corsasport.co.uk
  Not logged in [Login - Register]  
You Are Not Registered Or Not Logged In  

Corsa Sport » Message Board » Off Day » Sports Day » Manchester United is losing money and looking to be sold on?


New Topic
New Poll 		  <<  1    2  >> Subscribe | Add to Favourites

You are not logged in and may not post or reply to messages. Please log in or create a new account or mail us about fixing an existing one - register@corsasport.co.uk

There are also many more features available when you are logged in such as private messages, buddy list, location services, post search and more.


Author Manchester United is losing money and looking to be sold on?
Ben D
Member
Registered: 25th Apr 05
Location: South West
User status: Offline
   25th Feb 11 at 13:10   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
Nope, Quite the opposite, Debt's going down and we're making even more money

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11667_6777386,00.html
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
25th Feb 11 at 13:10   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
Awaits doubters.
Hammer
Member
Registered: 11th Feb 04
User status: Offline
25th Feb 11 at 13:25   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
United, like many other clubs, are an institution that it would most likely take the gates of hell to freeze over before it went bust. Madrid have spent outwith their means for decades and they could still go out and spend 200 million in the blink of an eye.
mwg
Member
Registered: 19th Feb 04
Location: South Lakes
User status: Offline
25th Feb 11 at 13:36   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
All I ever hear from bloody Man City fans is how our time is up and we're going bust etc.

I've given up bothering saying anything back to them now, I know we aren't going bust and make plenty of money and most people know that too apart from numb City fans. One tried telling me yesterday they've spent less on players than we have
Ben D
Member
Registered: 25th Apr 05
Location: South West
User status: Offline
25th Feb 11 at 13:41   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
MWG, they spent more on Milner alone than we did on Smalling & the amazing Bebe.
Robbo
Member
Registered: 6th Aug 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
25th Feb 11 at 13:45   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
But Utd HAVE spent more than Man City on players
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
25th Feb 11 at 13:46   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Robbo
But Utd HAVE spent more than Man City on players


Over how long, thats the missing equation.
Robbo
Member
Registered: 6th Aug 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
25th Feb 11 at 13:47   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
Over any period other than the past 2/3 years, significantly more
mwg
Member
Registered: 19th Feb 04
Location: South Lakes
User status: Offline
25th Feb 11 at 13:47   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Robbo
But Utd HAVE spent more than Man City on players


Since the beginning of the PL City have now spent more than anyone else!
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
25th Feb 11 at 13:48   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by mwg
quote:
Originally posted by Robbo
But Utd HAVE spent more than Man City on players


Since the beginning of the PL City have now spent more than anyone else!


BOOM!
Robbo
Member
Registered: 6th Aug 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
25th Feb 11 at 13:49   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by mwg
quote:
Originally posted by Robbo
But Utd HAVE spent more than Man City on players


Since the beginning of the PL City have now spent more than anyone else!
that cannot be true
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
25th Feb 11 at 13:49   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
I can believe it. City have bought a team of £20m+ players where as United used to buy one a year.
Robbo
Member
Registered: 6th Aug 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
25th Feb 11 at 13:52   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
Chelsea spent shedloads tho

Liverfool and the SPuds have spent hundreds of millions over the years, imaine how much when you consider they paid what £8-11m for Chris Armstrong back in the day
mwg
Member
Registered: 19th Feb 04
Location: South Lakes
User status: Offline
25th Feb 11 at 13:52   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Nath
I can believe it. City have bought a team of £24m players where as United used to buy one a year.


Edited for you there. I'll see if I can find the article I saw about it. City were well ahead of everyone.
Robbo
Member
Registered: 6th Aug 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
25th Feb 11 at 13:53   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
Im gonna do a victor meldrew if thats true
Robbo
Member
Registered: 6th Aug 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
25th Feb 11 at 13:54   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
Maybe its this

http://paddytheflea.wordpress.com/2010/08/19/list-of-transfer-spending-wolves-are-12/

