goldfish
Banned
Registered: 7th Feb 03
Location: we have a grass in CS he is a chav
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Joff
quote:
Originally posted by goldfish
quote:
Originally posted by Craig-CorsaGSI
There shit hot quality when u order one, like Sidesport sed they wont put the good quality ones on the site cos people will just rob em 
unless they too the pics with a crap camera then resizing decent quality pics will just mean a small pic of high quality.
unless they increased the JPEG compression level to save on bandwidth costs.
you'd have to question how much they would actually save. those pics are 21kb and are only 480x318. a decent pic reduced to and saved for web using medium-high jpeg quality would give around 16-30kb with decent quality
|
goldfish
Banned
Registered: 7th Feb 03
Location: we have a grass in CS he is a chav
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Joff
quote:
Originally posted by goldfish
quote:
Originally posted by Joff
quote:
Originally posted by Craig-CorsaGSI
There shit hot quality when u order one, like Sidesport sed they wont put the good quality ones on the site cos people will just rob em
It's not the actual image quality that's poor, but the actual photo - all he's doing is taking photos of a car going down a road, hardly going to win any awards for photo of the year.
People buying those must be stupid - Icy could take the same photo himself!
I doubt it
I thought Mr Chan's photo skills were shit hot tbh.
he does not actually take them. he has a sprite which does the pictures. ICY just looks around to check no ones looking
|
Joff
Member
Registered: 17th Oct 00
Location: Cambridgeshire
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by goldfish
quote:
Originally posted by Joff
quote:
Originally posted by goldfish
quote:
Originally posted by Craig-CorsaGSI
There shit hot quality when u order one, like Sidesport sed they wont put the good quality ones on the site cos people will just rob em
unless they too the pics with a crap camera then resizing decent quality pics will just mean a small pic of high quality.
unless they increased the JPEG compression level to save on bandwidth costs.
you'd have to question how much they would actually save. those pics are 21kb and are only 480x318. a decent pic reduced to and saved for web using medium-high jpeg quality would give around 16-30kb with decent quality
Quite a considerable saving given the number of photos and the number of page impressions the site will get.
|
goldfish
Banned
Registered: 7th Feb 03
Location: we have a grass in CS he is a chav
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Joff
quote:
Originally posted by goldfish
quote:
Originally posted by Joff
quote:
Originally posted by goldfish
quote:
Originally posted by Craig-CorsaGSI
There shit hot quality when u order one, like Sidesport sed they wont put the good quality ones on the site cos people will just rob em
unless they too the pics with a crap camera then resizing decent quality pics will just mean a small pic of high quality.
unless they increased the JPEG compression level to save on bandwidth costs.
you'd have to question how much they would actually save. those pics are 21kb and are only 480x318. a decent pic reduced to and saved for web using medium-high jpeg quality would give around 16-30kb with decent quality
Quite a considerable saving given the number of photos and the number of page impressions the site will get.
I compressed a large file to 480x320 and it was 23k. quality was very good. those pics are around 21kb. what the hell did they do to them
|
Joff
Member
Registered: 17th Oct 00
Location: Cambridgeshire
User status: Offline
|
This I do not know 
|
goldfish
Banned
Registered: 7th Feb 03
Location: we have a grass in CS he is a chav
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Joff
This I do not know
yes, my point. they are fools.
|
