PaulW
Member
Registered: 26th Jan 03
Location: Atherton, Greater Manchester
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Teddy
quote: Originally posted by PaulW
quote: Originally posted by Skinz
quote: Originally posted by broster
quote: Originally posted by Skinz
BHP readouts count for jack, 80% of Rolling roads are overcalibrated anyway to give the customer satisfaction, and those that are calibrated correctly can overread by up to 10bhp for conditions etc not to mention transmission loss which is just a guess
agreed with that, i have been to a rolling road day where standard zetec s fiestas were pulling 120-125bhp! they then go on a different rolling road and get 100-110 bhp and say the lower reading is inacurate. my car is rr'd at 138bhp but has seen off corsas with more power more than once.
Proof is in the pudding
I'm still curious to get mine on a proper dyno, not a rolling road, but still 2 seperate rolling roads at 2 completely different places...
117.7bhp
117.4bhp
amazing how close both are if they are reading wrong...
Out of interest what was your torque figure?
not a great deal... 110 & 111 lb/ft...
broster - I'd be interested in RR'ing my GSi again against yours too
|
Ojc
Member
Registered: 14th Nov 00
Location: Reading: Drives : Clio 197
User status: Offline
|
Tell Steve he is a fcuking homo.
|
Skinz
Member
Registered: 15th May 03
User status: Offline
|
he says.."he knows" kiss
|
Paul_J
Member
Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by PaulW
not a great deal... 110 & 111 lb/ft...
broster - I'd be interested in RR'ing my GSi again against yours too
Even the 106 gti's with like 150 bhp only have about 123 lb ft of torque.
Just the downside of having a small engine capacity... lack of torque.
|
vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Teddy
.......suggests that the Vauxhall Corsa GSi 16v is not as "fast" as the Citroen Saxo VTS or the Peugeot 106GTi................
I have since found this information to be incorrect.
(even though i only have seats and a dash )
Bulltin Over.
[Edited on 16-05-2005 by Teddy]
so the 8s more the corsa takes to get to 100mph is actually a myth.
|
broster
Premium Member
Registered: 6th Dec 02
Location: Drives: E39
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by PaulW
quote: Originally posted by Teddy
quote: Originally posted by PaulW
quote: Originally posted by Skinz
quote: Originally posted by broster
quote: Originally posted by Skinz
BHP readouts count for jack, 80% of Rolling roads are overcalibrated anyway to give the customer satisfaction, and those that are calibrated correctly can overread by up to 10bhp for conditions etc not to mention transmission loss which is just a guess
agreed with that, i have been to a rolling road day where standard zetec s fiestas were pulling 120-125bhp! they then go on a different rolling road and get 100-110 bhp and say the lower reading is inacurate. my car is rr'd at 138bhp but has seen off corsas with more power more than once.
Proof is in the pudding
I'm still curious to get mine on a proper dyno, not a rolling road, but still 2 seperate rolling roads at 2 completely different places...
117.7bhp
117.4bhp
amazing how close both are if they are reading wrong...
Out of interest what was your torque figure?
not a great deal... 110 & 111 lb/ft...
broster - I'd be interested in RR'ing my GSi again against yours too
easily get that sorted dude
|
Skinz
Member
Registered: 15th May 03
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by vibrio
quote: Originally posted by Teddy
.......suggests that the Vauxhall Corsa GSi 16v is not as "fast" as the Citroen Saxo VTS or the Peugeot 106GTi................
I have since found this information to be incorrect.
(even though i only have seats and a dash )
Bulltin Over.
[Edited on 16-05-2005 by Teddy]
so the 8s more the corsa takes to get to 100mph is actually a myth.
Steve say..
apparently removing the seats and some interior of the corsa knocks 8s from the 0-100 time
|
broster
Premium Member
Registered: 6th Dec 02
Location: Drives: E39
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Skinz
quote: Originally posted by vibrio
quote: Originally posted by Teddy
.......suggests that the Vauxhall Corsa GSi 16v is not as "fast" as the Citroen Saxo VTS or the Peugeot 106GTi................
I have since found this information to be incorrect.
(even though i only have seats and a dash )
Bulltin Over.
[Edited on 16-05-2005 by Teddy]
so the 8s more the corsa takes to get to 100mph is actually a myth.
Steve say..
apparently removing the seats and some interior of the corsa knocks 8s from the 0-100 time
in teddys defence he has removed more than some of the interior!
|
RCS
Member
Registered: 26th Jan 05
Location: Lichfield/Dundee
User status: Offline
|
Haven't read all the debating but a standard VTS will still be quicker than a stripped GSi.
But, a stripped GSi may be DRIVEN faster than a standard VTS. When comparing cars of similar power, its all down to the driver and whoever gets the power down first. If the GSi gets it down first, the VTS will always be chasing it.
