Marc
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: York
User status: Offline
|
101bhp @ 4000rpm
131lb/ft @ 4700rpm
Cant be right can it?! 
|
Paul_J
Member
Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
no it isn't, if it was your power would be 117 bhp I believe.
131 * 4700 RPM divided by 5252 = 117
|
Paul_J
Member
Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by 16vmarc
101bhp @ 4000rpm
131lb/ft @ 4700rpm
Cant be right can it?!
hang on is that a typo?
you got peak power at 4000rpm???
|
AK
Member
Registered: 5th Jul 00
Location: Aberdeen City
User status: Offline
|
no.... peak bhp isnt measured at peak torque......
on my GT peak torque is between 3500-4000.... but peak bhp (at the wheels) is around 6000
|
Paul_J
Member
Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Adam Kindness
no.... peak bhp isnt measured at peak torque......
on my GT peak torque is between 3500-4000.... but peak bhp (at the wheels) is around 6000
yes but thats because peak torque rpm is lower than peak bhp rpm...
look at his, peak torque rpm is at 4700, bhp is only at 4000 - therefore peak power would be at 4700
|
Paul_J
Member
Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
and ok, it may even be more at the peak power - coz it might drop a bit and level out - i.e. 129 at 5500 rpm
either way, at peak torque according to his figures his bhp would be 117 - which it isn't. so it proves something is fucked up.
|
AK
Member
Registered: 5th Jul 00
Location: Aberdeen City
User status: Offline
|
got you there..... the whole readout looks a shambles 
|
Marc
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: York
User status: Offline
|
I kno somethings amiss cos the scoobmeisters read out has sensible bhp and torque curves!
|
Dave Helium
Member
Registered: 28th Mar 02
Location: Aberdeen Drives: Mk4 ibiza fr and omega elite 3.2v
User status: Offline
|
Heres some pics from the day
|
vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
thats a shit load of loss
|
Paul_J
Member
Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
err 
67 bhp at the wheels? I think I got 61 bhp at the wheels in my relatively unmodded sxi
|
vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Paul_J
err
67 bhp at the wheels? I think I got 61 bhp at the wheels in my relatively unmodded sxi
different rollers. stars @ well readings are lower than most places I have seen
|
Dave Helium
Member
Registered: 28th Mar 02
Location: Aberdeen Drives: Mk4 ibiza fr and omega elite 3.2v
User status: Offline
|
this is it i dont know what was going on with my car that day was prob the fact it didnt even get 2 warm up before it went on! it will be going away 2 dastek as i said in the start of the year 2 try and sort out the problem! as u can c there wasnt alot of ground clearence with my car!
|
Lucky B
Member
Registered: 7th Apr 02
Location: Lunatic asylum. Drives: Hard & Fast.
User status: Offline
|
The high losses were down to the cars sitting for ages so the gearbox oil was cold/thick again.
The silver Saxo VTS was the first one on the rollers after arriving and so had some hot box oil and a decent @ wheels figure.
|
AK
Member
Registered: 5th Jul 00
Location: Aberdeen City
User status: Offline
|
clean as ever eh!!! 
Good pics laddie
|
vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Lucky B
The high losses were down to the cars sitting for ages so the gearbox oil was cold/thick again.
The silver Saxo VTS was the first one on the rollers after arriving and so had some hot box oil and a decent @ wheels figure.
sorry dave thats crap and you know it. I've had my car run on the rollers at star and I get high losses. it's just their rollers
|
Andy
Member
Registered: 28th Dec 99
Location: Cumbria, UK
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by 16vmarc
101bhp @ 4000rpm
131lb/ft @ 4700rpm
Cant be right can it?!
No, if 101bhp is supposed to be your peak power, it's not right. It's bull. Power = torque x revs. If peak torque is at 4700rpm then the power at 4700rpm will DEFINITELY be higher than at 4000rpm.
|
Lucky B
Member
Registered: 7th Apr 02
Location: Lunatic asylum. Drives: Hard & Fast.
User status: Offline
|
So what you saying vibs?
Star's rollers are crap?
|
Adam_B
Member
Registered: 13th Dec 00
Location: Lancashire
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by heliumhead
And my mate that bought the purple 2.0 that was for sale on this web site got 165bhp @ 5920rpm
149lbf-ft Torque @ 5150rpm! not 2 shabby
[Edited on 15-12-2003 by heliumhead]
What mods on it ?
|
lee mitchell
Member
Registered: 26th Jan 01
Location: kent...drive's: eveyones conversion cars hard lol
User status: Offline
|
its standard adam. that was the second one i done. just got a green air filter and zaust. to be honest it felt one of the slowest ones id ever driven
|
Adam_B
Member
Registered: 13th Dec 00
Location: Lancashire
User status: Offline
|
hmmm. Im off to see a man about an ecu today, try and sort my little fueling problem.
|
AK
Member
Registered: 5th Jul 00
Location: Aberdeen City
User status: Offline
|
Lee,
it got the same power, and more torque than mine....
Mine did get more at the wheels tho
|
lee mitchell
Member
Registered: 26th Jan 01
Location: kent...drive's: eveyones conversion cars hard lol
User status: Offline
|
L.M. styling like to squueze that little bit of extra torque out
|
AK
Member
Registered: 5th Jul 00
Location: Aberdeen City
User status: Offline
|
but id would have still had its ARSE ripped by the bucket V1
|
lee mitchell
Member
Registered: 26th Jan 01
Location: kent...drive's: eveyones conversion cars hard lol
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Adam Kindness
but id would have still had its ARSE ripped by the bucket V1
i get lost with all the cars u have so dont know which ones the v1 bucket 
|
