Robbo
Member
Registered: 6th Aug 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
I think Peter reid got it exactly right... you have to have the courage of your convictions... if he thought Walcott was good enough to take then, in the face of crippling problems up front, he has to use him!!! Its unforgivebale, with our 2 main strikers not fit going into the tournament, to waste a space if he has no intention of using him! Fair enough he selected him but why not use him 
JJ - was his place deserved when you had so much CM cover in OH, MC and perhaps even Becks?! Should that place have been sacrificed forr another striker?
Goalies... who else do we have??!
Lennon... under used in my opinion, I said how well important I thought Becks was butI also said it didn't ,mean he had to play 90 minutes every game and I thought he played too long IMO!
Opinions?
|
Marc
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: York
User status: Offline
|
I think we could have used Walcot during the first or second group match games. I think yesterdays match was possibly too big for him, but given our situation I think he should have played.
Why take him if he had no intention of playing him?
|
Robbo
Member
Registered: 6th Aug 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Marc
Why take him if he had no intention of playing him?
Basically, all we needed to say 
|
MarkM
Member
Registered: 11th Apr 01
Location: Liverpool
User status: Offline
|
Svens a cunt...simple...
Lack of strikers and people along for the ride...
Blame Sven
|
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Marc
Why take him if he had no intention of playing him?
Ask David Dein. He has far too much say in those matters. He wants his new investment to be talked about, and talked about he has been.
Cynical view yes, but IMO there is some truth in it.
|
