Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
Epic mis quoting Nath.
Edit - I saw.
[Edited on 11-09-2009 by Cosmo]
|
BabyBlade
Member
Registered: 5th Feb 03
Location: Hereford Rides: Ninja 600
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by DannyB
Maybe not, but it could as they are randomly picked. The machine doesn't pick a ball then purposly pick one a lot greater than it, quite a lot of balls come out in sucession it just hasnt happened with all of them yet.
I have not said the machines pick them out depending on what they are 
ok ok you guys are right, go and put your 1,2,3,4,5,6
GOOD LUCK 
|
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Cosmo
Epic mis quoting Nath.
Edit - I saw.
[Edited on 11-09-2009 by Cosmo]
Moi?
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by BabyBlade
quote:
Originally posted by DannyB
Maybe not, but it could as they are randomly picked. The machine doesn't pick a ball then purposly pick one a lot greater than it, quite a lot of balls come out in sucession it just hasnt happened with all of them yet.
I have not said the machines pick them out depending on what they are
ok ok you guys are right, go and put your 1,2,3,4,5,6
GOOD LUCK
123456 is actually the most common set of numbers picked, and the odds of it coming out are 14m/1 as the rest of the combinations in the world.
|
AndyKent
Member
Registered: 3rd Sep 05
User status: Offline
|
quote:
And even if they never looked at those numbers, are you suggesting that the way to win the lottery is to get 24 people together, they pick 6 numbers, and then the average of those numbers is what comes up?
If you are, then Im up for being one of 24 to enter next weeks Euromillions, will come out at about 3.5m each WHEN we win.
I'm not suggesting he's telling the truth, I'm saying that short of trying exactly what he said (ie. getting a group of people to each predict a number without any sort of bias) you can't truly say he's wrong. Unless of course you know the complete ins and outs of psychology too.
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
Babydumbass, reply to my probability reply a minute ago and explain that away....
|
DannyB
Premium Member
Registered: 6th Feb 08
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by BabyBlade
ok ok you guys are right, go and put your 1,2,3,4,5,6
We have as much chance as winning with that as you would with 22.18.32.6.4.11
|
BabyBlade
Member
Registered: 5th Feb 03
Location: Hereford Rides: Ninja 600
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Cosmo
quote:
Originally posted by BabyBlade
are you joking?
Your dumber than you look..
OK lets put a bet on, I bet a draw will come out with 6 numbers that arent directly next to each other BEFORE a draw comes out with 6 numbers all directly next to each other..
infact i'll race to five, and i'd win all five...
Dont talk shit, the things are totally different.
Answer me this dumbshit...
number 6 comes out as the first number, am I correct or not saying that was a 1 in 49 chance?
number 7 comes out as the second number, am I correct or not saying that was a 1 in 48 chance?
number 8 comes out as the third number, am I correct or not saying this was a 1 in 47 chance?
etc.
Like I've said from the beginning..
I SEE WHERE YOUR COMING FROM....
maths or not, it's never happened as far as i am aware in the history of the lotto..
A wise man would prefer to select numbers which werent all consequetively linked, maths or no maths..
|
BabyBlade
Member
Registered: 5th Feb 03
Location: Hereford Rides: Ninja 600
User status: Offline
|
results from wed draw:
02 11 23 28 35 39 15
NO CONSECUTIVE NUMBERS
now please show me the last time 6 consecutive numbers came out
|
JM Curdy
Member
Registered: 20th Jan 05
Location: Stranraer, Scotland
User status: Offline
|
FPMSL babyblade
|
Baskey
Member
Registered: 31st May 06
User status: Offline
|
Saw how long this thread was so wacked on c4+1 to see what the fuss was about. Cant belive people have been talking about that utter tripe for 24 pages. Was he actuly serious ?
|
AndyKent
Member
Registered: 3rd Sep 05
User status: Offline
|
Its just convention that says you wouldn't pick 6 consecutive numbers, nothing wise about it.
