corsasport.co.uk
 

Corsa Sport » Message Board » General Chat » Turbo's not so fast!!


New Topic

New Poll
  <<  1    2    3  >> Subscribe | Add to Favourites

You are not logged in and may not post or reply to messages. Please log in or create a new account or mail us about fixing an existing one - register@corsasport.co.uk

There are also many more features available when you are logged in such as private messages, buddy list, location services, post search and more.


Author Turbo's not so fast!!
Daimo B
Member

Registered: 20th Mar 00
User status: Offline
8th Dec 03 at 13:58   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

3.0, 6 cylinders, lots of umph, 24v
2.0, 4 cyclinder, lots of umph, 16v

I should hope you should beat him, but tbh, both running well at full chat, it would be close. Both extremly powerfull engines for a small car. Turbo would deffo be quicker from 0-110 odd, but if both were on teh move from say 60mph odd, ooooooo, wouldn't wanna say really, it would be close.

Long enough road and both cars should see 150mph odd.

But at the end of the day, does it really matter? Both had a lot of ££ spent and both very quick.

Oh, ps, an XE is slower than a LET. AK, u might have beaten craig over a 1/4, but urs aint exatly standard

U just need the maths
150bhp 2.0 16v
204bhp 2.0 16v (with turbo).

Its obvious the turbo SHOULD win every tiem over an XE, but always depends. Sh1t start, fucked gearchange, loss of power suddenly, lots of different things.
MattyB
Member

Registered: 13th Nov 01
Location: 118.5bhp :D
User status: Offline
8th Dec 03 at 14:12   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Daimo - he didnt race him in a 3.0 v6 corsa.....he race was:

c20xe corsa Vs c20let corsa

appararently the xe kept up
vibrio
Banned

Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
8th Dec 03 at 14:13   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by Adam Kindness
my old xe kept up with (beat on 1/4) craigPCG's car when it wasnt running as it should....

once he had fixed it (and upped the boost) he raped my ass



yes remember I beat you that day
vibrio
Banned

Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
8th Dec 03 at 14:15   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by Daimo B
3.0, 6 cylinders, lots of umph, 24v
2.0, 4 cyclinder, lots of umph, 16v

I should hope you should beat him, but tbh, both running well at full chat, it would be close. Both extremly powerfull engines for a small car. Turbo would deffo be quicker from 0-110 odd, but if both were on teh move from say 60mph odd, ooooooo, wouldn't wanna say really, it would be close.

Long enough road and both cars should see 150mph odd.

But at the end of the day, does it really matter? Both had a lot of ££ spent and both very quick.

Oh, ps, an XE is slower than a LET. AK, u might have beaten craig over a 1/4, but urs aint exatly standard

U just need the maths
150bhp 2.0 16v
204bhp 2.0 16v (with turbo).

Its obvious the turbo SHOULD win every tiem over an XE, but always depends. Sh1t start, fucked gearchange, loss of power suddenly, lots of different things.



150mph out of an XE, AK's is off the clock 135mph @ 7000rpm
vibrio
Banned

Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
8th Dec 03 at 14:15   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

XE around 14.8s 1/4
LET around 13.8s 1/4


huge difference. LET would rape a XE any speed
Daimo B
Member

Registered: 20th Mar 00
User status: Offline
8th Dec 03 at 14:17   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by MattyB
Daimo - he didnt race him in a 3.0 v6 corsa.....he race was:

c20xe corsa Vs c20let corsa

appararently the xe kept up


Oh in that case im just going
XE just wouldn't stand a chance.

Drove a calibra the other week. Transfer box was knackard so 2wd (Front), running awful, and on 17s, and its a calibra so much bigger than my corsa.

IT was MUCH faster. Would have left my corsa standing even running how it was.

An XE wouldn't stand a chance against a LET.

Chances over a 1.4 mile?

LET would need 17/18s and have full interior
XE would need 15s, a dam good start and be stripped out big style.
Marc D
Member

Registered: 29th Apr 03
Location: Wirral, Merseyside
User status: Offline
8th Dec 03 at 14:18   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

or XE tuned to fuck
Daimo B
Member

Registered: 20th Mar 00
User status: Offline
8th Dec 03 at 14:19   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by vibrio
quote:
Originally posted by Daimo B
3.0, 6 cylinders, lots of umph, 24v
2.0, 4 cyclinder, lots of umph, 16v

I should hope you should beat him, but tbh, both running well at full chat, it would be close. Both extremly powerfull engines for a small car. Turbo would deffo be quicker from 0-110 odd, but if both were on teh move from say 60mph odd, ooooooo, wouldn't wanna say really, it would be close.

Long enough road and both cars should see 150mph odd.
.



150mph out of an XE, AK's is off the clock 135mph @ 7000rpm


Read it again
vibrio
Banned

Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
8th Dec 03 at 14:23   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by Daimo B
quote:
Originally posted by vibrio
quote:
Originally posted by Daimo B
3.0, 6 cylinders, lots of umph, 24v
2.0, 4 cyclinder, lots of umph, 16v

I should hope you should beat him, but tbh, both running well at full chat, it would be close. Both extremly powerfull engines for a small car. Turbo would deffo be quicker from 0-110 odd, but if both were on teh move from say 60mph odd, ooooooo, wouldn't wanna say really, it would be close.

Long enough road and both cars should see 150mph odd.
.



