corsasport.co.uk
  Not logged in [Login - Register]  
You Are Not Registered Or Not Logged In  

Corsa Sport » Message Board » General Chat » EK9's


New Topic
New Poll 		  <<  1    2    3    4    5  >> Subscribe | Add to Favourites

You are not logged in and may not post or reply to messages. Please log in or create a new account or mail us about fixing an existing one - register@corsasport.co.uk

There are also many more features available when you are logged in such as private messages, buddy list, location services, post search and more.


Author EK9's
kiddy-sean
Banned
Registered: 27th Oct 05
Location: kidderminster "worcstershire" west midz
User status: Offline
29th Dec 06 at 16:17   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by antscorsa
hang on a xe corsa weighs considerbbly less and just hit 15s.

ek9s do the same with a heavier car and less bhp.

maybe its the driver a lot of people who have civics dont understand that the altho the ek9 can rev to 9k, changing at 8.2k is much better for the next gear.
plus there not strip cars there track cars.


less bhp? tit they is 185ps man
Novaneil
Member
Registered: 26th Oct 06
Location: Leamington Spa
User status: Offline
29th Dec 06 at 16:18   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
Lol,

Honda Vtec FWD's are always slighty quicker 0-60 than most of their rivals... reasons being... Diff as standard, High revving (so can easily reach 60 in 2nd gear) lack of torque (which means they don't spin the wheels up when launching) and finally the gearbox is on the left of the engine (looking from the front of the car) and when they launch the engine tilts forward (as opposed to rearwards like vauxhalls) digging over the front wheels (as opposed to trying to lift the wheels off the ground, transmitting weight rearwards like vauxhalls)

Cappish?
Welsh Dan
Member
Registered: 23rd Mar 00
User status: Offline
29th Dec 06 at 16:18   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
Its 5.7 for the EK9 N1, which is the even more stripped out version, and low 6 for the normal EK9. Don't forget, it only has the same amount of torque as most other 1.6s and so it isn't going to be amazing up the 1/4. A standard 265bhp RX7 can only just get 14.00. The XE Nova/Corsa will have more torque, as its a larger engine.

[Edited on 29-12-2006 by Welsh Dan]
Eck
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 17th Apr 06
Location: Lundin Links, Fife
User status: Offline
29th Dec 06 at 16:18   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
You got your figures from the net, which are incorrect and I bet you have NEVER driven one but just assume they are shit because your warped figures say they get to the 1/4 in 15 seconds which is a very quick time for a standard hatchback.
birchieboy
Member
Registered: 18th Jan 06
User status: Offline
29th Dec 06 at 16:18   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
with u know chaps!
1/4 times arnt just down to the car. theres alot of skill in it aswell
mayb thats y theere 1/4's are as you say,, slow
Welsh Dan
Member
Registered: 23rd Mar 00
User status: Offline
29th Dec 06 at 16:19   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
I've driven one.
Eck
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 17th Apr 06
Location: Lundin Links, Fife
User status: Offline
29th Dec 06 at 16:20   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
was not aimed at you Dan
Robin
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 7th Jan 04
Location: Northants Drives: Clio 182 Cup
User status: Offline
29th Dec 06 at 16:20   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
and you know how good they are then Dan.
kiddy-sean
Banned
Registered: 27th Oct 05
Location: kidderminster "worcstershire" west midz
User status: Offline
29th Dec 06 at 16:20   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Novaneil
Lol,

Honda Vtec FWD's are always slighty quicker 0-60 than most of their rivals... reasons being... Diff as standard, High revving (so can easily reach 60 in 2nd gear) lack of torque (which means they don't spin the wheels up when launching) and finally the gearbox is on the left of the engine (looking from the front of the car) and when they launch the engine tilts forward (as opposed to rearwards like vauxhalls) digging over the front wheels (as opposed to trying to lift the wheels off the ground, transmitting weight rearwards like vauxhalls)

Cappish?


man that shit is of da hook.

Any1 watch deal or no deal?
Eck
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 17th Apr 06
Location: Lundin Links, Fife
User status: Offline
29th Dec 06 at 16:21   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
This has got to be a piss take now.
Welsh Dan
Member
Registered: 23rd Mar 00
User status: Offline
29th Dec 06 at 16:21   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Robin
and you know how good they are then Dan.


