above.
So 20bhp odd from a manifold and full system? Yeah right....
|
Scotty C
Member
Registered: 6th Nov 05
Location: Kidderminster Drives: 1.6 16v Sport
User status: Offline
|
Enclosed filter and your looking at a bhp increase, not a crappy induction kit.
|
TheCam
Member
Registered: 16th Mar 07
Location: Kirkcaldy
User status: Offline
|
http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/310448.htm
this one here,
It is coming with standard interior and mirrors.
I will be putting standard bonnet back on, standard lights and vts wheels,
what do you lot think?
[Edited on 12-12-2007 by TheCam]
|
craig_s
Member
Registered: 5th Mar 06
Location: Birmingham Drives: mk4 astra gsi
User status: Offline
|
i'll say 130 at the most.plus it's probably had a hard life.
|
Dean B
Member
Registered: 23rd Aug 06
Location: Lincolnshire
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Monster
quote: Originally posted by Dean B
quote: Originally posted by Monster
quote: Originally posted by Dean B
140 IMO. These engines see good gains from a filter, exhuast system and manifold.
Enclosed filter, yes. not a induction kit.
Phase one's have a EGR valve, phase two doesn't with a better head design, meaning more bhp - 128bhp odd
Most people will agree he sould still see 140 bhp. As stated many times before. How many of these engine actually roll at 120bhp to start with. Very few there always above.
So 20bhp odd from a manifold and full system? Yeah right....
Can you read?
He states:
Filter, doesn't say if it's enclosed or open cone.
Chipped.
Them FOUR modifications may add 20 bhp on that engine. They get much better gains, just because you don't get that on a x16xe doesn't mean it can't be achivied a gti lump.
|
Eck
Premium Member
Registered: 17th Apr 06
Location: Lundin Links, Fife
User status: Offline
|
Tbh Greame that seems overpriced to me. NOS or not.
|
Scotty C
Member
Registered: 6th Nov 05
Location: Kidderminster Drives: 1.6 16v Sport
User status: Offline
|
He says a open one. you'll need a remap to get any noticeable gain from a superchip..
I agree Phase two's will see 140bhp with enclosed filter, manifold and full system.
|
Dean B
Member
Registered: 23rd Aug 06
Location: Lincolnshire
User status: Offline
|
And since when does an engine produce the exact amount of power the spec says. Like i said earlier, they always seem to put out more power than 120bhp. Therefore if its say 125bhp before the modification, its only a 15bhp gain from said modifications.
|
Eck
Premium Member
Registered: 17th Apr 06
Location: Lundin Links, Fife
User status: Offline
|
It's a bit vague to judge power tbh. But a Phase 1 VTS with 95k for £2,500? I'd walk away mate.
|
TheCam
Member
Registered: 16th Mar 07
Location: Kirkcaldy
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Eckmcmann
Tbh Greame that seems overpriced to me. NOS or not.
I'm not paying that much mate
|
Dean B
Member
Registered: 23rd Aug 06
Location: Lincolnshire
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Eckmcmann
It's a bit vague to judge power tbh. But a Phase 1 VTS with 95k for £2,500? I'd walk away mate.
For sure. Phase 2's arnt expensive and imo look much nicer.
[Edited on 12-12-2007 by Dean B]
|
craig_s
Member
Registered: 5th Mar 06
Location: Birmingham Drives: mk4 astra gsi
User status: Offline
|
they may produce that when they are new.but it's unlikely a 9-10 year old car will produce the quoted std bhp.
|
Scotty C
Member
Registered: 6th Nov 05
Location: Kidderminster Drives: 1.6 16v Sport
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Dean B
And since when does an engine produce the exact amount of power the spec says. Like i said earlier, they always seem to put out more power than 120bhp. Therefore if its say 125bhp before the modification, its only a 15bhp gain from said modifications.
But were going from what Citreon state here...
Oh, bearing in mind it's 10 years old and got atleast 60k on the engine, it proberly isn't even making standard power (if it was standard)
|
Dean B
Member
Registered: 23rd Aug 06
Location: Lincolnshire
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Monster
quote: Originally posted by Dean B
And since when does an engine produce the exact amount of power the spec says. Like i said earlier, they always seem to put out more power than 120bhp. Therefore if its say 125bhp before the modification, its only a 15bhp gain from said modifications.
But were going from what Citreon state here...
Oh, bearing in mind it's 10 years old and got atleast 60k on the engine, it proberly isn't even making standard power (if it was standard)
If it's been look after and serviced regularly. Age isn't an issue.
|