manchester-lad
Member
Registered: 17th Feb 03
Location: Middleton, Greater Manchester
User status: Offline
|
Hey guys cant make my mind up which one to buy which one would u have cheers
http://www.caraudiocentre.co.uk/product.asp?product=21482
http://www.caraudiocentre.co.uk/product.asp?product=20825
|
Planty02
Member
Registered: 5th Mar 05
Location: Burslem, Stoke-on-Trent
User status: Offline
|
definately pioneer - sony are rubbish for car audio - I had a sony and it was ok at low volumes but when you turn it up the quality is shocking
|
b4l
Member
Registered: 7th Feb 06
User status: Offline
|
pioneer definately.
|
craig_s
Member
Registered: 5th Mar 06
Location: Birmingham Drives: mk4 astra gsi
User status: Offline
|
sony are quite good but pioneer wins everytime .
|
mobymaster
Member
Registered: 12th Sep 04
Location: Rawtenstall, Lancashire
User status: Offline
|
Pioneer...
|
andy hirst
Member
Registered: 18th Apr 02
Location: Rochdale, Greater Manchester
User status: Offline
|
sony are wank
|
Martin
Member
Registered: 15th Mar 04
Location: Dumpstable Drives: Aztec Sxi
User status: Offline
|
at lower end you wont notice much difference TBH. Only in bigger instals or at higher volumes will you notice a difference in SQ.
out of those two id go for SONY. Their new stuff is improving loads. Not rivaling the big guns yet, but a defo improvement.
|
Marc
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: York
User status: Offline
|
Sony make terrible car stereos, which is odd as everything else is brilliant!
BTW, get an Alpine 
|
Martin
Member
Registered: 15th Mar 04
Location: Dumpstable Drives: Aztec Sxi
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Marc
Sony make terrible car stereos, which is odd as everything else is brilliant!
BTW, get an Alpine
this is why i say there stuff is improving. i bet in a budget install, hardly any of you could tell the difference between SONY and Alpine 
|
Marc
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: York
User status: Offline
|
My Dad had a Sony head unit in his old Golf, cd's were fine but radio reception was terrible. I know others that have said the same. My Alpine has both good cd and clear radio reception.
|
Martin
Member
Registered: 15th Mar 04
Location: Dumpstable Drives: Aztec Sxi
User status: Offline
|
how old is the SONY HU? im just trying to give them a chance to be fair mate. there stuff is improving, but will never rival big guns. rockford, alpine, pioneer, nakimich etc etc
|
Marc
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: York
User status: Offline
|
Sony was 1997, so they may have improved. My Alpine was bought in 2003.
|
Gavin
Premium Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: West Midlands
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Planty02
definately pioneer - sony are rubbish for car audio - I had a sony and it was ok at low volumes but when you turn it up the quality is shocking
soooo true!... sony are pretty poor in car audio.....
pionner are top dogs 
[Edited on 30-05-2006 by Gavin]
[Edited on 30-05-2006 by Gavin]
pew pew pew pewwwww
|
craig_s
Member
Registered: 5th Mar 06
Location: Birmingham Drives: mk4 astra gsi
User status: Offline
|
ive got an x plod hu cus i got it cheap and its been fine its lasted nearly three years never had a problemwith it.
|
AdiSRI
Member
Registered: 1st May 02
Location: Berkshire
User status: Offline
|
deffo the pioneer, but id go for a slightly higher spec pioneer if you can afford a bit more either:
http://www.caraudiocentre.co.uk/product.asp?product=21582
or
http://www.caraudiocentre.co.uk/product.asp?product=21657
|
IntaCepta
Member
Registered: 25th Mar 02
Location: Mill Hill East, Greater London
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by sri power
sony are quite
compared to what?
It's no contest, pioneer
|
