Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
|
PANASONIC TX32LXD52:
http://www.comet.co.uk/comet/html/cache/455_281565.html
Pro's:
RGB connection
Built in freeview
3 scarts
5 star picture rating (What Video and Widescreen TV magazine)
HDMi
Con's:
Doesnt look that good close up
More expensive (£999)
Lower contrast ratio (800:1)
LG 32LX2R
http://www.comet.co.uk/comet/html/cache/455_263710.html
Pro's:
Looks fantastic close up
Cheaper (£876)
5 star connectivity rating (What Video and Widescreen TV magazine)
Higher contrast ratio (1200:1)
Decent brightness figure (500cd/m2)
HDMi
Picture in picture
Con's:
No RGB connection
Less scarts
No Freeview
Only 4 star pictue rating (What Video and Widescreen TV magazine)
I'm swaying towards the LG as its cheaper, not really that inferior, and looks so much nicer than the Panasonic. Also to me the picture looked better than the Panasonic.
Vote away 
|
Robbo
Member
Registered: 6th Aug 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
LG personally
|
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Robbo
LG personally
I'm thinking the same but thought as its a big expensive purchase i'd get more opinions.
|
Tiesto
Member
Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: Hinckley, Leicestershire
User status: Offline
|
http://www.digitaldirectuk.com/products_moreinfo3/index.asp?product_id=8176
Sharp LC-32GA6E
Apparently picture looks as good or better than the Panny. And looks nicer imo.
|
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
|
 Good find, will consider that too as its a bargain.
|
John
Member
Registered: 30th Jun 03
User status: Offline
|
The LG is amazing.
Although the magazine says the pany is better I thought the LG had a far superior picture, maybe down to personal preference though.
|
Nath
Member
Registered: 3rd Apr 02
Location: MK
User status: Offline
|
I'm with you on that John, looked better in real life for sure. Will look at the Sharp but i'm fairly certain i'll opt for the LG.
|
