Gareth F
Member
Registered: 16th Jan 08
Location: Location Location
User status: Offline
|
What software are you using?
Ive tried a few free ones but they are obviously not great.
|
Steve
Premium Member
Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
|
photoshop and/or photomatix
the software only really aids in merging stuf ftogether theres still quite a bit of work to get them looking decent
|
Gareth F
Member
Registered: 16th Jan 08
Location: Location Location
User status: Offline
|
Yeah i was playing about with photomatix but cant get anything decent as i only had a three shot one to work with. Down side is i think it was way to dark to get anything usable in the software. What kind of lighting conditions would be a good start?
|
John
Member
Registered: 30th Jun 03
User status: Offline
|
If it's really dark you take longer exposures, it works exactly the same way you would take a normal picture except you take an exposure a couple of stops either side of your normal exposure.
|
Gareth F
Member
Registered: 16th Jan 08
Location: Location Location
User status: Offline
|
hmm, if i post up the three exposures i randomly took. They are crap as i dont have a tripod and theres not much going on as i had low bat on the cam! But if any one can see if they can make it into a half decent HDR image id know its possible and im not just shit
|
Steve
Premium Member
Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
|
yeah some of them exposures of that bridge were 50 seconds pain in the arse waiting for that when its -5
|
Gareth F
Member
Registered: 16th Jan 08
Location: Location Location
User status: Offline
|
Steve my fingers were so numb i didnt know if i had pressed the button down enough
Tripod for crimbo and a wireless remote as soon as i can get one cheap enough (proper canon one not chinky crap) as i cant hold the cam still to save my life!
|
Steve
Premium Member
Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
|
tripod is a must, i dont bother with remote, just set the timer for 2 secs
[Edited on 26-11-2010 by Steve]
|
Gareth F
Member
Registered: 16th Jan 08
Location: Location Location
User status: Offline
|
Ok heres the three images, think ive got them right.
overx
middlex
underx
See if you can do anythign with these
|
Gareth F
Member
Registered: 16th Jan 08
Location: Location Location
User status: Offline
|
The remote is mainly for photos of me and the gf as we dont have many and i hate the whole shot from the end of my arm look
Think photos will look more natural using one.
I swear my arm shakes more when i need to be still
|
Steve
Premium Member
Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
|
they are ok the under is from a different spot though did you move the cam?
also you need to focus it as its blurry
|
Gareth F
Member
Registered: 16th Jan 08
Location: Location Location
User status: Offline
|
I tried not to
Ive worked out how to do it in a burst style shot so it will be easier to do.
And yeah it is blurry, only had the cam a few days. Will take a few more tonight but in a better lit location as it was pretty much ppitch black with minimal lighting.
|
Steve
Premium Member
Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
|
yeah shouldnt matter most of those i took were with next to no lighting, the hdr makes it look not so though.
what you took there would be fine if they were sharper and didnt move the cam
|
Gareth F
Member
Registered: 16th Jan 08
Location: Location Location
User status: Offline
|
I had it rested on the floor tilted up with a credit card
Need to carry a box around with me untill i get the tripod!
|
Gareth F
Member
Registered: 16th Jan 08
Location: Location Location
User status: Offline
|
Oh and one of them i cropped, uploaded from the wrong file
|
Steve
Premium Member
Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
|
[Edited on 28-11-2010 by Steve]
|
Steve
Premium Member
Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
|
|
Steve
Premium Member
Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
|
[Edited on 29-11-2010 by Steve]
|
John
Member
Registered: 30th Jun 03
User status: Offline
|
That photomatix isn't easy is it.
Photomatix
Photoshop
|
Steve
Premium Member
Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
|
easiest way to use photomatix is to load the brakcetted photos then goto exposure and set it to auto, then save it and tweak it in photoshop, thats what i do generally.
i like the last pic there
|
John
Member
Registered: 30th Jun 03
User status: Offline
|
I thought the photoshop one was quite good.
If I could take that without the window and droplets of water spoiling it it would be better.
[Edited on 29-11-2010 by John]
|
Steve
Premium Member
Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
|
yeah now you can see that it really brings out the lighting in the pic it looks like its just well lit, when actually its not
|
John
Member
Registered: 30th Jun 03
User status: Offline
|
Photoshop one is a photoshop hdr btw in case there was any confusion.
|
Steve
Premium Member
Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
|
yes i think photoshop hdr is good for creating more natural looking images, but photomatix is good for dramatic effects.
try photomatix with exposure auto though that works well
|
Gareth F
Member
Registered: 16th Jan 08
Location: Location Location
User status: Offline
|
When using photomatix is there a way (without photoshop) to save/use the final image? As when ever i save it i cant use it as its saved as an .xmp file which cannot be converted to jpeg
|