BigSte
Member
Registered: 27th Aug 02
Location: Sheffield
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Nath
quote:
Originally posted by BigSte
and fuck off whinging.
OMG.
OMG.
OMG.
POT KETTLE BLACK
Racist.
|
jr
Member
Registered: 20th May 02
Location: Kent
User status: Offline
|
fucking hell, someone gets it 
thats the point, the court thing has said without Tevez, west ham would have got relegated
how can the possibly say that, when its all ifs and buts ? impossible, so how can you pay Sheff ££££ when none of it is facts
|
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by BigSte
quote:
Originally posted by Nath
quote:
Originally posted by BigSte
and fuck off whinging.
OMG.
OMG.
OMG.
POT KETTLE BLACK
Racist.
Indeed. I prefer blue and white.
|
BigSte
Member
Registered: 27th Aug 02
Location: Sheffield
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by jr
read the points thing, i didnt work it out, but in the games without tevez, we got more points per game, than the ones where he played, which makes the arbitration total bollocks
I'm over this whole thing now....couldn't give 2 shits.
FA didn't want to be seen to go back on there decision which is probably why the 2nd arbitration ended with same answer......the 3rd one which was totally unattached to the PL in any way got the decision right.
Whole situation is fucked up, you were wrong - deal with it.
We will get paid compensation for the wrong doing - that's a fact no matter what your opinion is.
Anyway - got better things to worry about, like the long trip to Arsenal tonight to get a beating by their youth team!! COME ON YOU BLADES!!!
|
jr
Member
Registered: 20th May 02
Location: Kent
User status: Offline
|
ste, you have actully come across well there, im more angry at what your fellow supporters are saying on various fan forums etc
|
Marc
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: York
User status: Offline
|
Carlos Tevez FTW.
|
BigSte
Member
Registered: 27th Aug 02
Location: Sheffield
User status: Offline
|
 we friends now then?
Local radio makes me laugh, this morning it was 'Blades could receive up to £30m', by the time I got to work it was 'Blades will receive £30m'.....just now they said 'Blades stand to receive in excess of £30m'
By tonight we will have more money than City!
|
Marc
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: York
User status: Offline
|
OR maybe they were on about the same £30m. Meaning you have £30m 
|
Russ
Member
Registered: 14th Mar 04
Location: Armchair
User status: Offline
|
seriously though, whats £30mil to whu
|
Robbo
Member
Registered: 6th Aug 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
Whilst we are makign up stupid rules can we deduct the 3 points Sheff Utd got for beatign us due to a pitch that wasnt passable for sunday league and also for kickign lumps out of our players for 90 mins non-stop 
Woop!
On a more serious note, I am of the opinion that WHU 'cheated' in the way they registered Tevez/Masch but tbf as JR said that backfired on them by screwing up their season in the first place... due to the bungling FA, WHU didnt really break any rules therefore you cant really say they did that much wrong
And as for Tevez causing Sheff Utd to go down, well thats the biggest load of bollocks ever, if u were good enough to stay up, u wud have staye dup, suimple as
Ste, your trip will be worth it today cos ull at least get to experience the Emirates, tis an awesome stadium 
|
jr
Member
Registered: 20th May 02
Location: Kent
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Russ
seriously though, whats £30mil to whu
alot
|
jr
Member
Registered: 20th May 02
Location: Kent
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by BigSte
we friends now then?
Local radio makes me laugh, this morning it was 'Blades could receive up to £30m', by the time I got to work it was 'Blades will receive £30m'.....just now they said 'Blades stand to receive in excess of £30m'
By tonight we will have more money than City!
not by any means, you just havent come across like a cunt
the figure has and will not be sorted to later in the year, if that goes ahead, as there has to be a whole new arbitration on how much, if anything your owed
|
jr
Member
Registered: 20th May 02
Location: Kent
User status: Offline
|
on the new ruling, were going to sue the FA, as SWP broke dean ashtons ankle in training for england
if we had deano for the whole season, we would have score 14 more goals, and got 14 points more, therefore finishing 11th, so we are owed 11th spot prize £££
|
Robbo
Member
Registered: 6th Aug 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
This is why sport shoudl stay sport and not go outside 
|
MatthewR
Member
Registered: 21st Oct 02
Location: Rickmansworth
User status: Offline
|
Just sell Lucas Neill - his wages will pay the £30m
|
jr
Member
Registered: 20th May 02
Location: Kent
User status: Offline
|
|
Jodi_the_g
Member
Registered: 7th Aug 01
Location: Washington D.C
User status: Offline
|
How the court worded it is stupid.
