Steve
Premium Member
Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
|
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-25223631
|
Corsa_Sport21
Member
Registered: 13th Apr 08
Location: Leven, Fife. Drives : 205 GTi
User status: Offline
|
Old news.
Car dosn't need to be insured either now to get tax.
|
mwg
Member
Registered: 19th Feb 04
Location: South Lakes
User status: Offline
|
welcome to 2013
|
Steve
Premium Member
Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
|
Wasnt aware this had been implemented already, sorry if thats the case
|
fred7
Member
Registered: 17th May 04
Location: Rugeley, Staffordshire
User status: Offline
|
Didnt think this had started yet? Thought the system was still in development?
|
SVM 286
Member
Registered: 13th Feb 05
Location: pain
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Steve
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-25223631
Fucking. Cunts. 
|
A2H GO
Member
Registered: 14th Sep 04
Location: Stoke
User status: Offline
|
Mike on there makes a valid point...
"Why do we have a complex vehicle tax system anyway? If all tax was on the price of fuel it would automatically factor in engine size, transmission efficiency, miles driven, style of driving etc and would need no cameras or expensive admin to enforce payment."
And if you've not got fuel you can't use the car anyway unlike if you've not got tax.
|
Nismo
Member
Registered: 12th Sep 02
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by A2H GO
Mike on there makes a valid point...
"Why do we have a complex vehicle tax system anyway? If all tax was on the price of fuel it would automatically factor in engine size, transmission efficiency, miles driven, style of driving etc and would need no cameras or expensive admin to enforce payment."
And if you've not got fuel you can't use the car anyway unlike if you've not got tax.
 why haven't they thought of this, makes perfect sense
|
luciaadr
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 04
Location: Bexleyheath, Greater London
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by BBC
The changes are expected to come into effect in October 2014.
This was announced in December. Got the discs for a while yet.
They probably haven't moved it onto fuel because nobody would believe they've done it fairly, and like the bedroom tax (which isn't a tax!) you'd have every man and his dog kicking off that they've been disadvantaged somehow in their obscure situation, commuting 20,000 miles in an exempt camper van or something.
|
sc0ott
Member
Registered: 16th Feb 09
User status: Offline
|
My tax disc always used to warp.
|
pow
Premium Member
Registered: 11th Sep 06
Location: Hazlemere, Buckinghamshire
User status: Offline
|
Because there is enough tax on fuel as it is, let alone putting more on there. The disk is another way to scam us for more money
|
fred7
Member
Registered: 17th May 04
Location: Rugeley, Staffordshire
User status: Offline
|
Surely a disk/system is cheaper anyway than taxing fuel.
|
IvIarkgraham
Premium Member
Registered: 27th Mar 04
Location: Ellesmere Port, Cheshire
User status: Offline
|
didnt have my tax disc in my car last year, this years hasnt even been removed from the envelope
|
sc0ott
Member
Registered: 16th Feb 09
User status: Offline
|
Put the envelope in the tax disc holder.
|
taylorboosh
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 07
User status: Offline
|
Id save a fortune if it went on fuel
|
*CorsaCal*
Member
Registered: 3rd Oct 10
Location: Leicestershire Drives: 20XE Corsa
User status: Offline
|
My thought exactly
"On Twitter, presenter of BBC Radio 4's Money Box Paul Lewis wondered how prospective buyers of second-hand cars would know in future when the vehicle excise duty paid would expire."
|
Ian
Site Administrator
Registered: 28th Aug 99
Location: Liverpool
User status: Online
|
quote:
Originally posted by pow
Because there is enough tax on fuel as it is, let alone putting more on there.
WTF do your maths sir.
Astra would be cheaper TCO with a sensible rate on fuel.
Same for most occasional cars.
Hence why I would prefer it.
Had a debate with someone on Facebook a while back who was saying its a bad idea it would further incentivise fuel theft / duty evasion / other crimes which are more difficult to enforce than RFL evasion. Forget whose status now otherwise I'd link it, but he made some good points.
None of which are my problem btw. I'd well prefer it. In fact I'd even go so far as saying I'd be happy paying a bit more as it would give more freedom to swap between more cars. Obviously that's not a populous camp.
|
_Allan_
Member
Registered: 24th Mar 04
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by *CorsaCal*
My thought exactly
"On Twitter, presenter of BBC Radio 4's Money Box Paul Lewis wondered how prospective buyers of second-hand cars would know in future when the vehicle excise duty paid would expire."
You would go here and put in reg and manufacturer.
https://www.taxdisc.direct.gov.uk/EvlPortalApp/app/enquiry?execution=e1s2
Date of liability 
|
mwg
Member
Registered: 19th Feb 04
Location: South Lakes
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Ian
quote:
Originally posted by pow
Because there is enough tax on fuel as it is, let alone putting more on there.
WTF do your maths sir.
Astra would be cheaper TCO with a sensible rate on fuel.
Same for most occasional cars.
Hence why I would prefer it.
Had a debate with someone on Facebook a while back who was saying its a bad idea it would further incentivise fuel theft / duty evasion / other crimes which are more difficult to enforce than RFL evasion. Forget whose status now otherwise I'd link it, but he made some good points.
None of which are my problem btw. I'd well prefer it. In fact I'd even go so far as saying I'd be happy paying a bit more as it would give more freedom to swap between more cars. Obviously that's not a populous camp.
It'd all depend on by how much the cost of fuel went up. If it was a couple of pence I'd probably be the same as now, maybe slightly better off. If it was 20p+ a litre I'd be worse off over a year by a few hundred quid. So I wouldn't like to say I was all for it without knowing the figures.
|
pow
Premium Member
Registered: 11th Sep 06
Location: Hazlemere, Buckinghamshire
User status: Offline
|
I purposely bought a car that's lower tax though but I do a fair few miles so it wouldn't work in my favour, hence why I don't like it 
|
3CorsaMeal
Member
Registered: 11th Apr 02
User status: Offline
|
It will kill the richbrook alloy tax disc holder industry 
|
3CorsaMeal
Member
Registered: 11th Apr 02
User status: Offline
|
Also, if a tax disc isn't needed i guess it will be allowed to display one anyway, would be cool to be displaying a 1995 tax disc on my car, Could start a new trend.
|
Ben G
Member
Registered: 12th Jan 07
Location: Essex
User status: Offline
|
Its all about the magnetax nowadays 
|
mwg
Member
Registered: 19th Feb 04
Location: South Lakes
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by 3CorsaMeal
Also, if a tax disc isn't needed i guess it will be allowed to display one anyway, would be cool to be displaying a 1995 tax disc on my car, Could start a new trend.
old tax discs might be worth something in a few years when everyone's got rid of them. I threw my old one on the fire the other day
|
SVM 286
Member
Registered: 13th Feb 05
Location: pain
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by fred7
Surely a disk/system is cheaper anyway than taxing fuel.
...than taxing fuel any further than the unfair and inflated duty AND VAT that's already on it
|
