corsasport.co.uk
 

Corsa Sport » Message Board » Off Day » Geek Day » Plasma vs LCD


New Topic

New Poll
  <<  1    2  >> Subscribe | Add to Favourites

You are not logged in and may not post or reply to messages. Please log in or create a new account or mail us about fixing an existing one - register@corsasport.co.uk

There are also many more features available when you are logged in such as private messages, buddy list, location services, post search and more.


Author Plasma vs LCD
Dom
Member

Registered: 13th Sep 03
User status: Offline
2nd Nov 06 at 02:51   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by corsa-sxi
i heard plasmas need to be recharged after a few years? also i love the look of the philips ambilight 42", saw it in curry's the other day, picture was just so sharp and detailed


heard wrong mate and wtf were you doing in currys looking at TVs? they couldn't show off a decent picture if they tried

Like said, development on plasma screens are still happening, just as they are on LCD - hence why they are slowly catching up to plasmas on the constrast ratio. But its also a reason why there are 1080p plasmas

Eitherway, as its pretty difficult to capture 1080p let alone watch it (and isn't bandwidth near twice that of 1080i?) and the cost involved to do both of these, i wouldn't worry about it for the next few years.

Anyways, its a sore subject between the two different camps - and majority of people jump on bandwagons without knowing the technical reasons behind both types of screens (and the variations), so like said search around here, do a google and read some propper AV forums or LCD/Plasma sites
Jamie Walby
Member

Registered: 15th Nov 04
User status: Offline
2nd Nov 06 at 09:15   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by --Dave--
Sony James, Sony.


Do you mean Jamie
--Dave--
Banned

Registered: 17th Feb 04
Location: Essssseeeeex Drives: Black Supra TT
User status: Offline
2nd Nov 06 at 09:40   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Yes Jamie I'm sorry.

As Dom said really, both have their advantages/disadvantages etc. Best thing to to is get onto AV Forums check out the numerous threads on the Tv's you're interested in. whole wealth of info on there.
Jamie Walby
Member

Registered: 15th Nov 04
User status: Offline
2nd Nov 06 at 11:31   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

I have watched both an LCD and a Plasma, if im honest, I couldnt tell the difference. Dont know if the plasma wasnt set up properly?!?!
--Dave--
Banned

Registered: 17th Feb 04
Location: Essssseeeeex Drives: Black Supra TT
User status: Offline
2nd Nov 06 at 11:43   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

imo it's useless trying to compare the two. LCDs are notorious for being too dark and this is something plasmas are better at. Saying that LCDs are catching up in that area.

Screen burn is an issue with some plasmas, but it's not as big an issue as many make out. LCDs don't suffer from this.

As always, its a case of you get what you pay for. If you go for something like a Bravia then you can expect things like contrast levels and viewing angles to be good. If you go for a cheap LCD then these details can let it down. Same with a plasma.
Scoty B
Member

Registered: 14th Feb 06
Location: East Kilbride, Glasgow 1873
User status: Offline
2nd Nov 06 at 13:32   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by --Dave--
wonder why 42" of Plasma is £800 cheaper than a 40" LCD??


Production cost not quality. LCDs over 40" require 2 boards which is why they are so damn expensive.
John
Member

Registered: 30th Jun 03
User status: Offline
2nd Nov 06 at 14:37   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

What a lot of rubbish.
An 800 quid 42" plasma is 800 quid because its shit.
--Dave--
Banned

Registered: 17th Feb 04
Location: Essssseeeeex Drives: Black Supra TT
User status: Offline
2nd Nov 06 at 14:47   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Scoty - you have come out with some funny posts during your time on here, this takes the cake though

Dom
Member

Registered: 13th Sep 03
User status: Offline
2nd Nov 06 at 18:00   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by John
What a lot of rubbish.
An 800 quid 42" plasma is 800 quid because its shit.




Usually you'll find that plasmas do blacks, LCDs do grays (there improving) - its about the only major difference you can spot, especially in a dark room, a black screen on the LCD is like a sore thumb.

And like said, 32" or below is probably LCD territory with cost in mind, above 32" you need to look at plasmas as there cheaper than LCD at those sizes.

eitherway, this has all been covered numerous times, so have a look on www.avforums.com - its a good starting point
Scoty B
Member

Registered: 14th Feb 06
Location: East Kilbride, Glasgow 1873
User status: Offline
3rd Nov 06 at 14:07   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

quote:
Originally posted by John
What a lot of rubbish.
An 800 quid 42" plasma is 800 quid because its shit.


We aren't on about an £800 plasma.
John
Member

Registered: 30th Jun 03
User status: Offline
3rd Nov 06 at 14:14   View User's Profile U2U Member Reply With Quote

Can you read

And you were talking rubbish anyway, same as most of the things you post.

  <<  1    2  >>
New Topic

New Poll

  Related Threads Author Forum Replies Views Last Post
Plasmas antonOO2 Geek Day 25 2920
31st Jan 05 at 01:08
by Cybermonkey
 
PLASMA OR LCD TV??? TurboChris Geek Day 21 1635
14th Jul 05 at 18:12
by mattyboy199
 
PLASMA VS LCD carnoisseurcraig Geek Day 16 1490
19th Mar 06 at 15:47
by Dom
 
Sony Bravia LCDs --Dave-- Geek Day 31 2218
25th Jun 06 at 20:59
by Welsh Dan
 

Corsa Sport » Message Board » Off Day » Geek Day » Plasma vs LCD 29 database queries in 0.0363400 seconds