I was playing with a Xsara VTS last week on serious twisties, was all over the back of him and near enough passing him in my 1.4 16v, so it just goes to show the car is as quick as it can be driven.
|
Skinz
Member
Registered: 15th May 03
User status: Offline
|
^^ this man talks sense
|
Ojc
Member
Registered: 14th Nov 00
Location: Reading: Drives : Clio 197
User status: Offline
|
Paul small engine size does not mean lack of torque
1.4 8v 156 lb/ft
|
Skinz
Member
Registered: 15th May 03
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Ojc
Paul small engine size does not mean lack of torque
1.4 8v 156 lb/ft
no 16v n/a means lack of torque
|
Paul_J
Member
Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Ojc
Paul small engine size does not mean lack of torque
1.4 8v 156 lb/ft
Talking about N/A, non diesel, non turbo, non tb's etc
|
Ojc
Member
Registered: 14th Nov 00
Location: Reading: Drives : Clio 197
User status: Offline
|
I have torque coming out of my anus
|
Skinz
Member
Registered: 15th May 03
User status: Offline
|
no you just talk out your anus
|
Ojc
Member
Registered: 14th Nov 00
Location: Reading: Drives : Clio 197
User status: Offline
|
Skinz, tell Steve that unless he rings me tonight I won't tell him something about Hannah.
|
Dave A
USER UNDER INVESTIGATION - DO NOT TRADE
Registered: 10th Dec 03
Location: County Durham
User status: Offline
|
i beat vts's and 106 gti's in my gsi
|
Adam_B
Member
Registered: 13th Dec 00
Location: Lancashire
User status: Offline
|
corsas are the best cars in the world ever, everybody knows this, only a few admit it tho.
|
Sly_SRi
Premium Member
Registered: 9th Apr 04
Location: Reading, UK Drives: Corsa C
User status: Offline
|
when the rear of my car was stripped out, it was pretty much a dead heat between mine and paul_J's (i hope he agrees!) and mine has a dbilas....so it seems suprising that a standard stripped out gsi would beat one.
(hadn't read the previous pages)
[Edited on 17-05-2005 by Sly_SRi]
Corsa C Z20Let
Black Sleeper Turbo Project
|
vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Skinz
quote: Originally posted by vibrio
quote: Originally posted by Teddy
.......suggests that the Vauxhall Corsa GSi 16v is not as "fast" as the Citroen Saxo VTS or the Peugeot 106GTi................
I have since found this information to be incorrect.
(even though i only have seats and a dash )
Bulltin Over.
[Edited on 16-05-2005 by Teddy]
so the 8s more the corsa takes to get to 100mph is actually a myth.
Steve say..
apparently removing the seats and some interior of the corsa knocks 8s from the 0-100 time
tell steve he is testing the car on a negative gradient
|
Paul_J
Member
Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Sly_SRi
when the rear of my car was stripped out, it was pretty much a dead heat between mine and paul_J's (i hope he agrees!) and mine has a dbilas....so it seems suprising that a standard stripped out gsi would beat one.
I disagree
The only true race off the line we had was off those lights where I fucked up the start and then put it into 2nd and it went CRUNCH....... and didn't engage at all... I'll give you another race some time now my exhaust is on.
|
Rob_Corsa
Member
Registered: 4th Apr 02
Location: Derbyshire
User status: Offline
|
I had a Vts and now have a 1.6 sport both of which I like(d) and am completly unbiased.
When I had my Vts I had a few races with Gsi's and I was pulled away easily.
As for the performance difference between my sport and my old Vts, very noticable!.
|
ARD1
Member
Registered: 4th May 04
Location: Notts
User status: Offline
|
went from a 2.0lt corsa to a sxo vts, found the defference not very much as the power in the saxo is more useable. but more than the car its the driver that makes the difference
|
kerzo
Member
Registered: 10th Nov 02
Location: Norn Iron
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Corsa_Si_16v
Haven't read all the debating but a standard VTS will still be quicker than a stripped GSi.
But, a stripped GSi may be DRIVEN faster than a standard VTS. When comparing cars of similar power, its all down to the driver and whoever gets the power down first. If the GSi gets it down first, the VTS will always be chasing it.
I was playing with a Xsara VTS last week on serious twisties, was all over the back of him and near enough passing him in my 1.4 16v, so it just goes to show the car is as quick as it can be driven.
Aren't the VTS's close to 170bhp?
Anyway, this has turned into a typical argument and I can't believe I read the entire thread
|
dave17
Member
Registered: 3rd Sep 02
Location: Greater London
User status: Offline
|
this is silly.
VTR beats a 1.4 16v sport (i have one, my mate has one)
VTS beats 1.6 16v sport (my mates have them both)
VTS pulls away easilty all day long.
1.6 16v sport beats VTR, not VTS.
i have experience first hand of them all, driven them, been in passenger seat etc daily. tis the truth.
|