Archie
Organiser: Scotland Premium Member
Registered: 18th Dec 07
Location: South Ayrshire
User status: Offline
|
Thought X16's were 109 ponys?
|
Eck
Premium Member
Registered: 17th Apr 06
Location: Lundin Links, Fife
User status: Offline
|
Other way about bud, the c16 is the more powerful.
|
Archie
Organiser: Scotland Premium Member
Registered: 18th Dec 07
Location: South Ayrshire
User status: Offline
|
Ah my bad, i always get them mixed up
|
corsadonk
Premium Member
Registered: 4th Jul 09
Location: Marlborough, Wiltshire
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Eck
quote: Originally posted by Archie
quote: Originally posted by Eck
quote: Originally posted by corsadonk
My X16XE had 108BHP when it was standard with over 100k on the clock. So I'm going for 111BHP
I wouldn't use an over reading rr as a benchmark. I'd say 103.
He doesnt say its over reading :s
A standard engine with high miles with more power than standard? He didn't need to. I chose to come to that conclusion alllllllll by myself.
They can't of been that far out because the C20XE's on the day all made less than 150, Z20LET was under power, the C20LET was lowish, and the Monaro was on the money
Mine hasn't got a service with it either
|
corsadonk
Premium Member
Registered: 4th Jul 09
Location: Marlborough, Wiltshire
User status: Offline
|
|
Pridzz
Member
Registered: 18th Nov 08
Location: Exmouth - Devon
User status: Offline
|
Dont like his rollers. I personally dont think they are that accurate. My clio done 178bhp wen i pt it on his, when last time it ran 187bhp the time before. My mates standard ph2 172 also got 178bhp to the same decimal point as mine and he went on before me. This was at SSS rollin road day
|
3i_gaz
Member
Registered: 29th Nov 07
Location: Liverpool
User status: Offline
|
sound that graph looks decent too
|
Linch
Member
Registered: 4th May 06
Location: Whickham, Tyne and Wear
User status: Offline
|
bad graph that!
|