corsasport.co.uk
 

Corsa Sport » Message Board » Help Zone, Modification and ICE Advice » FAQ :- People who know ALOT about Turbo's


New Topic

New Poll
  <<  1    2  >> Subscribe | Add to Favourites

You are not logged in and may not post or reply to messages. Please log in or create a new account or mail us about fixing an existing one - register@corsasport.co.uk

There are also many more features available when you are logged in such as private messages, buddy list, location services, post search and more.


Author FAQ :- People who know ALOT about Turbo's
BeArDy
Member

Registered: 7th Aug 00
Location: Manchester
User status: Offline
20th Dec 03 at 09:41   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

http://www.corsasport.co.uk/board/viewthread.php?tid=108682&pid=1294143#pid1294143

i am not really into turbos and do not know much about how they are worked etc
so from what i am reading i can take (Example) :

-take a Corsa 1.2 16v Manifold have it made to take a very small turbo.
-then have all the pipe work made to it feeds the inlet.
-have the inlet made to take the piping.
-take it to a Chip/ECU place and have them make a ECU up

then i have a full running 1.2 16v turbo corsa?

as with low PSI turbos u do not needed any of the internals changed



anyone help me out here?
Demo
Member

Registered: 27th Sep 01
Location: south wales Drives: astra sri ecoflex
User status: Offline
20th Dec 03 at 10:13   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

i would never reccomend anyone having a turbo on an engine that came outta the factory as n/a. youre right in saying that when running low boost you dont need the internals changed, but then the gain of power for the money youre spending seems a bit of a waste. and things can still go wrong. my mate had the first turbo zetec-s in the country (apart from the van aaken demo car) and he had endless problems with a conversion that was supposedly perfect. made me think twice about turboing n/a engines
miles
Member

Registered: 25th Mar 02
Location: plymouth Drives: Astra Sport
User status: Offline
20th Dec 03 at 11:51   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

It would produce jack all power.

You'd want an intercooler.

I dont see why the inlet would need modifying.

You might want to look into oil cooling.

I dont know what chips would be able to sort this out.

It would purely be a turbo for the sake of having a turbo, not for power.

Would probably prove unreliable.
thane
Member

Registered: 9th Nov 03
Location: Lincoln/Scunthorpe - white sri-b
User status: Offline
20th Dec 03 at 11:59   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

as sum1 who makes turbos for a living (BIG ones for trains & ships) the amount of work needed and reliability issues as pointed out would make it pointless. van aaken used to do smaller blowers for small cc cars but are tending to look into superchargers. as demo said, van aakens turbo zs was good but had no end of problems (I used to hang on zetecs forum) so much so they stopped doing them and switched to a supercharger.

better off with an engine transplant, more power, reliabilty etc for the same money

[Edited on 20-12-2003 by thane]
BeArDy
Member

Registered: 7th Aug 00
Location: Manchester
User status: Offline
20th Dec 03 at 12:25   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by miles
It would produce jack all power.

You'd want an intercooler.

I dont see why the inlet would need modifying.

You might want to look into oil cooling.

I dont know what chips would be able to sort this out.

It would purely be a turbo for the sake of having a turbo, not for power.

Would probably prove unreliable.


yes i know about the power i am just find out what the score is on fitting turbos
-ok so dont need to mod the inlet
-intercoolers ye dident think of that
-oil cooling not a problem really
-ECU i know a place that will do custom ECU an remaps for about 400

what about the oil feed for the turbos any ideas?

anything else to think about
thane
Member

Registered: 9th Nov 03
Location: Lincoln/Scunthorpe - white sri-b
User status: Offline
20th Dec 03 at 12:34   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

ducting, insulation, waste gate, oil feeds and returns, suitable mounts, air feed (need to see a td corsa for that). remember, a low pressure turbo will still create heat, and it will need to go somewhere. an oil cooler would be a good idea and an intercooler mite not be strictly necessary. how exactly is the blower gonna mate up to block, cos id though you would need some good steel/sg iron for that?
miles
Member

Registered: 25th Mar 02
Location: plymouth Drives: Astra Sport
User status: Offline
20th Dec 03 at 19:12   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

A remap like a superchip wont be able to take positive pressure into account with a n/a ecu. I doubt unichips can either. You'd need to look into another bodge like a 5h injector unless you want to spend £550+ on a proper ecu + loom then get it mapped.

Oil feeds can be done with a oil cooler take off plate, this can also be used for an oil cooler if wanted as well, obviously.

If your running std compression then not using intercooler would be even more of a suicide mission!!

Will need a custom downpipe.

Any weaknesses in the engine would show up, and need uprating.

You'd really want at least a fat head gasket to lower the compression as well.
blackula
Member

Registered: 26th Apr 03
Location: Cheshire
User status: Offline
21st Dec 03 at 02:04   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Other factors , compression ratio on NA from the factory cars, is too high, limiting capabilites in general without extreme expense.

You can run good boost with stuff like water injection and intercoolers buts its all more expense.

As an example of an extremely weird factory turbo setup....

Metro Turbo, an ageing but tough A series engine, with the same CR as the other metrols, namly 9.4 - 1 limiting the boost it coudl take without the compression being lowered (Avonbars conversion lowered it to 7.4 -1) and it ran something like 4 psi boost with a big (for a 1.3 Metro) Garrett T3 turbo.

