liamC
Member
Registered: 28th Feb 04
User status: Offline
|
Was this setup to give a few people some jobs to bring the unemployment rate down?
Fuck me, what a pile of shite.
For example, an & is now not acceptable, and instead you have to type &
Utterly pointless.
Wankers.
|
James
Member
Registered: 1st Jun 02
Location: Surrey
User status: Offline
|
It's never really been acceptable, now theres a validator to tell you 
|
liamC
Member
Registered: 28th Feb 04
User status: Offline
|
Is it worth using this validator thing mate do you think?
I;m going through and amending utterly pointless things which I can't see the point of.
[Edited on 16-01-2007 by liamC]
|
James
Member
Registered: 1st Jun 02
Location: Surrey
User status: Offline
|
Depends what the sites for.
For a company? Uni project?
|
liamC
Member
Registered: 28th Feb 04
User status: Offline
|
Both mate.
It's for a company, for my Uni project.
|
James
Member
Registered: 1st Jun 02
Location: Surrey
User status: Offline
|
Then yeah it's probably worth it, mention in your writeup that you have ensured it is fully W3C compliant to make the site accessible to all users - should get you brownie points.
|
liamC
Member
Registered: 28th Feb 04
User status: Offline
|
Aye, I thought as much cheers.
Check this absolute joke.
quote:
Error Line 42 column 35: NET-enabling start-tag not immediately followed by null end-tag.
<param name="MOVIE" value=images/banner.swf" />
This error may occur when there is a mistake in how a self-closing tag is closed, e.g '.../ >'. The proper syntax is '... />' (note the position of the space).
It thinks it was supposed to be a <br> or whatever so it identifies it as an error when it really isnt.
[Edited on 16-01-2007 by liamC]
|
James
Member
Registered: 1st Jun 02
Location: Surrey
User status: Offline
|
I think its because you missed off the opening " before images and its confused.
|
liamC
Member
Registered: 28th Feb 04
User status: Offline
|
No mate, it told me to take that off before and it checked out.
I think I have to do something in the code to tell it that it isn't an error and that it is meant to be like that - hence the shorttag. A few other errors mention a "shorttag" also
|