150mph out of an XE, AK's is off the clock 135mph @ 7000rpm


Read it again



nope at top

3.0, 6 cylinders, lots of umph, 24v
2.0, 4 cyclinder, lots of umph, 16v





also that 3.0L is slower than an XE over the 1/4 from the times I have seen



[Edited on 08-12-2003 by vibrio]
The Guru
Member

Registered: 8th Jul 03
User status: Offline
8th Dec 03 at 14:27   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by MattyB
Daimo - he didnt race him in a 3.0 v6 corsa.....he race was:

c20xe corsa Vs c20let corsa

appararently the xe kept up


NO.. aparently I past him!
Daimo B
Member

Registered: 20th Mar 00
User status: Offline
8th Dec 03 at 14:31   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by vibrio
nope at top

3.0, 6 cylinders, lots of umph, 24v
2.0, 4 cyclinder, lots of umph, 16v


also that 3.0L is slower than an XE over the 1/4 from the times I have seen

[Edited on 08-12-2003 by vibrio]


V6 engines in vauxhalls never give good 0-60 or 1/4 mile times in respect of the cc. But get on a motorway and the V6's go on and on and on.
The Guru
Member

Registered: 8th Jul 03
User status: Offline
8th Dec 03 at 14:35   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Eh.. whys everyone on about my brothers V6?.. yes its not superb on 1/4mile but awesome on motorway! and quite clearly if I managed to beat this 2.0 turbo the the V6 would hump it! lol
vibrio
Banned

Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
8th Dec 03 at 14:38   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

put it this way you'd struggle to beat me in my GT on the motorway. he could not have been trying or thought you were just a normal corsa so left it in top gear
The Guru
Member

Registered: 8th Jul 03
User status: Offline
8th Dec 03 at 14:45   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

I know him.. we were at school together.. saw him a few weeks ago and he says "hows yur 2.0".. that tends to make me think he knows! and he's the type of guy that will try!
The Guru
Member

Registered: 8th Jul 03
User status: Offline
8th Dec 03 at 14:46   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Ok tell you what.. I'll go hunt it down and fcuk it again!
miss_bravo
Member

Registered: 26th Jan 03
Location: Falkirk, Scotland
User status: Offline
8th Dec 03 at 14:49   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by vibrio
put it this way you'd struggle to beat me in my GT on the motorway. he could not have been trying or thought you were just a normal corsa so left it in top gear


The guy in the let corsa knew what The Guru was running I heard about it later on up the town and the guy was quite embarrassed about it all
The Guru
Member

Registered: 8th Jul 03
User status: Offline
8th Dec 03 at 14:55   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

LMFAO at the Muff mobile!

Miss Bravo do you know who the guy in the 4x4 Cossie was? I need to have a chat. Muf knowns fine well whats in my car.. and if his cars not running properly whay would he try to have a go wae a Cossie

Daimo B
Member

Registered: 20th Mar 00
User status: Offline
8th Dec 03 at 14:56   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

In that case the bloke with the LET is either a poofta behined the wheel or its seriously not running right and he doesn't know it.

PLease listen to everyone please!! An XE would not beat a LET.
An XE would need throttle bodies to bring it close to a LET, but even that would not be enough, maybe over a 1/4 it would bring it closer, but deffo not at top end!
MattyB
Member

Registered: 13th Nov 01
Location: 118.5bhp :D
User status: Offline
8th Dec 03 at 14:59   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by The Guru
quote:
Originally posted by MattyB
Daimo - he didnt race him in a 3.0 v6 corsa.....he race was:

c20xe corsa Vs c20let corsa

appararently the xe kept up


NO.. aparently I past him!


yeah, ok mate

miss_bravo
Member

Registered: 26th Jan 03
Location: Falkirk, Scotland
User status: Offline
8th Dec 03 at 15:01   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by The Guru
LMFAO at the Muff mobile!

Miss Bravo do you know who the guy in the 4x4 Cossie was? I need to have a chat. Muf knowns fine well whats in my car.. and if his cars not running properly whay would he try to have a go wae a Cossie




Nope I'm not sure who he is but I think he's up the town quite alot so I'm sure you'll see him around sometime.
Lucky B
Member

Registered: 7th Apr 02
Location: Lunatic asylum. Drives: Hard & Fast.
User status: Offline
8th Dec 03 at 15:06   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by Sooty
gotta be... XE's are quick... but they aint THAT quick

Yes they are!
Tom
Member

Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: Wirral, Merseyside
User status: Offline
8th Dec 03 at 15:12   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

yesh more constant toio
Steve
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
8th Dec 03 at 15:19   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

XE
Lucky B
Member

Registered: 7th Apr 02
Location: Lunatic asylum. Drives: Hard & Fast.
User status: Offline
8th Dec 03 at 15:22   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

The XE is infinately more reliable than the LET, just ask Roy...

He couldn't keep his LET Corsa in engines.

Unfortunately some dumb ass car salesman couldn't keep the car out of a dry stane dyke either

[Edited on 08-12-2003 by Lucky B]
Tom
Member

Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: Wirral, Merseyside
User status: Offline
8th Dec 03 at 15:23   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

xe with tb's well prefer

  <<  1    2    3  >>
New Topic

New Poll

Corsa Sport » Message Board » General Chat » Turbo's not so fast!! 22 database queries in 0.0250342 seconds