|
DannyB
Premium Member
Registered: 6th Feb 08
User status: Offline
|
It hasn't, but that doesn't mean it can't and the chances of it happening are the same as them same numbers above coming out for the next 32 weeks.
|
micra_pete
Premium Member
Registered: 23rd Apr 03
Location: West Yorkshire
User status: Offline
|
23rd of Jan 2008
24, 25, 26, 38, 39, 40
Basic maths, the odds of consecutive numbers is the same as an other on a random draw?
|
luciaadr
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 04
Location: Bexleyheath, Greater London
User status: Offline
|
Tell you what Babyblade, find us a website that actually states its less likely. Just one. Any one.
There probably is such a site somewhere but hopefully you'll realise its only you belives it before you do!
|
BabyBlade
Member
Registered: 5th Feb 03
Location: Hereford Rides: Ninja 600
User status: Offline
|
yes i saw that Pete but thats 2 sets of consecutive numbers and its happened once
Cosmo has already said there is no such thing as luck..
and so since my theory happened wednesday, and you guys theory's has never happened, regardless of the odds..
I'm still going to laugh at anyone who has 6 con.. numbers....
|
Carl
Member
Registered: 9th May 04
Location: Jimmy Bennett's la la land.
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by BabyBlade
results from wed draw:
02 11 23 28 35 39 15
NO CONSECUTIVE NUMBERS
now please show me the last time 6 consecutive numbers came out
Don't pick consecutive, don't pick ones that have already won before, next you will be saying get 24 people in a room, make them write numbers down and divide it and you are onto a winner. 
|
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
|
FFS Babyblade you're the only one agreeing with your theory here
|
BabyBlade
Member
Registered: 5th Feb 03
Location: Hereford Rides: Ninja 600
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by luciaadr
Tell you what Babyblade, find us a website that actually states its less likely. Just one. Any one.
There probably is such a site somewhere but hopefully you'll realise its only you belives it before you do!
I'll show you a website that tells you the odds are the same... but then I have already said i get the odds..
Just goes to show how likely anyone is of actually winning, although if someones going to win it, why not me ?
|
Danny P
Member
Registered: 20th Nov 02
Location: Cleckheaton, West Yorkshire
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by BabyBlade
quote:
Originally posted by DannyB
Maybe not, but it could as they are randomly picked. The machine doesn't pick a ball then purposly pick one a lot greater than it, quite a lot of balls come out in sucession it just hasnt happened with all of them yet.
I have not said the machines pick them out depending on what they are
ok ok you guys are right, go and put your 1,2,3,4,5,6
GOOD LUCK
You go put on 4, 7, 19, 35, 46, 49.
I'll bet we have the same chance as winning as you do
|
Danny P
Member
Registered: 20th Nov 02
Location: Cleckheaton, West Yorkshire
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Nath
FFS Babyblade you're the only one agreeing with your theory here
I get what Babyblade is on about, I just dont think he/she is putting it across in the correct way.
|
BabyBlade
Member
Registered: 5th Feb 03
Location: Hereford Rides: Ninja 600
User status: Offline
|
makes you wonder why in poker, you are rewarded a straight ?
why not 2,4,6,8,10 ?
|
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Danny P
quote:
Originally posted by Nath
FFS Babyblade you're the only one agreeing with your theory here
I get what Babyblade is on about, I just dont think he/she is putting it across in the correct way.
Indeed.
|
Calum
Member
Registered: 2nd Sep 06
Location: Edinburgh, City of Edinburgh
User status: Offline
|
ur less likely to get 2,4,6,8,10 than a straight
|
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by BabyBlade
makes you wonder why in poker, you are rewarded a straight ?
why not 2,4,6,8,10 ?
How is that related to 49 random numbers?
In poker its rewarded because of what everyone else in the game might have. If there are 4 of you in the game then the chances of you having those cards are less likely. It's nothing like the Lotto.
|
