iceman
Member
Registered: 22nd Jul 00
Location: Berkshire
User status: Offline
|
346bhp / 342ft/lbs Graph will be up later on once i have got it emailed over 
Well happy with that thought it would only make 310/310 man it feels like a total different car
Stu
[Edited on 08-11-2006 by iceman]
|
Jambo
Member
Registered: 8th Sep 01
Location: Maidenhead, Drives: VXR Arctic
User status: Offline
|
Good news chap, i await my first flight on air P1 
|
Nismo
Member
Registered: 12th Sep 02
User status: Offline
|
cool , sounds like a beast now
You going any further with it?
|
mav
Member
Registered: 19th Jun 01
Location: Scotland
User status: Offline
|
cool...nice power..
|
big eck
Member
Registered: 20th Apr 03
Location: Tullibody. Drives - Audi B8 S4 & Fiesta Zetec-S
User status: Offline
|
I take it that it only needed mapped??? No additional parts
|
Brett
Premium Member
Registered: 16th Dec 02
Location: Manchester
User status: Offline
|
That's got to have had some mods surely  Nice figure that tho
Mine got 318bhp 314lbs torque when it was remapped and that's just with full straight through decatted exhaust.
|
iceman
Member
Registered: 22nd Jul 00
Location: Berkshire
User status: Offline
|
it has remapped now running 1.4 bar boost, Blitz exhaust sti panel filter, platinum spark plugs and vpower..
Normally these engines with that get between 310-320 the mapper said the engine was extremely strong to produce that power.
|
iceman
Member
Registered: 22nd Jul 00
Location: Berkshire
User status: Offline
|
oh by the way it still has the cat in
|
SetH
Member
Registered: 15th Jul 01
User status: Offline
|
dood i dont wanna piss on your fire but thats a very high figure considering its a near standard car?
have you posted on SN or SIDC, what did they say on there?
how many runs did they do? expect a 2nd and 3rd run would be a lot less powerwise due to heatsoak as your running the TMIC.
Im not trying to be a arguemntative twat with these comments by the way.
|
iceman
Member
Registered: 22nd Jul 00
Location: Berkshire
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by SetH
dood i dont wanna piss on your fire but thats a very high figure considering its a near standard car?
have you posted on SN or SIDC, what did they say on there?
how many runs did they do? expect a 2nd and 3rd run would be a lot less powerwise due to heatsoak as your running the TMIC.
Im not trying to be a arguemntative twat with these comments by the way.
i know what your saying even Bob R couldnt believe the figures he was seeing but the graph will show you when i recieve it
|
Steve
Premium Member
Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
|
another case of dodgy rollers then
sounds good for 310/320 though which isnt to be laughed at
TBH never take your car somewhere for say a remap and expect to know the end figure based on a rolling road
best is to get it done before then after purely so you know the difference, the end figure means nothing most of the time
[Edited on 04-11-2006 by Steve]
|
IvIarkgraham
Premium Member
Registered: 27th Mar 04
Location: Ellesmere Port, Cheshire
User status: Offline
|
my bro's was a 2.2 with decat and loads of other stuff
his was only 360odd
|
SetH
Member
Registered: 15th Jul 01
User status: Offline
|
Mine made 340/320 @ 1.4 bar with the following spec. I know you had 280 to start with but i guess like the STi`s its probably closer to 300 stock. Still seems to high for what youve got, guess you could always try another set of rollers sometime in the near future? Still least you know youve got a potent and healthy lump
EJ20 engine from API Impreza
2005 WRX pistons
GEN GT SPEC II headers and turbo uppipe
HKS SSQ Blow off valve
550 CC Injectors
Hybrid FMIC
Greddy Catch Can
TD05 Turbo converted to front entry
Apexi Power FC
SX FPR Decat Hayward and scott exhaust
|
Mattb
Member
Registered: 2nd Feb 03
Location: Under your sisters bed
User status: Offline
|
was that at power engineering stu?
|
iceman
Member
Registered: 22nd Jul 00
Location: Berkshire
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Steve
another case of dodgy rollers then
sounds good for 310/320 though which isnt to be laughed at
TBH never take your car somewhere for say a remap and expect to know the end figure based on a rolling road
best is to get it done before then after purely so you know the difference, the end figure means nothing most of the time
[Edited on 04-11-2006 by Steve]
cant be dodgy rollers as it wasnt dont on a rolling road Steve, it was done on a private test track, The car was mapped live on the road..
All will be revealed which i get the graph
[Edited on 05-11-2006 by iceman]
|
Steve
Premium Member
Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
|
even more innaccurate then. I have software that works out bhp using calculations from the ecu, it is not accurate, less so then a rr
|
Reedy
Member
Registered: 11th Apr 04
Location: Hammersmith
User status: Offline
|
great news iceman thats some impressive figures
|
CORSA NUT
Member
Registered: 3rd Aug 01
Location: Wirral
User status: Offline
|
|
Marc
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: York
User status: Offline
|
I wouldn't trust a rolling road, they're only good for mapping a car for the road. BHP figures might as well be pulled out of a hat and are only good for forum bragging rights.
|
Steve
Premium Member
Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Marc
I wouldn't trust a rolling road, they're only good for mapping a car for the road. BHP figures might as well be pulled out of a hat and are only good for forum bragging rights.
did ypou read it was done via ODB on a laptop  even worse than a rolling road
|
Dave A
USER UNDER INVESTIGATION - DO NOT TRADE
Registered: 10th Dec 03
Location: County Durham
User status: Offline
|
mapped on the road, must be the shittest most unproffesional way to map an ecu.
when mapping an ecu you need to get the engine to each precise rpm point, hold it, set the fuelling and check the ignition, run the engine down and then take it up past that point to get a good idea wether or not the fuelling and ignition is set correctly.
how the fcuk do you map the load site for 6500 rpm on the public highway???
some tuners will map on a rr then do a road test with everything plugged in to check the map based on 'real world' conditions but mapping completely on a RR is never accurate.
got some videos somewhere of mapping being done on a RR. shows what you do when mapping an ecu. If I could find them you would understand what I mean
|
Marc
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 02
Location: York
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Steve
did ypou read it was done via ODB on a laptop even worse than a rolling road
|
Dave A
USER UNDER INVESTIGATION - DO NOT TRADE
Registered: 10th Dec 03
Location: County Durham
User status: Offline
|
here is that vid I mentioned:
http://www.forcedfours.com/Downloads/Macellaro/MPT01.wmv
|
Shrek
Member
Registered: 2nd Nov 06
Location: Berkshire
User status: Offline
|
if it made that sorta horse power, then so what, its not impossible and it is perfectly possible to map a car when on the road and even more possible concidering he was using a "test track!!!" so he could happily drive at 6500rpm all day long! this car is easily running this sorta power and if any of the skeptics went out in it, trust me its smiles for miles
some people are just lucky when it comes to engine power and some arent
good figures ice
|
Dave A
USER UNDER INVESTIGATION - DO NOT TRADE
Registered: 10th Dec 03
Location: County Durham
User status: Offline
|
not disputing the figures in any way,
I am just noting that that method of mapping is never as accurate as on a RR. if you watch the video above you will see why. also I think the 'test track' comment was a joke.
|
