AndyCorsaC
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 03
Location: Batley, West Yorkshire
User status: Offline
|
i tested my corsa c 1.0 12v last night and got 14 seconds is this about right or is it slow
|
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
|
16 seconds probably. Its not really worth finding out though mate, its just slow as shit. simple as.
|
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
|
how did you test it?
|
AndyCorsaC
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 03
Location: Batley, West Yorkshire
User status: Offline
|
on a dual carriage way there was a layby so i pulled in waited for a gap and my mate timed it for me
|
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
|
not accurate though is it.
|
AndyCorsaC
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 03
Location: Batley, West Yorkshire
User status: Offline
|
why cause i waited until i made sure it was on 60 and it was a proper watch
|
vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by evzyboy
i tested my corsa c 1.0 12v last night and got 14 seconds is this about right or is it slow
It is slow
|
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
|
for gods sake. Its not accurate. And it should be 0-62
|
Paul H
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 03
Location: Lincoln.
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by vibrio
quote: Originally posted by evzyboy
i tested my corsa c 1.0 12v last night and got 14 seconds is this about right or is it slow
It is slow
this is true.so is my sxi
|
AndyCorsaC
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 03
Location: Batley, West Yorkshire
User status: Offline
|
so what time should i be looking at then
|
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
|
16 seconds.
|
AndyCorsaC
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 03
Location: Batley, West Yorkshire
User status: Offline
|
ok what suggestions do you have for improving the power apart from gettin a new engine
|
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
|
you cant. get a new engine
|
AndyCorsaC
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 03
Location: Batley, West Yorkshire
User status: Offline
|
well what have u done to yours it looks standard 1.6 16v
|
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
|
yours is a 1.0 12v. Totally slow and 55bhp. Not good. Mine is 1.6 16v with 108bhp. 0-60in 8.7 seconds. Pulls like a train. I have a modded airbox. I cant mod it since im selling it to emmigrate to australia
|
AndyCorsaC
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 03
Location: Batley, West Yorkshire
User status: Offline
|
actually 57 bhp lol
|
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
|
aaaah right. that powerful eh
|
AndyCorsaC
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 03
Location: Batley, West Yorkshire
User status: Offline
|
but im gettin my go faster stripes soon that will add 20 bhp lol
|
Paul H
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 03
Location: Lincoln.
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by evzyboy
actually 57 bhp lol
get it right m8 there 58 bhp.soooo much power
|
AndyCorsaC
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 03
Location: Batley, West Yorkshire
User status: Offline
|
ooh that much i priveliged aint i lol
|
lacky75
Member
Registered: 8th Dec 02
Location: Norwich
User status: Offline
|
dbillas (i think)? bought out an inlet manifold for this engine i heard it was meant to up the bhp and torque to that of a 1.2 16v (75bhp and 80ish nm torque).
maybe its worth going a search for this?? but to be honest ur best selling the car and buying one with a bigger more tuneable engine.
BTBH its not worth the money in tuning your car 1.0 to the performance of a 1.2 16v when its better that u spend the money on insurance for a more powerful car.
|
Gambit
Member
Registered: 5th Jun 00
Location: Common Sense HQ
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by evzyboy
why cause i waited until i made sure it was on 60 and it was a proper watch
pheww! for a minute there i thought you were timing it with one of those sweetie watches that you put on your wrist!
[Edited on 16-10-2003 by Gambit]
|
Tom
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: Wirral, Merseyside
User status: Offline
|
I was laughing at that reply too gambit
|
Gambit
Member
Registered: 5th Jun 00
Location: Common Sense HQ
User status: Offline
|
maybe he should concentrate on getting a proper car then he'd have something to time with his proper watch
|
lacky75
Member
Registered: 8th Dec 02
Location: Norwich
User status: Offline
|
timing by a watch (even a rolex) is really inaccurate.
Due to the following.
:- Reaction time of person holding the watch
:- Inacuracy of the speedo
:- The needle on the speedo takes a few .'s of a second
to catch up with the true speed the cars going
Thats why people take there cars to an official site with official (and accurate timing gear)
|