Nic Barnes
Member
Registered: 5th Apr 04
Location: nowhere near ginger people
User status: Offline
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_eqCUZnhAzQ&feature=youtu.be
reckon it does 60 in 6 or just under 
shit set off as well tbh
|
Jamie-C
Member
Registered: 3rd Jun 08
Location: Ballycastle
User status: Offline
|
Great video. Well worth a watch.
|
Nic Barnes
Member
Registered: 5th Apr 04
Location: nowhere near ginger people
User status: Offline
|
I just wondered how fast it got to 60 using official timing gear. Ain't bad IMHO.
|
Matty SRi
Member
Registered: 3rd Dec 08
Location: Stockton-on-Tees Drives: Mk3 Golf GTi
User status: Offline
|
not bad for a derv
|
SetH
Member
Registered: 15th Jul 01
User status: Offline
|
Probably faster than mine looking at that. Is it mapped I can't remember?
|
SportBoy
Member
Registered: 5th Oct 01
Location: Retford, Nottinghamshire
User status: Offline
|
That barge might trouble my barge.
|
Nic Barnes
Member
Registered: 5th Apr 04
Location: nowhere near ginger people
User status: Offline
|
Yeah it's mapped not had it on dyno yet though. Maybe 230bhp
|
harrisp
Member
Registered: 15th Dec 07
Location: Derbyshire
User status: Offline
|
I think the would probably upset me in my 330i
|
taylorboosh
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 07
User status: Offline
|
why are your high beam on?
it looks fast
|
richc
Member
Registered: 24th Mar 07
Location: Ilkeston
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by john-d
why are your high beam on?
it looks fast
They dont have many lights in cumbria.
|
taylorboosh
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 07
User status: Offline
|
nics 330d remaped - 230bhp / 1615kg x 1000kg = 142.4 bhp per tonne
steves puma - 130bhp / 800kg x 1000kg = 162.5 bhp per tonne
your car can do 0-60 in 6 secs put steves cant? even though his has a considerably better power to weight
[Edited on 21-07-2012 by john-d]
|
Nic Barnes
Member
Registered: 5th Apr 04
Location: nowhere near ginger people
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by john-d
why are your high beam on?
it looks fast
Because it was dark, due to it being night time, and in the middle of the countryside.
|
Nic Barnes
Member
Registered: 5th Apr 04
Location: nowhere near ginger people
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by john-d
nics 330d remaped - 230bhp / 1615kg x 1000kg = 142.4 bhp per tonne
steves puma - 130bhp / 800kg x 1000kg = 162.5 bhp per tonne
your car can do 0-60 in 6 secs put steves cant? even though his has a considerably better power to weight
[Edited on 21-07-2012 by john-d]
Rwd plus you're missing out the 400lb/ft or more of torque I have. Being diesel, that's far more relevant than the bhp. Just so we are clear, you've not got a clue what you're talking about.
|
taylorboosh
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 07
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Nic Barnes
quote:
Originally posted by john-d
why are your high beam on?
it looks fast
Because it was dark, due to it being night time, and in the middle of the countryside.
fair do's, still looks fast. i think in gear it will keep up with me for a bit
|
taylorboosh
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 07
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Nic Barnes
quote:
Originally posted by john-d
nics 330d remaped - 230bhp / 1615kg x 1000kg = 142.4 bhp per tonne
steves puma - 130bhp / 800kg x 1000kg = 162.5 bhp per tonne
your car can do 0-60 in 6 secs put steves cant? even though his has a considerably better power to weight
[Edited on 21-07-2012 by john-d]
Rwd plus you're missing out the 400lb/ft or more of torque I have. Being diesel, that's far more relevant than the bhp. Just so we are clear, you've not got a clue what you're talking about.
i wouldnt imagine steves spins up hugely with only 130 bhp tbh... obviously you know a lot more on the subject than i do tbh, i would also imagine steve can do 60 in 2nd... can you?no baiting btw, generally wondering how you can fully say his car does 0-60 in 8 secs but yours does it in 6
|
taylorboosh
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 07
User status: Offline
|
ep3 type r - 198bhp / 1210kg x 1000kg = 163.6bhp
puma torque - 116 ft lb
civic torque - 145 ft lb
bet steves is pretty close to sevens or high sixes 0-60
ep3 type r 0-60 = 6.6 secs
|
Nic Barnes
Member
Registered: 5th Apr 04
Location: nowhere near ginger people
User status: Offline
|
I'm in 3rd to get to 60. I'm choosing to ignore your pathetic bait. Knew one of you cunts would try and ruin another of my treads ffs.
|
taylorboosh
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 07
User status: Offline
|
how is this any differant to you telling him in his thread that he couldnt do 0-60 in six seconds....
you have an extra gear change too... i never knew torque made so much differance
|
harrisp
Member
Registered: 15th Dec 07
Location: Derbyshire
User status: Offline
|
a 330 petrol does 60 in 6.3 seconds according to parkers, so how is it hard to believe that something with similar power and a lot more torque do that sort of time?
|
Tom G
Member
Registered: 4th Aug 08
Location: Cheshire
User status: Offline
|
John put down the calculator.
|
taylorboosh
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 07
User status: Offline
|
it 100% doesnt do it in 6.3 seconds, ive driven a few and they arent fast
|
taylorboosh
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 07
User status: Offline
|
im also not saying, nor have i ever said that nics wrong about his car. im saying, that if he believs his can do it then why cant steves
|
Nic Barnes
Member
Registered: 5th Apr 04
Location: nowhere near ginger people
User status: Offline
|
Seems the new spam game on here is to turn every thread into being about Steve and his puma. I don't care and show no interest in Steve or his puma so give your games a rest John.
|
taylorboosh
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 07
User status: Offline
|
is it balls nic, you cant justify why you think his wont be that fast when given stats.... your all quick to post shit in his threads
seems like you dont want people to disagree or remember things youv said in the past m8
|
Steve
Premium Member
Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
|
another thread ruined by troll banter ffs
|
