Alex_Rally
Member
Registered: 6th Sep 09
Location: Tyne and Wear, gateshead
User status: Offline
|
any1 know the insurance group they are looked on parkers and they quote the new figures of 24 for the 1.8 whats that in old numbers lol
[Edited on 12-12-2010 by geordie_corsa]
|
Rich H
Member
Registered: 26th Oct 05
Location: West Sussex Drives: E46 M3
User status: Offline
|
It seems to be basically double on the new groups, so on that basis, around 12
|
All Torque
Member
Registered: 17th Nov 05
Location: Milton Keynes Drives: Ford Focus TDCi
User status: Offline
|
13
|
Alex_Rally
Member
Registered: 6th Sep 09
Location: Tyne and Wear, gateshead
User status: Offline
|
bit higher than i thought
|
richc
Member
Registered: 24th Mar 07
Location: Ilkeston
User status: Offline
|
I dint realise they had changed...i thought it was a typo. I looked at my car for a laugh and it was like 33...i thought must got the mpg coloum wrong
|
Fonz
Premium Member
Registered: 12th May 06
Location: Newbury, Berks
User status: Offline
|
mine, a 1.6 '93 plate is/was group 11
edit: take a look at Wisebuyers, they still use the traditional system
http://www.wisebuyers.co.uk/motoring/car-specifications/Mazda/MX-5+%281990-05%29/MA000135/
[Edited on 13-12-2010 by Fonz]
|
baza31
Member
Registered: 19th Apr 03
Location: yorkshire
User status: Offline
|
why are you buying an mx5?
|
Alex_Rally
Member
Registered: 6th Sep 09
Location: Tyne and Wear, gateshead
User status: Offline
|
am not baz was thinking about getting the wife 1 but wanted to get the 1.8 so i could use it now and then thought it would be fun to have a go in now and then
|