Which shows they are top of NET spending, but not spending overall
Robbo
Member
Registered: 6th Aug 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
25th Feb 11 at 13:55   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
Teams 92–2010 — Purchased – Net spending
1 Manchester C - £486,110,000 - £378,557,000
2 Chelsea - £563,340,000 - £371,465,000
3 Liverpool – £419,055,000 – £184,735,000
4 Tottenham – £383,550,000 – £182,832,500
5 Aston Villa – £253,240,000 – £142,015,000
6 Manchester U – £419,350,000 – £128,910,000
7 Newcastle – £306,695,000 – £108,470,000
8 Sunderland – £180,265,000 – £104,035,000
9 Birmingham C – £135,020,000 – £76,445,000
10 Fulham – £121,381,000 – £68,486,000
11 Everton – £217,245,500 – £54,975,500

12 Wolves – £84,919,000 – £45,874,000

13 Arsenal – £273,440,000 – £35,866,000
14 West Brom – £84,380,000 – £32,012,499

15 Stoke City – £49,140,000 – £26,610,000

16 Bolton – £84,470,000 – £19,700,000
17 Blackburn R – £182,662,000 – £6,527,000
18 Wigan – £80,365,000 – £4,472,500
19 Blackpool – £3,327,500 + £1,457,500
20 West Ham – £179,082,000 + £3,900,000 -

Amazing
Robbo
Member
Registered: 6th Aug 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
25th Feb 11 at 13:56   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
Arsenal, net spend of £36m

Yids, net spend £183m Total spend £100m more than us
mwg
Member
Registered: 19th Feb 04
Location: South Lakes
User status: Offline
25th Feb 11 at 13:57   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
Not seen that site before but that looks like it. See it is quite a bit more than United. And 2nd only to Chelsea in overall spend.
Robbo
Member
Registered: 6th Aug 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
25th Feb 11 at 13:58   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
i am still shocked that thye could possibly have spent that much so quickly compared to utd/liverpool/chelsea/spuds
mwg
Member
Registered: 19th Feb 04
Location: South Lakes
User status: Offline
25th Feb 11 at 13:59   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
Doesn't say when in 2010 that's up till either. Both City and Chelsea have spent a bit in January this year as well.
mwg
Member
Registered: 19th Feb 04
Location: South Lakes
User status: Offline
25th Feb 11 at 14:03   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Robbo
i am still shocked that thye could possibly have spent that much so quickly compared to utd/liverpool/chelsea/spuds


How many big money signings have Man United made though?

Rooney
Berbatov
Ferdinand
Veron

Probably some others but spread out over a number of years. The best players were (relatively) cheap. i.e. Ronaldo or came up through the ranks.
Ben D
Member
Registered: 25th Apr 05
Location: South West
User status: Offline
25th Feb 11 at 14:05   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
That's impressive by Arsenal, they will probably get it into 'Minus'' in the summer when they lose Cesc.
Ben D
Member
Registered: 25th Apr 05
Location: South West
User status: Offline
25th Feb 11 at 14:06   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
Van Nistlerooy was expensive at the time, £18M too MWG
Robbo
Member
Registered: 6th Aug 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
25th Feb 11 at 14:15   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by mwg
quote:
Originally posted by Robbo
i am still shocked that thye could possibly have spent that much so quickly compared to utd/liverpool/chelsea/spuds


How many big money signings have Man United made though?

Rooney
Berbatov
Ferdinand
Veron

Probably some others but spread out over a number of years. The best players were (relatively) cheap. i.e. Ronaldo or came up through the ranks.


A.Cole 7m
Rooney 30m
Veron 30m
Berbatov 30m
Ferdinand 30m
Carrick 15m
Valencia 16m
Hargreaves 20m
Nani/Anderson 30m ( )
Ronaldo 12m
Yorke 13m
Saha 12m
Stam 11m
RVP 20m
Evra/Vidic 15m
Bebe 8m
Smalling 10m
Taibi 4m
Smith 8m
Djemba-Djemba £4m
Kleberson £8m

(last few added for shits and gigs)

yes ive rounded a few up as dont knwo the precise amounts, shall i go on

[Edited on 25-02-2011 by Robbo]

  <<  1    2  >>
New Topic
New Poll

Corsa Sport » Message Board » Off Day » Sports Day » Manchester United is losing money and looking to be sold on? 23 database queries in 0.0135841 seconds