Patrick
Member
Registered: 25th Apr 02
Location: SE London
User status: Offline
|
Anyone know what one of these does a 1/4 in standard?
i.e. anyone got one or knows someone with one!
Also, anyone know whether there is a throttle bodies kit that can be modified to fit this engine?
Cheers...
|
Ditch
Member
Registered: 29th Nov 02
Location: St Albans Drives: JDM Celica GT4 WRC
User status: Offline
|
not help but another question!!
how is the 2.2 astra SRi engine different to the 2.2 engine vauxhall put in the astra coupe?? Is it same thing??
|
Demo
Member
Registered: 27th Sep 01
Location: south wales Drives: astra sri ecoflex
User status: Offline
|
i think the 2.2 unit in both the astra and the coupe is the same as the 2.2 unit in the vectra with the aluminium block and manifold that comes out of the back of the engine
|
vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
not to bad I think 8.5s to 60 137 mph. probably high 16s 1/4.
|
Ditch
Member
Registered: 29th Nov 02
Location: St Albans Drives: JDM Celica GT4 WRC
User status: Offline
|
Ye they are not that impressive compared to alot of other car manufacturers 2ltr lumps
|
Patrick
Member
Registered: 25th Apr 02
Location: SE London
User status: Offline
|
High 16's!!
Thought they would at least be high 15's
|
lacky75
Member
Registered: 8th Dec 02
Location: Norwich
User status: Offline
|
isnt the 2 liter version cheaper to buy and only slightly slower 8.9 compared to 8.5?
somthing to think about!
|
vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Patrick
High 16's!!
Thought they would at least be high 15's
no don;t be daft. I totally raped one at crail
|
Patrick
Member
Registered: 25th Apr 02
Location: SE London
User status: Offline
|
Looks like I'm definately getting the Gsi then!
|
Lregnovagsi
Member
Registered: 24th Feb 03
Location: west yorkshire
User status: Offline
|
don't get the 2.2 sri, my boyfriend had one that i used for a few months, and it was soooo slow!!!! Might be to do with the 18''s and a 100+mm drop, but my nova felt bloody faster!
|
CORSA NUT
Member
Registered: 3rd Aug 01
Location: Wirral
User status: Offline
|
What about an SRI Turbo in black Patrick??
Seen one today looked fukin MINT
|
Patrick
Member
Registered: 25th Apr 02
Location: SE London
User status: Offline
|
Saw one what? For sale??
|
CORSA NUT
Member
Registered: 3rd Aug 01
Location: Wirral
User status: Offline
|
No mate just seen one near me.Looks lot better than a GSI to me
|
CORSA NUT
Member
Registered: 3rd Aug 01
Location: Wirral
User status: Offline
|
Have a look at this
http://www.aylesburyvale.net/motoring/article.asp?ArticleID=96
|
Sooty
Banned
Registered: 9th Mar 03
Location: FLAP CENTRAL
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Lregnovagsi
don't get the 2.2 sri, my boyfriend had one that i used for a few months, and it was soooo slow!!!! Might be to do with the 18''s and a 100+mm drop, but my nova felt bloody faster!
You make me laugh so much
|
vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
maybe his nova was a 1.5tf with a bleed valve
|
paul_spurrell
Member
Registered: 14th Sep 01
Location: Bath Avon
User status: Offline
|
the astra 1.8 is 0-60 in 8.5 seconds and the 2.2 0-60 is 8 seconds. its pants
|
Sooty
Banned
Registered: 9th Mar 03
Location: FLAP CENTRAL
User status: Offline
|
Its, not a 0-60 car.... pulls better after 70.
Nova's are shite
|
Patrick
Member
Registered: 25th Apr 02
Location: SE London
User status: Offline
|
The reason the 1.8 16v is 8.7 and the 2.2 is 8.2 to 60mph is because the 1.8 16v is fitted with a close ratio gearbox and the 2.2 16v isn't.
Fuck knows why? If they put the close ratio box on the 2.2 I reckon it would be 7.9 easy.
Don't care anymore now. Just gonna get the Gsi. That will be doing 13's by the time I've finished!
|
MatG
Member
Registered: 26th Apr 02
Location: Birmingham UK
User status: Offline
|
the 2.2 ecotecs have been in the USA for a long time and tunning parts for these are in abundance over there, it wont be long untill they come here some of the yanks have got 700BHP out of them (admittedly drag cars) but the potenianal is there.
Put it this way courtenay have more faith in the 2.2 which they are developing a turbo for then the 2.0 turbo.
Quick fix plus speed get the turbo
Long term get the 2.2
[Edited on 14-04-2003 by MatG]
|
Daimo B
Member
Registered: 20th Mar 00
User status: Offline
|
2.2 has more torque than a standard 2.0litre redtop (C20XE) though. Slightly less bhp (145 i think). But, again, like the 2.0litre, there are Throttle Body and supercharger kits being devolped, cams etc. There was a post on mig months ago about an american company taking the engine, tuning it, and noting what part shattered at what rpm. Had a chart on there, was really good. Engine can be tuned mentally (using race fuel etc) to 800bhp and a VERY big hole in the wallet.
|
vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
the 1.8 is quite slow
|
paul_spurrell
Member
Registered: 14th Sep 01
Location: Bath Avon
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by vibrio
the 1.8 is quite slow
if you compare it to a car roughly the same, say a focus. its not that bad really seeing as its only 12k
|
mattyboy199
Member
Registered: 5th Feb 03
User status: Offline
|
147 bhp actually. 2.2Turbo would be nice courtney ?
|
vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by paul_spurrell
quote: Originally posted by vibrio
the 1.8 is quite slow
if you compare it to a car roughly the same, say a focus. its not that bad really seeing as its only 12k
still slow in the general aspect though is it not
|