eastend
Member
Registered: 13th Mar 07
Location: Taunton, Somerset
User status: Offline
|
Anyone on here that has driven one?
What are they like? driveability? how do they compare with the c20xe for aceleration?
Looking at something along the lines of this spec on the x16xe.
Mantzle Inlet
Janspeed 4-2-1
Newman 264 Cams
Dbilas Vernier Pullies
BMC CDA Induction Kit
Decat
Ported And Polished Head
Dastek Unichip (remap) With 7500rpm Limit
The reason i ask is this is the spec i am currently working towards and just want to know how it would perform as i know theres not many that tune 1.6's in this way as the 2.0 litre or throttle bodies is the preferred way?
thanks
|
Dean_W
Member
Registered: 13th Dec 05
Location: Downham Market, Norfolk
User status: Offline
|
It wouldn't have the torque unless set up very well i suppose.
Plus theres no replacement for displacement
Mine was 132 on dodgy rollers, and it drove ok, bit difference with an xe though.
But, everyone has a preference.
|
eastend
Member
Registered: 13th Mar 07
Location: Taunton, Somerset
User status: Offline
|
yea i think mine is currently around 120/125bhp, but that is guessing as it hasnt been on the rollers yet.
Spec it currently has is
Mantzle inlet
Janspeed 4-2-1
BMC CDA
Decat
Superchip - raised limit to 7000rpm.
just wondering what the performance will be like with the adding of, cams, proper map and headwork etc
would it be able to stay with a 2litre corsa?
|
Dean_W
Member
Registered: 13th Dec 05
Location: Downham Market, Norfolk
User status: Offline
|
It'd make a hell of a difference, especially if it's mapped properly and the cams dialled in.
I reckon a 150BHP 1.6 wouldn't keep with a 150BHP 2.0. Displacement would pull it through i reckon.
|
eastend
Member
Registered: 13th Mar 07
Location: Taunton, Somerset
User status: Offline
|
yea it would be all set up correctly by the mappers from a dastek dealer
and the cams will be dialled in to there optimum, so will look forward to it being done
i know getting torque out of the small block is a bit of a problem?
do you have a rough idea of the sort of torque figure that would be produced from the final spec on the x16xe?
[Edited on 18-03-2008 by eastend]
|
Dean_W
Member
Registered: 13th Dec 05
Location: Downham Market, Norfolk
User status: Offline
|
I'm not sure with mapping and stuff, but mine only gained about 2ft/lb.
That spec was mantzel, headwork, high torque cams (yeah right), manifold and de-cat.
Standard cam timing and ECU.
|
eastend
Member
Registered: 13th Mar 07
Location: Taunton, Somerset
User status: Offline
|
thats interesting, you say dodgy rollers what did you personally belive it to be (bhp wise)?
do you think 150bhp is achieveable with the above spec?
[Edited on 18-03-2008 by eastend]
|
Dean_W
Member
Registered: 13th Dec 05
Location: Downham Market, Norfolk
User status: Offline
|
Yes, i'd say so. Dependant on cams and mapping.
With a similar spec to that Monster is wanting 150BHP, but i'm sure his has been bored out to a 1.7.
|
Stu_22
Member
Registered: 25th Mar 02
Location: Luton
User status: Offline
|
but for all the bits(cams, headwork, uni chip, mantzel) your have big chunk of what throttle bodies will cost.
I have 140bhp with just the throttle bodies on a standard 1.6
|
Ash_EP3
Member
Registered: 15th May 07
Location: Melksham, Wiltshire
User status: Offline
|
I have seen that you can get 140+bhp with just
- Cat-back
- Inlet Manifold
- Enclosed Induction kit
So yea I'd say that you can get 150 easily with that setup, not sure about how it would compare to a redtop tho
|
Dean_W
Member
Registered: 13th Dec 05
Location: Downham Market, Norfolk
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by S214_UPP
I have seen that you can get 140+bhp with just
- Cat-back
- Inlet Manifold
- Enclosed Induction kit
I disagree.
|
Scotty C
Member
Registered: 6th Nov 05
Location: Kidderminster Drives: 1.6 16v Sport
User status: Offline
|
My old sport was 130bhp ish and it kept with a standard valver Corsa to 80mph (had a 1.4 exhaust though)
Had a play with a valver Nova too, but I did come out of corner quicker so sat with him until we hit 4th, then he pulled away, only very slowly though.
This is why I tune 1.6's becuase the attention they get when you keep with these bigger engined cars
[Edited on 18-03-2008 by Monster]
|
Scotty C
Member
Registered: 6th Nov 05
Location: Kidderminster Drives: 1.6 16v Sport
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by eastend
thats interesting, you say dodgy rollers what did you personally belive it to be (bhp wise)?
do you think 150bhp is achieveable with the above spec?
[Edited on 18-03-2008 by eastend]
Yes. Thats EXCATLY the same as I'm aiming for (apart from mine is 1648cc) Get the C16XE head though, they have bigger ports, and generally a better head design.
