Nic Barnes
Member
Registered: 5th Apr 04
Location: nowhere near ginger people
User status: Offline
|
Well done city, they won n without cheating
|
Marc
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: York
User status: Offline
|
Lesser of two evils won.
|
chrisritch
Member
Registered: 2nd Sep 08
Location: Northants Drives: V40
User status: Offline
|
only cost them in excess of a billion pounds too...
|
Steve
Premium Member
Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
|
Also a myth that Liverpool haven't spent anything.
|
IvIarkgraham
Premium Member
Registered: 27th Mar 04
Location: Ellesmere Port, Cheshire
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by chrisritch
only cost them in excess of a billion pounds too...
this argument is amazing.
so what if they spent loads? they have loads to spend and now they have something to show for it.
what have liverpool got for their hundreds of millions spent?
|
Marc
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: York
User status: Offline
|
24 years without a title is what they have got.
|
IvIarkgraham
Premium Member
Registered: 27th Mar 04
Location: Ellesmere Port, Cheshire
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Marc
24 years without a title is what they have got.
well worth it
|
Ben G
Member
Registered: 12th Jan 07
Location: Essex
User status: Offline
|
Hand clap for Liverpool coming second and winning nothing.
|
Russ
Member
Registered: 14th Mar 04
Location: Armchair
User status: Offline
|
Been a great season for liverpool, they have played some fantastic football this year. By finishing second after having it all in their own hands they are going to have a bitter taste in their mouths, but Arsenal had it in their hands too, and fucked it up, and so did Chelsea, Champions League football is deserved. Hopefully Brendan can get the players he wants and hold onto Saurez (it's gonna take more than £60m) they will be challenging for PL or the CL next year, not both as at the moment they dont have the squad
|
Ben J
Member
Registered: 31st Jan 05
Location: Cheshire
User status: Offline
|
Not playing in Europe was a HUGE advantage to Liverpool this season.
|
Russ
Member
Registered: 14th Mar 04
Location: Armchair
User status: Offline
|
definitely, and early ending cup runs.
|
Nic Barnes
Member
Registered: 5th Apr 04
Location: nowhere near ginger people
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by chrisritch
only cost them in excess of a billion pounds too...
bitterness is embarrassing.
|
MoesTavern
Member
Registered: 19th Jul 07
User status: Offline
|
I'm glad City won it to be honest.
Far too much wanking over Rodgers and Gerrard by the press these last few weeks
|
Marc
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: York
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Ben J
Not playing in Europe was a HUGE advantage to Liverpool this season.
Wonder if that will help us next season
|
Ben G
Member
Registered: 12th Jan 07
Location: Essex
User status: Offline
|
Liverpool didn't have a lazy fat cunt/injury prone rapist playing up front for them.
|
mwg
Member
Registered: 19th Feb 04
Location: South Lakes
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Marc
Lesser of two evils won.
|
Ben G
Member
Registered: 12th Jan 07
Location: Essex
User status: Offline
|
|
Eck
Premium Member
Registered: 17th Apr 06
Location: Lundin Links, Fife
User status: Offline
|
The whole CL games disadvantage story is utter horseshit. These are athletes conditioned to the highest level. The only time it'll prove costly is playing away to places like Russia then back for a game in two days.
It didn't affect City, it didn't affect Chelsea. Then again they have strength in depth and they don't have Sunday league backroom staff like Arsenal seem to have.
If Rodgers strengthens in key areas, I think they'll continue to challenge.
|
Robbo
Member
Registered: 6th Aug 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Marc
Lesser of two evils won.
think that's the general Utd consensus... would you have preferred Chelsea though?
|
Marc
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: York
User status: Offline
|
Obviously.
|
Robbo
Member
Registered: 6th Aug 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
but Chelsea are scum managed by the biggest penis on the planet :\
I do pity utd fans, must like being asked to choose between spurs and Chelsea winning the PL
|
Cavey
Member
Registered: 11th Nov 02
Location: Derby
User status: Offline
|
Maybe a bit presumptuous...
[Edited on 14-05-2014 by Cavey]
|
Ben J
Member
Registered: 31st Jan 05
Location: Cheshire
User status: Offline
|
Saw that on Twitter. Scares the living shit out of me. Karma and all that. But the local council have to take the risk.
Not cool though.
|
Ben J
Member
Registered: 31st Jan 05
Location: Cheshire
User status: Offline
|
If we win I'll be doing my own naked parade round my house btw. Might have to get signs up.
|
Rob_Quads
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: southampton
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Eck
It didn't affect City, it didn't affect Chelsea. Then again they have strength in depth and they don't have Sunday league backroom staff like Arsenal seem to have.
If Rodgers strengthens in key areas, I think they'll continue to challenge.
Exactly - it didn't affect City because they could field a whole 2nd 11 and still do well. Arsenal can't do that. Once we loose the top people we are in trouble.
Lets say Liverpool lost Gerrard, Suarez, Stirling you think they would still be performing to the same levels?
The reason City won the league was squad - Augruro gets injured and Djeko steps up them keeps banging them in.
|