Adam-D
Member
Registered: 11th May 02
Location: Cheshire
User status: Offline
|
been told out of the 2 -3 pr 4
one of then is really good for tuning
i cant remeber which one
ideas help etc 
|
Nismo
Member
Registered: 12th Sep 02
User status: Offline
|
3 , think 1 & 2 had 1.8 lumps
|
nik
Member
Registered: 19th Jun 00
User status: Offline
|
1-2 both 2.0, the 1.8 is the 1800GSR. As with all Evos, each newer model has a better engine really. The evo 4 onwards is the one to go for, although the 5 was where the real good engines came in (4's engine has weaker internals etc)
3 is obviously better than 1 and 2 and develops 270bhp and 228 ft/lb. The 1 develops 250bhp and 228 ft/lb and the 2 develops 260hp and same torque. 4 onwards was 280bhp and 274 torque.
[Edited on 25-07-2006 by nik]
[Edited on 25-07-2006 by nik]
|
Adam-D
Member
Registered: 11th May 02
Location: Cheshire
User status: Offline
|
thanks, ill have a look see on prices and availibility
|
SetH
Member
Registered: 15th Jul 01
User status: Offline
|
just remember it takes 305lb/ft torque to climb a 20 degree incline with 3 15 stone moosepigs in a EVO.
|
nik
Member
Registered: 19th Jun 00
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by SetH
just remember it takes 305lb/ft torque to climb a 20 degree incline with 3 15 stone moosepigs in a EVO.
The name of the game is not to carry hippocrocopigs in your motor 
|
Adam-D
Member
Registered: 11th May 02
Location: Cheshire
User status: Offline
|
i wont be thats for sure 
i dont attract "lookers" moosepigs" or anyone for that matter.
|
CRFC
Member
Registered: 26th Jan 05
Location: Ireland
User status: Offline
|
is the evo 4 a bad car? for the sake of one year there priced a lot cheaper than the 5!
|
JadeM
Premium Member
Registered: 9th Feb 06
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by CRFC
is the evo 4 a bad car? for the sake of one year there priced a lot cheaper than the 5!
Some say the 4's better....lights, quicker etc!!!
|
deanmcreynolds26
Member
Registered: 15th Sep 03
Location: E46 //M3
User status: Offline
|
i quite like the 4's as long as they are de-tango'd 
5 and 6 were the best shapes though.
|
nik
Member
Registered: 19th Jun 00
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by JadeM
quote:
Originally posted by CRFC
is the evo 4 a bad car? for the sake of one year there priced a lot cheaper than the 5!
Some say the 4's better....lights, quicker etc!!!
Quicker?  I'd tell them their speaking from their non-evo-knowhow arse. The 4 is ok, just weaker internals etc still very reliable and fine unless your talking of tuning it in which case once your getting into the 400s your go for forged internals anyway
VI TME RS or Monte Carlo is where it's at though
Pic of my old TME..
|
gavin18787
Premium Member
Registered: 22nd Feb 05
Location: Basildon, Essex
User status: Offline
|
nik that car is sex  why did you get rid of it?
Drives supercharged Tec with torque
|
Adam-D
Member
Registered: 11th May 02
Location: Cheshire
User status: Offline
|
i think ill go for a evo 3 and get a good one, instead of buying a ropey 4
have 5k bugeted, seen a couple, wont be till xmas ish but i can find out good bad etc before i buy
|
JadeM
Premium Member
Registered: 9th Feb 06
User status: Offline
|
4 looks so much better & is a better car!!
|
Adam-D
Member
Registered: 11th May 02
Location: Cheshire
User status: Offline
|
i like the look of the 4 but on my budget id rather get a good 3 than a ropey 4
but feel free to enlighten me i am quite ignorant and need information
|
JadeM
Premium Member
Registered: 9th Feb 06
User status: Offline
|
I dont know that much about them either!! U on the lancer register??
I just think personally id hold out for a 4....especially if your talking 6months + the prices will continue to fall!!
|
JadeM
Premium Member
Registered: 9th Feb 06
User status: Offline
|
http://atsearch.autotrader.co.uk/www/CARS_popup.asp?modelexact=1&lid=search_used_cars_full&make=MITSUBISHI&model=LANCER&variant=evo+4&keywords=&min_pr=75&max_pr=6000&mileage=&agerange=&postcode=fk3+9dh&miles=200&max_records=50&source=0&photo=1&sort=3&ukcarsearch_full=SEARCH&start=1&distance=41&adcategory=CARS&channel=CARS&id=200629243654493
Bargain!!
That would have set you back 10-12k a few years ago...my mates had 2 evo 4's & he loves it!! Rolled the 1st one into a roundabout showing off so got another exactly the same!!
[Edited on 26-07-2006 by JadeM]
|
Adam-D
Member
Registered: 11th May 02
Location: Cheshire
User status: Offline
|
ill see when the time comes, i can haggle with price as a wad of cash waved in ppl's face usually is a great motorvator
|
JadeM
Premium Member
Registered: 9th Feb 06
User status: Offline
|
Prices should be lower in England aswell!! Some folk up here still want 7-8k for an Evo 2/3
|
Adam-D
Member
Registered: 11th May 02
Location: Cheshire
User status: Offline
|
lmao fuck that off ...
|
nik
Member
Registered: 19th Jun 00
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by gavin18787
nik that car is sex why did you get rid of it?
Got bored of it after 2 years and the image is getting a bit chav now
|
