Kurt
Member
Registered: 23rd Oct 05
Location: Hi
User status: Offline
|
http://www.onlive.com/
So i was watching something earlier when they showed this new way of gaming..
Essentially there are 1000's of servers running the game at its best performance and you rent or buy the games but dont actually download them... Theyre streamed to you.. so pretty much what you have is a streamed video that you control
will be compatible with mac, pc or you can have a hardware box and controller for use with telly
Sounds pretty intresting if it works.. lag will be a major issue though
[Edited on 04-04-2009 by Kurt]
|
Jambo
Member
Registered: 8th Sep 01
Location: Maidenhead, Drives: VXR Arctic
User status: Offline
|
i heard of this the other day, sounds good 
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
What sort of net connection do you need though?!
|
Kurt
Member
Registered: 23rd Oct 05
Location: Hi
User status: Offline
|
it just says broadband
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
put it this way, that video on their site is lagging with my connection - so Im betting any game would be fucking awful.
Great idea, and Im sure it'll work great to people with decent connections, but for the rest of the UK it wont be any good.
|
_Allan_
Member
Registered: 24th Mar 04
User status: Offline
|
Seems to be US based only for now anyway.
|
Paul_J
Member
Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
Interesting concept...
so i'm assuming it almost works like a remote desktop connection...
Essentially video of the game is streamed to your pc / monitor... and you send key press / button presses back to them...
Therefore, all the action is actually happening on their pc / server... and you're essentially just watching a live 'feed' of the action, but able to also control it.
would be interesting to see how much lag you'd get? plus the quality would be pants on a crap connection.
|
Paul_J
Member
Registered: 6th Jun 02
Location: London
User status: Offline
|
ahhh...
quote:
For Standard-Definition TV resolution, OnLive needs a 1.5 Mbps connection. For HDTV resolution (720p60), OnLive needs 5 Mbps.
I was gonna say.
|
John
Member
Registered: 30th Jun 03
User status: Offline
|
It's not sustainable just now.
Getting an uninterupted 1.5meg connection is a challenge, and how much bandwidth will they be needing to supply it at that.
Destined to never get off the ground imo.
|
Russ
Member
Registered: 14th Mar 04
Location: Armchair
User status: Offline
|
bandwidth 
|
Deadude
Member
Registered: 30th Jun 07
Location: Spondon, Derby
User status: Offline
|
who run at a res lower than 1024x768 now though cant see it being any good unless you have 12mbps+ connection for any decent res and your still looking at a minimum of 60ms lag time just from the hops if its hosted in the UK
|
Bart
Member
Registered: 19th Aug 02
Location: Midsomer Norton, Bristol Avon
User status: Offline
|
^^ agreed.
Its a great concept, but I cant see it being hugely popular.
|
Ian
Site Administrator
Registered: 28th Aug 99
Location: Liverpool
User status: Online
|
It's almost a backwards step. Increasing the concurrent hardware load while decreasing the rate at which it can be displayed.
|
Cosmo
Member
Registered: 29th Mar 01
Location: Im the real one!
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by Ian
It's almost a backwards step. Increasing the concurrent hardware load while decreasing the rate at which it can be displayed.
I dont know if its a backwards step, as a lot of things are moving to a 'cloud' computing type of thing - I just think its a forward step thats being taken too soon when the hardware/bandwidth just isnt there.
I can only see this taking off where decent net connections are a standard, and thats just not here.
|
FruitBooTeR
Member
Registered: 18th Jan 07
Location: Wolverhampton Drives: S15
User status: Offline
|
Bump
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8556874.stm
Doesnt say when its launching in the UK though..
|
Kyle T
Premium Member
Registered: 11th Sep 04
Location: Selby, North Yorkshire
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by John
It's not sustainable just now.
Perhaps in this country, where most of us are bottlenecked by BT and their 40 year old copper 
I've got friends on ze mainland (holland, denmark and sweden) with connections I can only dream of - and 24 hour max downtime in the event of a failure. It's ridiculous compared to the crap we're stuck with.
The internet is capable of this, and so much more - if the infrastructure of the world catches up a bit 
Lotus Elise 111R
Impreza WRX STi
|
Ian
Site Administrator
Registered: 28th Aug 99
Location: Liverpool
User status: Online
|
Infrastructure aside, I don't even like the model.
Why you would centralise hardware load I don't know.
Current arrangement means that gamers foot the bill for hardware. New arrangement means the service provider must do.
Unless there's an economy of scale in all those £9.99s buying better hardware at the other end. Suppose it is potentially a better use of processor cycles if you internationalise the audience and they have to sleep some time.
|
John
Member
Registered: 30th Jun 03
User status: Offline
|
It's still destined to be a massive flop.
|
DC90
Member
Registered: 14th Nov 07
Location: Bedfordshire
User status: Offline
|
Modem speed wouldn't be a problem for a lot of people as it is constantly getting bigger and cheaper. For example, Virgin are looking to get 200mb out by the end of 2010.
Really can't see this idea taking off at all, though.
|