[Edited on 18-03-2008 by Monster]
|
Hamish
Member
Registered: 4th Apr 05
Location: Ashtead, Surrey Drives: 100bhp Mint with Hole
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by S214_UPP
I have seen that you can get 140+bhp with just
- Cat-back
- Inlet Manifold
- Enclosed Induction kit
So yea I'd say that you can get 150 easily with that setup, not sure about how it would compare to a redtop tho
sorry but
|
gavin18787
Premium Member
Registered: 22nd Feb 05
Location: Basildon, Essex
User status: Offline
|
I can keep with a 2.0 corsa to about 70ish
However this relies on me been in the power band all the time. would get destroyed by an xe if it was from a rolling start etc
Drives supercharged Tec with torque
|
csweatherston
Member
Registered: 16th Jan 06
Location: Devon
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Monster
quote: Originally posted by eastend
thats interesting, you say dodgy rollers what did you personally belive it to be (bhp wise)?
do you think 150bhp is achieveable with the above spec?
Yes. Thats EXCATLY the same as I'm aiming for (apart from mine is 1648cc) Get the C16XE head though, they have bigger ports, and generally a better head design.
it depends on the casting number...
the best head to search for is one with cloverleaf shaped ports...
ive seen 10+bhp added to a standard x16 by using this head
|
Vaux Lad
Member
Registered: 15th Dec 04
Location: Stoke-on-Trent
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by S214_UPP
- Cat-back
- Inlet Manifold
- Enclosed Induction kit
That would give 120bhp on a good day.
A 150hp 2L 16v would be quicker than a 150bhp 1.6 16v.
|
csweatherston
Member
Registered: 16th Jan 06
Location: Devon
User status: Offline
|
^^^ it depends how the 150bhp is used...
if you have a 1.6 capable of 180bhp, mapped to give a good 150hp with a nice smooth torque figure, it will be quicker
|
Steve X16XE
Member
Registered: 31st Dec 06
Location: Barnsley, South Yorkshire
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Vaux Lad
quote: Originally posted by S214_UPP
- Cat-back
- Inlet Manifold
- Enclosed Induction kit
That would give 120bhp on a good day.
125.2 bhp with full exhaust done, mantzel and k&n panel filter.
|
Steve X16XE
Member
Registered: 31st Dec 06
Location: Barnsley, South Yorkshire
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Vaux Lad
A 150hp 2L 16v would be quicker than a 150bhp 1.6 16v.
Round a track? Not a chance
|
RCS
Member
Registered: 26th Jan 05
Location: Lichfield/Dundee
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by csweatherston
quote: Originally posted by Monster
quote: Originally posted by eastend
thats interesting, you say dodgy rollers what did you personally belive it to be (bhp wise)?
do you think 150bhp is achieveable with the above spec?
Yes. Thats EXCATLY the same as I'm aiming for (apart from mine is 1648cc) Get the C16XE head though, they have bigger ports, and generally a better head design.
it depends on the casting number...
the best head to search for is one with cloverleaf shaped ports...
ive seen 10+bhp added to a standard x16 by using this head
C16XE head gives a higher compression ratio, which is why it performs slightly better.
|
Richardhhha
Member
Registered: 29th Sep 07
Location: Croydon, Greater London
User status: Offline
|
c20xe corsa round a track would get trounced by a 150bhp c16xe mainly because the c20xe is soo much heavyer and will not hold as tight a line or the same corner speed as a c16xe, if you want one to keep up with a xe'd corsa then get yourself a lightened flywheel and a different final drive, dave a did this and said it became quite hairy with such a quick reving engine or words to that effect..... get a flywheel and final drive, and you wont be disapointed
|
Vaux Lad
Member
Registered: 15th Dec 04
Location: Stoke-on-Trent
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Richardhhha
c20xe corsa round a track would get trounced by a 150bhp c16xe mainly because the c20xe is soo much heavyer and will not hold as tight a line or the same corner speed as a c16xe, if you want one to keep up with a xe'd corsa then get yourself a lightened flywheel and a different final drive, dave a did this and said it became quite hairy with such a quick reving engine or words to that effect..... get a flywheel and final drive, and you wont be disapointed
I wouldn't put money on it tbh!
Maybe if the xe was on Gmax suspension yeah
|
Steve X16XE
Member
Registered: 31st Dec 06
Location: Barnsley, South Yorkshire
User status: Offline
|
Mr Vsport also said that apart from his TB's, that final drive mod is the best thing he's done to that car.
Guess what i'm looking out for in the scrappers...... F13CR and an F10 box with a 4.18FD
|
eastend
Member
Registered: 13th Mar 07
Location: Taunton, Somerset
User status: Offline
|
i know that changing the final drive it affects top end performance as in top speed, but have never known by how much?
is it a big decrease on top end or minimal?
[Edited on 18-03-2008 by eastend]
|