They are rubbish

.
Thats with a chinned 4-1 manifold and a Spoon N1 backbox.
Marc
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: York
User status: Offline
29th Dec 06 at 16:22   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
Creamy
antscorsa
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: london
User status: Offline
29th Dec 06 at 16:22   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by kiddy-sean
quote:
Originally posted by antscorsa
hang on a xe corsa weighs considerbbly less and just hit 15s.

ek9s do the same with a heavier car and less bhp.

maybe its the driver a lot of people who have civics dont understand that the altho the ek9 can rev to 9k, changing at 8.2k is much better for the next gear.
plus there not strip cars there track cars.


less bhp? tit they is 185ps man


sorry i had let in my mind
Robin
Premium Member

Avatar

Registered: 7th Jan 04
Location: Northants Drives: Clio 182 Cup
User status: Offline
29th Dec 06 at 16:22   View Garage View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
121 lb/ft on a 1.6 16v?

that's rubbish

(same as a 1.6 corsa, which would do a 1/4 mile in what? 18 seconds?)
slash
Member
Registered: 30th Jul 06
Location: South Wales
User status: Offline
29th Dec 06 at 16:23   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
ek9???
kiddy-sean
Banned
Registered: 27th Oct 05
Location: kidderminster "worcstershire" west midz
User status: Offline
29th Dec 06 at 16:23   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
fort they wud av ova 200 £'s of talk wiv vtec
kiddy-sean
Banned
Registered: 27th Oct 05
Location: kidderminster "worcstershire" west midz
User status: Offline
29th Dec 06 at 16:23   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by slash
ek9???


yeh man
Marc
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: York
User status: Offline
29th Dec 06 at 16:23   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by kiddy-sean
fort they wud av ova 200 £'s of talk wiv vtec

Welsh Dan
Member
Registered: 23rd Mar 00
User status: Offline
29th Dec 06 at 16:24   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
Exactly Rob. Its no less torque than the majority of NA 1.6s as you've said, but compared to an most engines with equal power, it is far less torque.

But anyway. It has VTEC.

[Edited on 29-12-2006 by Welsh Dan]
Novaneil
Member
Registered: 26th Oct 06
Location: Leamington Spa
User status: Offline
29th Dec 06 at 16:24   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Robin
It would destroy an XE corsa round a track, which is what matters.


I've driven an EG Civic with that Engine in and im not so sure it would have a Corsa XE (with decent suspension) round a track... From experience standard Civic handling is shocking! They have loads of potential but in standard trim its not great.

Again, I haven't driven the EK9 so don't know how much different... better? the handling is???

Neil
kiddy-sean
Banned
Registered: 27th Oct 05
Location: kidderminster "worcstershire" west midz
User status: Offline
29th Dec 06 at 16:24   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Robin
121 lb/ft on a 1.6 16v?

that's rubbish

(same as a 1.6 corsa, which would do a 1/4 mile in what? 18 seconds?)


got 70bhp mor n vtec innit.
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
29th Dec 06 at 16:24   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
peak torque at 8357rpm PMSL
kiddy-sean
Banned
Registered: 27th Oct 05
Location: kidderminster "worcstershire" west midz
User status: Offline
29th Dec 06 at 16:25   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Cybermonkey
peak torque at 8357rpm PMSL


they dnt rev that much. they rev 6750rpm
Welsh Dan
Member
Registered: 23rd Mar 00
User status: Offline
29th Dec 06 at 16:25   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
The handling on it was easily one of the best i've driven, either FWD or RWD. Mine had Tanabe coilovers mind and slightly different size tyres compared to normal, so it wasn't completely standard.
Welsh Dan
Member
Registered: 23rd Mar 00
User status: Offline
29th Dec 06 at 16:26   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by kiddy-sean
quote:
Originally posted by Cybermonkey
peak torque at 8357rpm PMSL


they dnt rev that much. they rev 6750rpm


It revved to 9k

  <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
New Topic
New Poll

Corsa Sport » Message Board » General Chat » EK9's 22 database queries in 0.0167210 seconds