Yes the T3 was used in the Lotus Esprit and first Cossies, and was too big, the reason they used it was cos it ran cooler and at low boost was relaible and less chance of overheating and oil cooking than a T2.

Total power was 93 bhp. They wanted to use 7psi boost and get 110 bho but they figured the warranty claims on gearboxes would be too much.

So using a larger turbo has lag problems and more cost, but less restrictive, runs cooler, doesn't cook the oil and can provide a good boost at low pressure.

Example of a bad use of Turbo, the T2 on the 1800 Silvia......ran too hot and was restrictive, but spooled up quick.


miles
Member

Registered: 25th Mar 02
Location: plymouth Drives: Astra Sport
User status: Offline
21st Dec 03 at 12:15   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

9.4-1 CR is low for a n/a car anyway, I imagin the 1.2 16v is something like 10.5-1.

I think the LET is 9.0 - 1
Fester
Member

Registered: 9th Oct 01
Location: Lancaster
User status: Offline
21st Dec 03 at 16:43   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

I don't think this has been mentioned but the sump would need to come off and you'd have to weld on a small lug for the oil return
vibrio
Banned

Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
21st Dec 03 at 21:19   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

unichip can be used to map a forced induction conversion. 1.2 could make serious power depending on the strength of the block.

U2U'd you Beardy. forgot about oil cooler
WARPED
Member

Registered: 12th Jun 02
Location: Stoke + Wolves - Corsa Sport
User status: Offline
21st Dec 03 at 21:22   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

think there was a turbo technics corsa 1.2 turbo on ebay couple of weeks back

anyone remember it ? ? ?
J da Silva
Member

Registered: 10th Apr 03
Location: The FACTory
User status: Offline
21st Dec 03 at 21:22   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by miles
9.4-1 CR is low for a n/a car anyway, I imagin the 1.2 16v is something like 10.5-1.

I think the LET is 9.0 - 1



Let's are 9.2-1
WARPED
Member

Registered: 12th Jun 02
Location: Stoke + Wolves - Corsa Sport
User status: Offline
21st Dec 03 at 21:24   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=2435091851&category=9858

its an 8v though i think, just thought might be of some help to ya
J da Silva
Member

Registered: 10th Apr 03
Location: The FACTory
User status: Offline
21st Dec 03 at 21:27   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

you can get LET's to 8.5:1 though miles
miles
Member

Registered: 25th Mar 02
Location: plymouth Drives: Astra Sport
User status: Offline
22nd Dec 03 at 08:10   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

You could get a 1.2 16v to 8.5:1, but he doesn't want to change the compression.
vibrio
Banned

Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
22nd Dec 03 at 12:24   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

the 1.2 not quite high though. 10.5:1
J da Silva
Member

Registered: 10th Apr 03
Location: The FACTory
User status: Offline
22nd Dec 03 at 13:19   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by miles
You could get a 1.2 16v to 8.5:1, but he doesn't want to change the compression.


why bring it up then?
Paul_J
Member

Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
22nd Dec 03 at 16:36   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Why do you ask beardy? and why have you chosen a 1.2 16v?
mike16v
Member

Registered: 20th May 02
Location: sheffield, yorkshire
User status: Offline
22nd Dec 03 at 17:07   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

my guess is he is after earning himself a bob or 2

[Edited on 22-12-2003 by mike16v]
miles
Member

Registered: 25th Mar 02
Location: plymouth Drives: Astra Sport
User status: Offline
22nd Dec 03 at 17:15   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by VenomTurbo
quote:
Originally posted by miles
You could get a 1.2 16v to 8.5:1, but he doesn't want to change the compression.


why bring it up then?


I dont get you? I meant with a piston change you could get the compression down to 8.5:1 if you wanted.
miles
Member

Registered: 25th Mar 02
Location: plymouth Drives: Astra Sport
User status: Offline
22nd Dec 03 at 17:15   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Doing it to earn a bob or 2 is opening a huge can of worms!
J da Silva
Member

Registered: 10th Apr 03
Location: The FACTory
User status: Offline
22nd Dec 03 at 18:04   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

what i mean is, u were on my back coz i told u about LET compression ratio's, yet u mentioned it before i posted, was just informing u thats all, cant harm anything can it
Paul_J
Member

Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
22nd Dec 03 at 19:39   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by mike16v
my guess is he is after earning himself a bob or 2

[Edited on 22-12-2003 by mike16v]


how do you mean? learning to make his own turbos to supply to 1.2 16v owners? if the price is right and it works I'll be up for it
miles
Member

Registered: 25th Mar 02
Location: plymouth Drives: Astra Sport
User status: Offline
22nd Dec 03 at 19:43   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

I misread your post saying 'why bring it up then? As why 'bring up' the compression.

If your on about bringing things up then why mention you can get the let to 8.5:1 when you could do that to any engine?

  <<  1    2  >>
New Topic

New Poll

  Related Threads Author Forum Replies Views Last Post
Can you fight? Craig W General Chat 91 2827
25th Jun 03 at 20:48
by Fwaza esquire
 
All you Technical people out there! madboutcars General Chat 35 2200
12th Sep 03 at 06:37
by madboutcars
 
some new pics of my car Dave Helium General Chat 40 1973
24th Feb 04 at 16:59
by heliumhead
 

Corsa Sport » Message Board » Help Zone, Modification and ICE Advice » FAQ :- People who know ALOT about Turbo's 27 database queries in 0.0233090 seconds