vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
Before
 After 
I created a quick mask and set a gradient moving from top to bottom. went back to pic and did levels and saturation. did contrast on whole pic then noise ninja and saved
[Edited on 21-08-2005 by vibrio]
|
3CorsaMeal
Member
Registered: 11th Apr 02
User status: Offline
|
ever taken lots of pics of same thing, but in different modes then overlayed the imagines?
they do it when taking pics of planets/space etc
|
Edd
Member
Registered: 8th Nov 04
Location: Glasgow
User status: Offline
|
the bottom of the improved one seems very dark
|
vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Edd_20
the bottom of the improved one seems very dark
it is 
|
vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by 3CorsaMeal
ever taken lots of pics of same thing, but in different modes then overlayed the imagines?
they do it when taking pics of planets/space etc
to get a star trail 
|
Edd
Member
Registered: 8th Nov 04
Location: Glasgow
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by vibrio
quote:
Originally posted by Edd_20
the bottom of the improved one seems very dark
it is
 oh thank god for that just thought it was me
|
Corsa_Sri_93
Member
Registered: 25th Jun 02
Location: Bitchin' Hitchin
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Edd_20
the bottom of the improved one seems very dark
Vibs doesn't like the grass at the bottom of the pic. That's probably why!
|
Ian
Site Administrator
Registered: 28th Aug 99
Location: Liverpool
User status: Online
|
Field is too dark. Grass is also, but it would be better not there at all.
Toooooooo much saturation though! You love that!
|
vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
I'm a velvia fan
|
Nismo
Member
Registered: 12th Sep 02
User status: Offline
|
have to agree with Ian ross you use to much saturation , you need your eyes tested
[Edited on 28-08-2005 by Nismo]
|
vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
or maybe your moniters need calibrated like mine are.
|
Nismo
Member
Registered: 12th Sep 02
User status: Offline
|
i very much doubt it 
|
Nismo
Member
Registered: 12th Sep 02
User status: Offline
|
actually it would now appear that we have stumbled on the problem , your isnt calibrated and thats why you think it looks good
|
Ian
Site Administrator
Registered: 28th Aug 99
Location: Liverpool
User status: Online
|
It looks impressive because its unnatural, same reason wide angles or extreme telephoto generally look interesting, its because your eye wouldn't normally see things like that, or colours like that in the sky in that pic. I personally think it stops being a photo and starts becoming abstract colour and shape when you mess too much.
|
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
|
i agree Ian, i feel the same about Ross' ass, the more i look, the more un-natural it appears
|
vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
I don;t see it as anything more than putting filters on the lens or adjusted the saturation in the dark room. I used to be like you Ian but nowadays most pictures you see are adjusted in photoshop. I use filters on the camera and grads in photoshop but do remember that my moniters are calibrated and that it is more than likely they will look off colour wise light or dark too.
|
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
|
do you degauss frequently?
|
Ian
Site Administrator
Registered: 28th Aug 99
Location: Liverpool
User status: Online
|
It looks good - but that isn't how the world looks!
|
vibrio
Banned
Registered: 28th Feb 01
Location: POAH
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Ian
It looks good - but that isn't how the world looks!
this is true
|
