John
Member
Registered: 30th Jun 03
User status: Offline
|
I can vouch that steve does infact know what p and i are.
|
BarnshaW
Member
Registered: 25th Oct 06
User status: Offline
|
lol, its not steve.... its really not lol
|
Steve
Premium Member
Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by John
I can vouch that steve does infact know what p and i are.
yes what i just said
|
John
Member
Registered: 30th Jun 03
User status: Offline
|
Yip
|
BarnshaW
Member
Registered: 25th Oct 06
User status: Offline
|
u lot are just having a wind up. lol
|
Steve
Premium Member
Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
|
obvious isnt it, it scan 10 particles up and 80 particles across
|
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
|
I'm confuzzled
|
BarnshaW
Member
Registered: 25th Oct 06
User status: Offline
|
yes steve. you really shud be a comedian... ur as funny as cancer at christmas
|
John
Member
Registered: 30th Jun 03
User status: Offline
|
And integrated does 1 particle at a time instead.
What was his name btw?
I've not seen him post since.
[Edited on 29-12-2007 by John]
|
Steve
Premium Member
Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
|
nar integrated is one pixel across and 1 pixel down
|
Steve
Premium Member
Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by John
And integrated does 1 particle at a time instead.
What was his name btw?
I've not seen him post since.
[Edited on 29-12-2007 by John]
it was some randomer i think
|
Steve
Premium Member
Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
|
tiesto, was that in his name?
|
Steve
Premium Member
Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
|
16vKarlos
quote: Originally posted by 16vKarlos
I Work For Comet + For The Money You Have To Spend I Would Say For A 1080p Screen This Is A Good Price.
Just So you have Some Idea
Contrast Ratio - 5000-1 Means 5000 Different Shades Of One Color Going Accros The Screen To Make Up The Picture In Its Best Definition........ On Average For A 1080p Screen You Will See Most Are Around 5000 to 12000
Pixel Resolution - 1080i Itigrated + 1080p Progressive - The Best One To Go For Would Be The Progressive.
The Integrated Just Means That The Pixels Move In A Ratio Of Across One Pixel + Down By One Pixel + This Will Take more Time For The Picture To Evolve Properly.
The Progressive Is Basically Opposite, Starting From One Corner The Ration Moves Across The Screen In A Constant Rate Down The Scren In A Constant Rate + Also Diagonally Down The Screen Producing The Image Faster, While Also Making The Picture Sharper + Brighter.
These are The Two Main Things To Look For, 1080p + A High Contrast Ratio
I Hope This Helps Seth
All The Best, Karlos
http://www.corsasport.co.uk/board/viewthread.php?tid=399294
|
John
Member
Registered: 30th Jun 03
User status: Offline
|
He worked in comet anyway so knew what he was talking about.
|
Steve
Premium Member
Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
|
^^^
|
John
Member
Registered: 30th Jun 03
User status: Offline
|
I can just imagine him explaining that to a customer.
|
BarnshaW
Member
Registered: 25th Oct 06
User status: Offline
|
pmsl, he did try. prolly a lovely lad tbh
|
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
|
Why Does Every Word Start With A Capital Letter?
|
John
Member
Registered: 30th Jun 03
User status: Offline
|
Do you think he'd have emphasised the 1st letter of every word when speaking?
He's only 17, I thought the kids were up on this stuff these days
[Edited on 29-12-2007 by John]
|
Dom
Member
Registered: 13th Sep 03
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Steve
some people
yes i know what i and p means
DOM - http://www.flattvpeople.com/tutorials/lcd-vs-plasma.asp
Viewing Angle Up to 160° Up to 175° LCD TVs have the advantage here, but by a small margin. Your viewing experience is not going to be ideal at 160 or 175 degree angles. LCD TVs used to have a problem in this area, primarily because LCDs were originally used as single person computer monitors.
STEVE - from http://www.lcdtvbuyingguide.com/lcdtv-plasmavslcd.shtml
quote:
VIEWING ANGLES
Plasma manufacturers have made much of their 160° viewing angles, which is about as good as horizontal and vertical viewing angles get. This owes to the fact that each pixel produces its own light, rather than light being spread across the screen from one central source. Hence, each pixel is more readily visible because its brightness is consistent with every other pixel on the screen. One consistent area of superiority of plasma viewing angles is demonstrated when viewing dark material content, especially DVDs. A Plasma display holds the black levels from off axis, while LCD TVs lose black level intensity more as the angle off axis increases. This usually occurs after around 90 degrees.
LCD TV manufacturers have done much to improve their displays' viewing angles. The substrate material on newer-generation LCD models by Sharp and Sony has helped to expand those units' viewing angles, though they still have some ground to cover before catching plasma. Expect the best LCD HDTVs to have between 120 and 130 degree viewing angles.
ADVANTAGE: Plasma
Steve - from http://www.practical-home-theater-guide.com/plasma-vs-lcd-1.html
quote:
Plasma vs LCD: Viewing-angle
We continue our discussion on plasma vs LCD technology by looking at how picture quality behaves with a change in viewing angle.
The viewing angle represents how far one can sit on either side of the screen away from the center, without experiencing significant deterioration in picture quality – mainly because of color shifts and reduced contrast.
Plasma televisions typically have a better viewing angle than LCD TVs. Plasma televisions holds the black levels from off-axis, while LCDs lose black level intensity more as the off-axis angle increases. This usually occurs at around 100 degrees, i.e. at some 50 degrees on either side of a line drawn normal to the center of the screen.
The main reason for this difference between these two technologies arise out of the fact that each pixel in a plasma display panel produces its own light, rather than light being spread across the screen from one central backlight source. Hence, each pixel is more readily visible because its brightness is consistent with every other pixel on the screen.
shall i continue?
[Edited on 29-12-2007 by Dom]
|
Steve
Premium Member
Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
|
please do
|
John
Member
Registered: 30th Jun 03
User status: Offline
|
Manufacturers have either already stopped or are moving to stop plasma production, thats good enough reason for me not to buy one.
|
Steve
Premium Member
Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
|
isnt it because the glass screens cost too much to make?
|
John
Member
Registered: 30th Jun 03
User status: Offline
|
I'd be lying if I said I knew the reason, if you buy a plasma you'll soon have a piece of history though.
|
Dom
Member
Registered: 13th Sep 03
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by John
Manufacturers have either already stopped or are moving to stop plasma production, thats good enough reason for me not to buy one.
Not sure were you've heard that, as samsung are working on a 100" plasma and sony are releasing a 70" plasma. Advances in plasma technology are pretty slow compared to LCD and the technology is getting a little old, but i don't think manufacturers are ready to give up plasma just yet.
I think we're a good few years away yet from plasma disappearing, especially as oled and laser screens are miles away from being even remotely affordable.
|