Jambo
Member
Registered: 8th Sep 01
Location: Maidenhead, Drives: VXR Arctic
User status: Offline
|
Bloke i know doesnt beleive that there are scramjets powered by hydregeon motor's capable of (unmanned) 5000mph or mach 7.
I was under the impression and im sure i read correctly that speed of sound (760mph) is equivilant to Mach 1 or thereabouts...
He is adament its mach4, which sounds like codswallop to me? Surely most jets are capable of around mach 2 as an average?
Can spacemonkeh or others please help.....
|
Whittie
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 06
Location: North Wales Drives: BMW, Corsa & Fiat
User status: Offline
|
http://www.globalaircraft.org/qboard.htm
|
Steve
Premium Member
Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
|
what he thinks the speed of sound is mach 4? thats rubbish
|
Dean_W
Member
Registered: 13th Dec 05
Location: Downham Market, Norfolk
User status: Offline
|
A Mach is the speed of sound. i.e. Mach 2 = twice the speed of sound.
Sounds like this dude knows not much. Tell him to go watch discovery wings for a bit
|
Jambo
Member
Registered: 8th Sep 01
Location: Maidenhead, Drives: VXR Arctic
User status: Offline
|
Thought i wasnt mad. mach4 pish.
Thanks chaps
|
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
|
mach 1 is the speed of sound in any given medium. Through air at 20 degrees celsius, the speed of an object breaking the sound barrier is 765mph. Currently, Scramjets are the most efficient engine designs to carry an aircraft/rocket at hypersonic speed.
However, these are unmanned. the fastest an aircraft has travelled within the atmosphere is mach 6.7 in a North American X15.
The Saturn V rocket was capable of hitting 30,000kmh
|
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
|
AMERICA, FUCK YEAH
|
Whittie
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 06
Location: North Wales Drives: BMW, Corsa & Fiat
User status: Offline
|
Apollo 10 nearly went 40,000 km/h ( 25,000 mph )
[Edited on 02-01-2007 by Whittie]
|
Whittie
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 06
Location: North Wales Drives: BMW, Corsa & Fiat
User status: Offline
|
39,897 km/h
24,790 mph
|
Steve
Premium Member
Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Cybermonkey
AMERICA, FUCK YEAH
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ac/Apollo_11_launch.jpg
is that flag shopped in? thats cheesy as fuck
|
Jambo
Member
Registered: 8th Sep 01
Location: Maidenhead, Drives: VXR Arctic
User status: Offline
|
id heard of an x15, you ever seen it? Its a fucking rocket with a seat Awesome
Bloke has been told, he can GTF Blackbird is only mach 3 and thats at 100,000ft. Thinner air?
|
Whittie
Member
Registered: 11th Aug 06
Location: North Wales Drives: BMW, Corsa & Fiat
User status: Offline
|
Fastest combat jet tracked at about Mach 3.2 ( 2,110 mph )
|
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
|
Mig31 Foxhound is capable of speeds in excess of mach3, but typically mach2.8. the SR71 Blackbird was a reconnaisance aircraft, not a combat aircraft, and capable of sustained mach3.3 in flight at 80,000ft.
|
Dean_W
Member
Registered: 13th Dec 05
Location: Downham Market, Norfolk
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Cybermonkey
the fastest an aircraft has travelled within the atmosphere is mach 6.7 in a North American X15.
Bit of useless knowledge - The fastest recorded speed hit within the atmosphere was a speed of Mach 8.5 (6,416 mph). This was achieved by a four-stage rocket sled at Holloman Air Force Base on April 30, 2003. Basically a rocket on a train track. Albeit slightly smaller.
|
Steve
Premium Member
Registered: 30th Mar 02
Location: Worcestershire Drives: Defender
User status: Offline
|
that was on reee ree ree reecord breakers. re re record breakeerrrs
|
Mad Moe
Member
Registered: 14th Jun 01
Location: Northumberland
User status: Offline
|
quote: Originally posted by Cybermonkey
Mig31 Foxhound is capable of speeds in excess of mach3, but typically mach2.8. the SR71 Blackbird was a reconnaisance aircraft, not a combat aircraft, and capable of sustained mach3.3 in flight at 80,000ft.
Is it not the Mig 25 Foxbat that is capable of speeds in excess of Mach 3? I've never heard of the Mig 31 at those speeds
|
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
|
the MIG25 could not sustain Mach3+ flight without the engines overheating and destroying themselves. even approaching 2.8 was difficult for the 25. the 31 is superior in terms of speed, hence why it was its successor
|
Russ
Member
Registered: 14th Mar 04
Location: Armchair
User status: Offline
|
i was under the impression that the "official" figure for the blackbirds top speed was very conservative
|
Cybermonkey
Member
Registered: 22nd Sep 02
Location: Sydney, Australia
User status: Offline
|
SR71 had a maximum sustained speed of mach3.3. it could not exceed this by any great amount, as the P&W's would start to suffer from heat-suppression.
|