Stu_22
Member
Registered: 25th Mar 02
Location: Luton
User status: Offline
|
Car getting mapped today so next step getting it throught the MOT emisions.
With the SBD manifold it doesnt leave me with a lot of room. So I was thinking of welding say three cats together and making it fit as a back box also making it easier to swap.
The only thing is I know cats like to be as close to the manifold to work best but will three be ok at the back
|
Dean_W
Member
Registered: 13th Dec 05
Location: Downham Market, Norfolk
User status: Offline
|
Why don't you fabricate a middle section with a cat welded in?
|
James R
Member
Registered: 4th Feb 03
Location: 205GTi16/306GTi16
User status: Offline
|
Why don't you just declare the eniginer removed form a J-reg nova or older, and then it's tested as a non-cat test?
|
Dean_W
Member
Registered: 13th Dec 05
Location: Downham Market, Norfolk
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by James R
Why don't you just declare the eniginer removed form a J-reg nova or older, and then it's tested as a non-cat test?
Depends what the engine is.
|
Stu_22
Member
Registered: 25th Mar 02
Location: Luton
User status: Offline
|
quote:
Originally posted by James R
Why don't you just declare the eniginer removed form a J-reg nova or older, and then it's tested as a non-cat test?
What happens when he says prove it.
Dont want to butcher up middle section
|
James R
Member
Registered: 4th Feb 03
Location: 205GTi16/306GTi16
User status: Offline
|
Kindley produce an invoice of Engine code blah blah, taken from *make up a reg of a nova*
amount etc... as proof.
The fact it's on TB's etc.. means it's not std so you can get away with it, just BS it, was an developemtn engine for lotus blah blah.
Done.
|
Stu_22
Member
Registered: 25th Mar 02
Location: Luton
User status: Offline
|
I'll see if the mapping place will do me a invoce saying they bult up this "nova" engine.
Then when I take it for the MOT should I sort this out straight away before he starts
|
