corsasport.co.uk
 

Corsa Sport » Message Board » General Chat » Do I have a case?......


New Topic

New Poll
  <<  1    2  >> Subscribe | Add to Favourites

You are not logged in and may not post or reply to messages. Please log in or create a new account or mail us about fixing an existing one - register@corsasport.co.uk

There are also many more features available when you are logged in such as private messages, buddy list, location services, post search and more.


Author Do I have a case?......
GT4Brody
Member

Registered: 26th Sep 01
Location: south
User status: Offline
27th Apr 05 at 21:15   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by Ojc
De-Cat


agreed
GT4Brody
Member

Registered: 26th Sep 01
Location: south
User status: Offline
27th Apr 05 at 21:18   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by Ryan L
quote:
Originally posted by ainsley_brader
The guy at ats probably thought you might buy a new cat!

Even if its collapsed if its not blowing and it meets emission regs its a pass.

You have no issues with the testing station as you have no contract with them!




please dont talk shit, you have a collateral contract with them, i.e. you are third party to the contract between the MOT and dealers, so yes there is a contract


err that is bulls*it mate, what if the cat passed the emissions whilst at the mot station, and then deteriorated soon after? hardly mot testers fault is it??
James
Member

Registered: 1st Jun 02
Location: Surrey
User status: Offline
27th Apr 05 at 21:20   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

yup thats true but the MOT was only carried out 2 days ago
ainsley_brader
Member

Registered: 24th Mar 02
Location: Tattershall, Lincolnshire
User status: Offline
27th Apr 05 at 21:22   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by James
Am i reading that wrong or do those sentences contradict each other?

Doesnt the top one says that the MOT tester is liable and the bottom one says the dealer is liable?

Cheers, James


Basically yes. They are both liable.

For example i run a garage but dont do mots, tyres or paint.

If I had a car come in for MoT i would send it to a 3rd party then do any work needed then send it back for retest. Should it need a tyre i would put it into the tyre place i use.

The customer obviously would only pay me.

No supposing it failed on one tyre and i did nothing at all too it.

If the wheel subsequently fell of it because the tyre fitter hadnt torqued it up correctly, obvioulsy the tyre place would be liable but also so would I.

The same goes for if something was missed on the mot test it wouldnt just be the testers fault but mine also!

Ainsley
GT4Brody
Member

Registered: 26th Sep 01
Location: south
User status: Offline
27th Apr 05 at 21:24   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by James
yup thats true but the MOT was only carried out 2 days ago


tbh mate it is prob a case of the guy knows the mot tester and you know the rest, which is bit off on your part, but you can guarentee the garage well try and wriggle out if it, however you dont get if you dont ask

  <<  1    2  >>
New Topic

New Poll

Corsa Sport » Message Board » General Chat » Do I have a case?...... 23 database queries in 0.0124621 seconds