If they had it as you played an illegal player and broke the rules that;s fair enough.
But to say he was the reason you got the points.
Am I correct in thinking as I can not remember, that you where awarded the fine mid season and no one complained about the punishment then.
|
strick206
Member
Registered: 12th Apr 07
Location: Wigan Drives:Integra DC5
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by jr
on the new ruling, were going to sue the FA, as SWP broke dean ashtons ankle in training for england
if we had deano for the whole season, we would have score 14 more goals, and got 14 points more, therefore finishing 11th, so we are owed 11th spot prize ���
A goal = a point, fucking hell
TBH, west ham must have knew this was happening, because they began offloading players and getting people off the wage bill, so they must have expected this
Either way, i don't give a shit, west ham cheated with tevez/masch, and sheff united didnt get enough points to stay up, and in all fairness, should have beat never mind got just a point against a poor wigan side
|
strick206
Member
Registered: 12th Apr 07
Location: Wigan Drives:Integra DC5
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Jodi_the_g
How the court worded it is stupid.
If they had it as you played an illegal player and broke the rules that;s fair enough.
But to say he was the reason you got the points.
Am I correct in thinking as I can not remember, that you where awarded the fine mid season and no one complained about the punishment then.
No, many people complained at just the fine, because points being deducted was what people expected to happen
|
strick206
Member
Registered: 12th Apr 07
Location: Wigan Drives:Integra DC5
User status: Offline
|
In all of this, it's down to the FA being shit
|
Jodi_the_g
Member
Registered: 7th Aug 01
Location: Washington D.C
User status: Offline
|
Yes I agree the FA as very weak.
John Terry's send off getting overruled is a prime example.
When Middlesbrough refused to turn up to a game did they get a fine or points off?
Although when all is said and done, the FA never banned the players from playing so why not pick them
|
Cavey
Member
Registered: 11th Nov 02
Location: Derby
User status: Offline
|
Don't relegated teams get parachute payment, so Sheff Utd, admittedly didn't get the amount of money that they would of done staying in the prem, but they still got 10-20mill didn't they?
Is the 30million making it up to the amount that they would of got staying in the league.
Nath said it best really, there's no way to judge how West Ham or any other team would or wouldn't have done with different personel playing.
It's another step to making the game a bit of a joke, don't like a decision, cry about it till something happens.
Watford should sue the linesman for saturdays performance
|
jr
Member
Registered: 20th May 02
Location: Kent
User status: Offline
|
points, but yes Jodi, the FA should have banned tevez, they didnt, they said he needed to be installed on a proper loan contract, which is what we did, hence him playing in the last 4 games
|
jr
Member
Registered: 20th May 02
Location: Kent
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Cavey
Don't relegated teams get parachute payment, so Sheff Utd, admittedly didn't get the amount of money that they would of done staying in the prem, but they still got 10-20mill didn't they?
Is the 30million making it up to the amount that they would of got staying in the league.
Nath said it best really, there's no way to judge how West Ham or any other team would or wouldn't have done with different personel playing.
It's another step to making the game a bit of a joke, don't like a decision, cry about it till something happens.
Watford should sue the linesman for saturdays performance
the 30m is from lost tv rights, and better still, because jagelka (sp) lost 4m of his transfer value because he had a religation clause
|
strick206
Member
Registered: 12th Apr 07
Location: Wigan Drives:Integra DC5
User status: Offline
|
The thing is Cavey, they are saying they lost players due to going down, and didn't get the true valuations for them because they had nothing to bargain with
Also, the loss of TV money would have been a massive blow
|
