Sooty
Banned
Registered: 9th Mar 03
Location: FLAP CENTRAL
User status: Offline
|
I will get my graph on here tomorrow, so you can have a look... 124bhp GTi's dont easily pass VTS's
|
Colin
Member
Registered: 4th Apr 02
User status: Offline
|
Here's mine for all to see
|
Lucky B
Member
Registered: 7th Apr 02
Location: Lunatic asylum. Drives: Hard & Fast.
User status: Offline
|
129 bhp + 25% = 161.3bhp
Its the wheels figure thats important Kerry, a "fly" figure is only theoretical on a RR as i said.
You'd need to put an engine on a dyno for a proper "fly" figure.
|
Kerry
Member
Registered: 5th Oct 01
Location: Norwich
User status: Offline
|
but 161 far less than the standard figure
|
Lucky B
Member
Registered: 7th Apr 02
Location: Lunatic asylum. Drives: Hard & Fast.
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Sooty
I will get my graph on here tomorrow, so you can have a look... 124bhp GTi's dont easily pass VTS's
I'm not disputing what your graph says or your @wheels figure Sooty, just your flywheel figure.
A 106 gti normally makes about 105bhp @ wheels with a filter/manifold/decat exhaust, you stillhave a cast manifold so what you have is spot on @ wheels for your mods.
|
Kerry
Member
Registered: 5th Oct 01
Location: Norwich
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Colin J
Here's mine for all to see
Here's mine
|
Sooty
Banned
Registered: 9th Mar 03
Location: FLAP CENTRAL
User status: Offline
|
I also suspect this, tbh I was not too much concerned with the wheels fig... surely from what the other cars ran today, I believe this could be mis-calculated, I cant really fault any of the other cars fly fig's
|
Lucky B
Member
Registered: 7th Apr 02
Location: Lunatic asylum. Drives: Hard & Fast.
User status: Offline
|
kerry, do you go on any vectra/vauxhall sites?
If so ask around to see what other 2.5 owners get @ wheels with similar mods to you.
|
Sooty
Banned
Registered: 9th Mar 03
Location: FLAP CENTRAL
User status: Offline
|
good point, just what I was about to say... given the fly figures for all the cars and the wheel figures for all the cars, its more correct to say that the fly figures seem to be the ones at fault here
|
Colin
Member
Registered: 4th Apr 02
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Sooty
I also suspect this, tbh I was not too much concerned with the wheels fig... surely from what the other cars ran today, I believe this could be mis-calculated, I cant really fault any of the other cars fly fig's
Its the wheel one thats the true reading - comes off the rollers, the fly is only calculated onto the graph.
Wheel + torque if the ones that matter
|
Kerry
Member
Registered: 5th Oct 01
Location: Norwich
User status: Offline
|
but if the @ wheels figure is wrong wouldnt it then calculate the flywheel figure wrong?
|
Sooty
Banned
Registered: 9th Mar 03
Location: FLAP CENTRAL
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Colin J
quote: Originally posted by Sooty
I also suspect this, tbh I was not too much concerned with the wheels fig... surely from what the other cars ran today, I believe this could be mis-calculated, I cant really fault any of the other cars fly fig's
Its the wheel one thats the true reading - comes off the rollers, the fly is only calculated onto the graph.
Wheel + torque if the ones that matter
in that case everyone would of been running less than standard power with modifications on top
this is too much for a saturday night
|
Kerry
Member
Registered: 5th Oct 01
Location: Norwich
User status: Offline
|
now im fuckin confused
il go and see wot they say on vvoc but to be honest the majority of v6's are gsi so i cant compare
|
Lucky B
Member
Registered: 7th Apr 02
Location: Lunatic asylum. Drives: Hard & Fast.
User status: Offline
|
The @ wheels figure sounds ok with Sooty's car so i guess its ok with everyone Kerry, just check with other 2.5 owners and compare notes on @wheels figs and RR's.
All RR read differently but its the wheels fig thats important on a RR.
|
Lucky B
Member
Registered: 7th Apr 02
Location: Lunatic asylum. Drives: Hard & Fast.
User status: Offline
|
Lets all just drunk and forget it
|
Sooty
Banned
Registered: 9th Mar 03
Location: FLAP CENTRAL
User status: Offline
|
what does the drag output imply? which for me was 39.0 exactly the diff in wheels & fly
|
Colin
Member
Registered: 4th Apr 02
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Sooty
quote: Originally posted by Colin J
quote: Originally posted by Sooty
I also suspect this, tbh I was not too much concerned with the wheels fig... surely from what the other cars ran today, I believe this could be mis-calculated, I cant really fault any of the other cars fly fig's
Its the wheel one thats the true reading - comes off the rollers, the fly is only calculated onto the graph.
Wheel + torque if the ones that matter
in that case everyone would of been running less than standard power with modifications on top
this is too much for a saturday night
Ok, my car has 170BHP as standard
135BHP at the wheels
The 135 is the useble power, therefore the one that is important.
For the true fly reading the engine would have to be conected somehow to the RR - thus it is done in a rough calculation
|
Colin
Member
Registered: 4th Apr 02
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Lucky B
Lets all just drunk and forget it
Im going to bed
|
Sooty
Banned
Registered: 9th Mar 03
Location: FLAP CENTRAL
User status: Offline
|
What equation is this calculated with?
|
Kerry
Member
Registered: 5th Oct 01
Location: Norwich
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Sooty
what does the drag output imply? which for me was 39.0 exactly the diff in wheels & fly
mine was 50.5 he told me it was to do with calculatin or something
|
Colin
Member
Registered: 4th Apr 02
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Sooty
what does the drag output imply? which for me was 39.0 exactly the diff in wheels & fly
Its the loss in transfering the power from the engine thru transmition to the wheels
|
Lucky B
Member
Registered: 7th Apr 02
Location: Lunatic asylum. Drives: Hard & Fast.
User status: Offline
|
Thats the loses figure 39%, did he let the car slow right down in 4th or 5th gear after a power run?
Or maybe its a figure already inputted by him for trans losses...
|
Colin
Member
Registered: 4th Apr 02
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Sooty
What equation is this calculated with?
Dunno, its done automatically on the RR software
|
Sooty
Banned
Registered: 9th Mar 03
Location: FLAP CENTRAL
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Lucky B
Thats the loses figure 39%, did he let the car slow right down in 4th or 5th gear after a power run?
yes
|
Lucky B
Member
Registered: 7th Apr 02
Location: Lunatic asylum. Drives: Hard & Fast.
User status: Offline
|
Right down to idle almost?
Well if so that should be your losses, 39% your box must be fcuked if you've that much losses.
Some folk reckon only 10% for a 106 box!(not me)
|