jr
Member
Registered: 20th May 02
Location: Kent
User status: Offline
|
Tried serching but cant find it on the net, Help
|
Matt H
Member
Registered: 11th Sep 01
Location: South Yorkshire
User status: Offline
|
Dont they do it by the ton?
|
willay
Moderator Organiser: South East, National Events Premium Member
Registered: 10th Nov 02
Location: Roydon, Essex
User status: Offline
|
quote:
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
Power-to-weight ratio is a measure commonly used when comparing various vehicles (or engines), including automobiles, motorcycles and aircraft. It is, simply, the power the engine develops, divided by the vehicle's or (or engine) weight.
The power-to-weight ratio is often used as an indication of likely accelerative performance. Vehicle weights have relatively little impact on top speed, which is mostly dependent on aerodynamic drag (see drag equation). Acceleration, on the other hand, is dominated by the Newtonian acceleration term, F = m \times a, so more force (F - from the engine's torque delivered to the driven wheels or thrust delivered by an aircraft engine), will deliver more acceleration (a) for any given vehicle mass (m = weight/g).
In any vehicle the engine power-to-weight ratio is essential for vehicle power-to-weight ratio. But in an aircraft it's more critical than in any other vehicle because any additional weight requires more lift to be generated by the wings in order to lift it. More lift from the wings automatically means more drag, through a process known as induced drag, slowing the plane down. Thus if any two engines deliver the same power, the lighter one will result in a better plane. Power-to-weight ratio therefore has a much more important impact on overall performance in aircraft, including top speed.
In this usage the power-to-weight ratio is typically used to refer to the weight of the engine alone, as a useful way of comparing various aircraft engines. The term applying to the aircraft as a whole is power loading, and is used especially in helicopter engineering.
See also specific power.
|
willay
Moderator Organiser: South East, National Events Premium Member
Registered: 10th Nov 02
Location: Roydon, Essex
User status: Offline
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power-to-weight_ratio
searched for 'power to weight ratio' on google, second entry
|
Tim
Site Administrator
Registered: 21st Apr 00
User status: Offline
|
Divide power by weight... data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8bf1/c8bf1d8321ac16fcd193b8d5a945f68313c1441d" alt=""
|
jr
Member
Registered: 20th May 02
Location: Kent
User status: Offline
|
sorry i should have said, no paulJ style essays either
|
corb
Member
Registered: 24th Apr 02
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
User status: Offline
|
how much power has your car got james?
|
jr
Member
Registered: 20th May 02
Location: Kent
User status: Offline
|
chhers tim, thats gives me 0.1856594 though. what the fuck does that mean
|
Teddy
Member
Registered: 19th Jul 04
Location: Northampton Drives: VW Bora 1.9TDi pd130
User status: Offline
|
Power per tonne.
So if your car has 100bhp and weighs 1000kg you have 100bhp per tonne.
If you have 200bhp and 500kg then you have 400bhp per tonne.
Simple maths really.
I know your car weighs 780kg - whats the power and ill work it out for you.
|
jr
Member
Registered: 20th May 02
Location: Kent
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by corb
how much power has your car got james?
estimate of 145bhp
|
corb
Member
Registered: 24th Apr 02
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
User status: Offline
|
about 207bhp per ton(metric ton)
|
Half Pint
Member
Registered: 25th Mar 02
User status: Offline
|
how you get that, write the calc down !!
[Edited on 21-11-2005 by Half Pint]
|
Teddy
Member
Registered: 19th Jul 04
Location: Northampton Drives: VW Bora 1.9TDi pd130
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by jr
chhers tim, thats gives me 0.1856594 though. what the fuck does that mean
Yep thats it you have 185bhp per tonne.
|
jr
Member
Registered: 20th May 02
Location: Kent
User status: Offline
|
ah right, cheers lads
|
corb
Member
Registered: 24th Apr 02
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
User status: Offline
|
forget that, i did it as your car weighing 700kg, its more than that, teddy's got it
|
jr
Member
Registered: 20th May 02
Location: Kent
User status: Offline
|
if only corb
|
Half Pint
Member
Registered: 25th Mar 02
User status: Offline
|
so my clio is about 150bhp per ton
|
jr
Member
Registered: 20th May 02
Location: Kent
User status: Offline
|
If my plans for 2006 spec go ahead i should have 243bhp per tonne
|
corb
Member
Registered: 24th Apr 02
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
User status: Offline
|
lets assume my car weighs 900kg and is 300bhp, 333bhp per ton
|
jr
Member
Registered: 20th May 02
Location: Kent
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by corb
lets assume my car weighs 900kg and is 300bhp, 333bhp per ton
forced inductions car by law have to carry 100kg of lead to make it fair
|
corb
Member
Registered: 24th Apr 02
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
User status: Offline
|
make that 300bhp per ton then
|
jr
Member
Registered: 20th May 02
Location: Kent
User status: Offline
|
fuck, should have said more
|
corb
Member
Registered: 24th Apr 02
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
User status: Offline
|
you gonna get your car to 190bhp then james?
theres a 14xe/16xe on ebay at the mo for £4k with SBD 185 kit on it.
|
jr
Member
Registered: 20th May 02
Location: Kent
User status: Offline
|
i dont have 4k mr corb and 180-190 is the aim
|
Half Pint
Member
Registered: 25th Mar 02
User status: Offline
|
why not buy a crotch rocket and turbo it data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8bf1/c8bf1d8321ac16fcd193b8d5a945f68313c1441d" alt=""
that'll be way faster !
|