A2H GO
Member
Registered: 14th Sep 04
Location: Stoke
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by AK
may as well move this to offday now.
|
adiohead
Member
Registered: 28th Sep 01
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by AK
<smacks adiohead against wall>
|
AK
Member
Registered: 5th Jul 00
Location: Aberdeen City
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by chris_uk
well i think you need to look at power to weight than just bhp.. jimmy lapped faster at snetterton than umar and he had 400bhp more.
Yes - because he (jimmy) will have gone round the corners MUCH quicker than the RX7...
that plots above have both cars taking the corners roughly at the same speed.... the lap time difference is mostly just grunt on the straights.
|
smcGSI16V
Member
Registered: 26th May 03
Location: Farnborough Drives: Thurlby 888 CDTi No.98
User status: Offline
|
If the impreza had comparable tyres to the skyline would it then be faster in the corners then have more speed on the straights and then be about the same lap time?
|
Nick-S
Member
Registered: 3rd Mar 04
Location: Leigh. Drives: RS Megane 230 F1 Team R26
User status: Offline
|
So in summary both cars handle well, But the faster car went round the track... faster?
|
Phillips_91
Member
Registered: 20th Jan 10
Location: Blackpool. Drives: Sapphire Black Mk4 Astra 1.8
User status: Offline
|
IMO (and i've never been on track so might talk a load of absolute shite) the power isn't giving fee that much more edge, so ok she gets up to speed quicker and she's doing a fair wack more speed at the end of the straights, but thats hindering her in th sence that she has to brake earlier, longer and harder
But like i say, i've only ever done straight line racing so i could be talking utter shit
|
John
Member
Registered: 30th Jun 03
User status: Offline
|
I'm no track expert but I think the quicker one will be faster.
|
AK
Member
Registered: 5th Jul 00
Location: Aberdeen City
User status: Offline
|
phillips_91 - dont worry, you're not the only one talking utter shite
smcGSI16V - If the impreza had 888's I'd think it could have maybe done 0.5 better. The GTR would have still taken about 1 second + on EVERY straight.
|
AK
Member
Registered: 5th Jul 00
Location: Aberdeen City
User status: Offline
|
4 impreza laps overlaid, my theoretical best was 58.21
My fastest lap - was actually the lap that I took McItyres and part of Duffis the slowest
Seems I lost it all on the braking into the bloody hairpin :S (was actually taking it in a different gear compared to normal!)
the flat red line on Delta-T is my quickest lap (so above X axis = slower, below = faster)
[Edited on 29-09-2011 by AK]
|
chris_uk
Premium Member
Registered: 8th Jul 03
User status: Offline
|
your question "how much is gained from more power" cant be really answered unless you use the same conditions but only change 1 variable.. power.
you havent mentioned torque yet which is an important factor, expecially on a teack like knockhill.
lets say that all the variables are the same and we could just change tge power it then depends on what track its used on, a track with long straights would probably see more of a gain, but remembering the faster you go the sooner you have to stop.
a car with more power wont just be faster on the straights either it will use it all over the track.
more power in a car id say would give you better laptimes but there will come a point of drivability. if you have 600bhp yet can only use 60% throttle then there is no longer much point in all that power. (i know of an elise which had the same issue with too much power he could no longer drive the car as well as he could so they lowered the power)
|
AK
Member
Registered: 5th Jul 00
Location: Aberdeen City
User status: Offline
|
you're really not getting what I'm suggesting....
look at the traces.... we took the corners at roughly the same speed - so ignore them.
Look at the Delta-T for the straights.....
Fee is simply pulling out 1+ seconds a bloody straight.
That is all.
I'm not comparing tyres, suspension, drivers, torque, weight, weather conditions, breast size etc etc
The GTR is simple fucking off down the straights opening up the gap. IF... IF... IF I had comparable power my Impreza SHOULD be able to do a similar lap time.
Simple stuff
[Edited on 29-09-2011 by AK]
|
John
Member
Registered: 30th Jun 03
User status: Offline
|
So point of the thread is, 2 comparable cars, all being equal, will go round a track at the same speed?
|
sand-eel
Member
Registered: 15th Mar 07
Location: carluke/braidwood--IRNBRULAND
User status: Offline
|
These times are with different drivers are they not?
|
AK
Member
Registered: 5th Jul 00
Location: Aberdeen City
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by John
So point of the thread is, 2 comparable cars, all being equal, will go round a track at the same speed?
no....
the point was to show that a lap time differnence of 4.5 secs is possible with more fucking power.
|
0775kieran
Member
Registered: 28th Apr 10
Location: Bolton, Greater Manchester
User status: Offline
|
Clever stuff
|
AK
Member
Registered: 5th Jul 00
Location: Aberdeen City
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by sand-eel
These times are with different drivers are they not?
different drivers
different cars
different days
different years
different power
same day of the week, and same month....
I'm not making any direct comparisions other than having a fuck load more power seems to give you an X second advantage on Y straight.
|
sand-eel
Member
Registered: 15th Mar 07
Location: carluke/braidwood--IRNBRULAND
User status: Offline
|
Not very accurate time difference if you are the better driver, if you drove both cars maybe the difference could be 5 seconds instead of 4.
Still with an extra 200bhp no surprises tbh.
|
John
Member
Registered: 30th Jun 03
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by AK
quote: Originally posted by John
So point of the thread is, 2 comparable cars, all being equal, will go round a track at the same speed?
no....
the point was to show that a lap time differnence of 4.5 secs is possible with more fucking power.
Although there are other variables here that your graphs don't take 100% account of, they are both the same thing.
|
adiohead
Member
Registered: 28th Sep 01
User status: Offline
|
I would still like an R32 GTR, even though they are slow
|
3CorsaMeal
Member
Registered: 11th Apr 02
User status: Offline
|
i'd rather take 4.5seconds longer and not need to find the extra 270bhp needed to do it.
on a road car that is
|
AK
Member
Registered: 5th Jul 00
Location: Aberdeen City
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by adiohead
I would still like an R32 GTR, even though they are slow
very good.
dont think i've ever desired to own to a Seat Leon
|
AK
Member
Registered: 5th Jul 00
Location: Aberdeen City
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by John
Although there are other variables here that your graphs don't take 100% account of, they are both the same thing.
care to elaborate?
|
chrisritch
Member
Registered: 2nd Sep 08
Location: Northants Drives: V40
User status: Offline
|
so its a pointless thread of you telling us a more powerful car is faster on the straights?
|
AK
Member
Registered: 5th Jul 00
Location: Aberdeen City
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by sand-eel
Not very accurate time difference if you are the better driver, if you drove both cars maybe the difference could be 5 seconds instead of 4.
Still with an extra 200bhp no surprises tbh.
i'm not saying i'm a better driver.....
i'm not claiming that this is a 100% accurate comparison.....
|
Chris x
Member
Registered: 11th Sep 08
Location: Bexhill
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by AK
quote: Originally posted by adiohead
I would still like an R32 GTR, even though they are slow
very good.
dont think i've ever desired to own to a Seat Leon
Thats fucking harsh m8
|